Skip to content or view screen version

UK GM site locations

Friends of the Earth | 04.02.2002 13:49 | Bio-technology | Ecology

Last week the Government announced the locations of it's latest round of genetically modified(GM) crop Farm Scale Trials (FSTs)

URL below has full list of trials including Grid references.

31 Jan 2002

The Government has failed to increase the separation distances around the latest round of GM crop trials - announced earlier today - despite an admission by Environment Minister, Margaret Beckett that the current distances may not prevent neighbouring crops from significant levels of GM pollution [1]. FOE believes that the separation distances for GM oil seed rape trials should be at least 5km. The separation distance between GM oil seed rape and conventional varieties is currently 50 metres. Friends of the Earth has described today's announcement as reckless.

Pete Riley, GM campaigner at Friends of the Earth said:

"The separation distance around these GM crop trials are pathetic. If they go ahead neighbouring and organic crops within a 5 kilometres radius will be at risk from GM contamination. The Government knows the separation distances are inadequate but has recklessly failed to act.

Earlier today Food Standard's Agency revealed that 15 per cent of bakery products were contaminated with GM soya. These trials may lead to similar contamination incidents in the food chain and deny the public its right to say no to GMOs"

Last September the Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission published a report which was critical of the FSEs. One of its recommendations was that "the programme of FSEs should be completed subject to...the Government working with SCIMAC and representatives of the organic farming industry to set adequate separation distances for the remaining trials to ensure that the interests of all parties are accommodated." Earlier this month Environment Minister, Margaret Beckett, responded that "the separation distances for the FSEs have been set to ensure that cross-pollination is a maximum of 1%. However...there is a case for separation distances to be greater so as to ensure a maximum of, for example, 0.1% cross-pollination". To achieve this FOE estimates that separation distances should be at least 5 km. Last year the European Commission said that a 5km separation distance would be needed to ensure that oilseed rape seed production achieved a contamination threshold of 0.3%.

Earlier today the FSA revealed that 15 % of bakery products surveyed contained GM ingredients - none of them were labelled. Three samples were found to contain more than 1% GM Soya Such products are required to be labelled as containing GM under EC regulation. It is not known how the products came to be contaminated with GM material as most European food manufacturers now avoid GM ingredients in response to overwhelming consumer rejection of the new technology.

1.  http://www.aebc.gov.uk/aebc/response_crops.html

Friends of the Earth
- Homepage: http://www.foe.co.uk/campaigns/real_food/press_for_change/gm_trial_locations/index.html

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

GM Schlops - Fight Capitalism, Not Crops!

04.02.2002 19:49

Fight Capitalism, Not Crops!

What's all this about GM? There's no evidence there's anything dangerous about 'em! Let's go get the WEF, and fuck over the entire capitalist economy, priorities please! We KNOW Capitalismo Kills, so lets kill Capitalism. Don't get distracted by Lord Felchett's petty fads and hobbies. Perhaps he got bored hunting, and wanted something violent to do in the countryside!!!

Anarchos - without government

Destroy Authority! Dismantle Government!

Pietro Rocho


Er.......I think you are bing silly

04.02.2002 22:48

The comment above shows that the author has not fully considered the implications of GM technology - which at the present time should be opposed, even if it could be proved it was safe. GM is being pushed by agribusiness as a key part of the TNCs "globalisation" (Global domination) agenda. The idea is to have patents on all seeds so that small farmers and peasants (and ultimatley cooperatives, food industries in "bolshy" parts of the world etc)can be driven to the wall. The idea is to establish almost complete control over the food chain - and "he who controls the food chain controls the world". This is before we examine the very real scientific arguments about GM safety for humans, animals and the environment in general. These are around not just the risk of trying out a completely new technology in a lab called the "the whole world" but also issues such as the use of certain risky vectors, mutations, crop failures etc. We can't wait until "the revolution" to try and stop this - once irreperable environmental damage is done, it is done. Of course this is one struggle amongst many - but don't write it off as irrelevant - it is crucial - how important is your daily meal? How important is your kids health? How important is a further attempt at global domination? GM crops are unlikely to "feed the world", a few useful strains may be developed to sweeten the pill - but the very bitter pill is ruination for huge numbers of peasants and farmers, unknown environmental damage and a further tightening of the vice like grip of global capital. We can already "feed the world" by conventional methods - the solution is POLITICAL, not TECHNICAL. Stop the Crop!

Alan-a-Dale


Sorry Petro you are wrong

05.02.2002 10:37

Look GM is a dangerous thing - Because we are not sure of all the effects, and cant be sure until it has been released into the environment and has done it damage.
This is because nature is such a complex system it is impossible to determine what knock on effects something may have (its a chaotic system - read up on chaos theory).
I spent 4 years studying Ecology so I have a fair idea about most of this and it is very risky (at the moment the level of science is the equivelent of a monkey picking up an object that a human droped and pushing the buttons on it, it might be a lighter or it could be a gun)- but if you dont trust me how about the mainstream media

 http://uk.news.yahoo.com/020205/80/crlom.html

Joseph


GM schlops - fighting the power!

05.02.2002 18:07

There's tonnes of evidence GM is dangerous, as there is about capitalism - believe or reject, the choice is yours.
Anyway, that's not the point.

Capitalism is only one current form of domination (as was state communism etc). It is a symptom of hierarchical systems that cannot respect people or planet. That is why I fight for a better world in the best way I choose. Going to the WEF is one way, but 'the system' is present in our everyday lives where we live. I think that is where it has to be fought. Though the WEF is an important symbol, it is not where the real business goes on.

Unfortunately it ain't as simple as "cars kill, so kill cars" (or similar phrases). I fight authority and government. For me, genetics is about absolute control of our lives, and life itself. That's my good anarchist fight. Don't get stuck in cliches.

a resistance fighter