Author of "The Rise of the Meritocracy" is dead
Sposa Balincom | 16.01.2002 16:27
Michael Young (b 1915), one of the few British important post- war theoreticians, was announced dead last night.
"The Rise of the Meritocracy 1870- 2033" was written by Young in 1958 and is in a long line of political satire masquerading as fiction. Like H G Wells, he was shunned by the Fabians and other fake socialists for laying open some of the fundamental dangers of Labourism. Like Jack Londons "Iron Heel, he formulated his fears in the form of a future manuscript where instead of the socialist utopia, there arose a new form of oligarchy which he termed "Meritocracy". It is bizarre indeed that Blair should have rushed to pour accolades on Youngs grave (coming to bury not to praise, one might think) for perhaps neither he nor Brown quite understand the implications of their advocacy of Meritocracy. As recently as 29 June 2001, Young said in the Guardian;
" Four decades ago, I wrote a book warning of the risks of what i called a Meritocracy. Now my worst fears are being realised"
Young was also the author of a sociological study "Family and Kinship in East London", and an introduction to James Burnham's "The Managerial Revolution" of 1939. The latter is perhaps the only piece of political theory ever to unsettle Trotsky, with its then startling suggestion that Soviet Russia and NSDAP Germany were becoming almost indistinguishable. Young concluded that for all the mistakes Burnham made, a managerial dictatorship could still arise if democracy failed.
Michael Young 1915- 2002
" Four decades ago, I wrote a book warning of the risks of what i called a Meritocracy. Now my worst fears are being realised"
Young was also the author of a sociological study "Family and Kinship in East London", and an introduction to James Burnham's "The Managerial Revolution" of 1939. The latter is perhaps the only piece of political theory ever to unsettle Trotsky, with its then startling suggestion that Soviet Russia and NSDAP Germany were becoming almost indistinguishable. Young concluded that for all the mistakes Burnham made, a managerial dictatorship could still arise if democracy failed.
Michael Young 1915- 2002
Sposa Balincom
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
link to last years guardian article
16.01.2002 16:42
D. Sposa- Balincom
Homepage: http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0%2C3604%2C514207%2C00.html
ive been endeavouring to find an online text
16.01.2002 17:11
so heres a review by prof r m young (no relation, i imagine)
D S B again
Homepage: http://www.human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap133.htm
Here anyway, is the list of chapter headings
16.01.2002 17:34
Decline of the lower Classes:
Status of the worker:
Golden age of Equality
Gulf Between the classes
Pioneers of Dirty work
The new unemployment
Domestic servants again
Fall of the labour movement:
Historic mission
Decline of parliament
The technicians
Adjustment in the unions
Rich and poor:
Merit money
The modern synthesis
Crisis:
The first womens campaign
Modern feminist movement
Coming of the crisis
New conservatism
A rank and file at last
From here, where ?
As the full title makes clear, Young envisaged that the seeds of modern society had been laid about 1870 and would not be overthrown until 2033.
DSB yet again
we do not value our own people
16.01.2002 19:48
info-shifter
NO ONE INTERESTED ?
17.01.2002 16:04
I was actually expecting lots of objections here, on the lines that Michael Young wasnt a radical, that he took a lordship, even joined the dreaded 'SDP', and set up the OU and Which? magazine, etc etc.
I was preparing to reply that particularly in England, political analysis and personal career may not always co-incide. Still, no need to bother. But remember that both Leo Tolstoy and Pyeter Kropotkin were aristocrats when they werent working on their anarchistic theories.
DSB (yes, again)