Skip to content or view screen version

OH! THE SURREALITY OF IT ALL

loel | 14.12.2001 04:24


Who said who said?



Playing on CNN, Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC – virtually all of the mainstream corporate networks – was the poor quality captured video of Osama bin Laden touting (according to CIA translators) pride in his involvement in the September 11 strikes on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. On another channel, Turner Movie Classics, stories were being related about how the same agency has and does use Hollywood production techniques to create situations of deception in order to carry out its covert missions of deceit.

It is common knowledge that the agency whose primary mission is deception regularly uses special effects and other movie making methods to carry out its goals. It has even been the theme of the popular Hollywood movie “Wag the Dog.” This is business as usual; standard operating procedure for accomplishing the deception needed by the CIA and its other super secret U.S. counterparts such as the NSA. No surprise, that is their job.

What is surprising is that every news agency and major news network in the U.S. and other parts of the world, accepts the poorly produced “evidence” of bin Laden’s involvement in the 9-11 attacks without question. It is like: o.k., we have an agency that is totally and completely involved in deceit and subterfuge, they feed information to news organizations, and these news agencies haven’t the slightest inclination to question what is given to them in any regard. Any lingering doubt about the lack of existence of objective journalism in mainstream corporate media has finally been removed.

One can only wonder what new and thrilling revelations will come from the CIA. The production facilities and capabilities of the agency are virtually unlimited. After all, they have a known annual budget of $30 billion. Who knows how much is in the “black budget?” A lot of quality film and video projects can be created with that kind of money. With that money, one could even create one’s own news agency or cable news network.

During the CIA coup d’etats carried out in Guatemala in 1954 that overthrew the legitimately elected democratic government of that country, agency operatives in major U.S. news outlets played a major role in the plan’s success. Willing accomplices on the editorial boards of the New York Times, U. S. News and World Report, Christian Science Monitor, Time, Newsweek and many others played a huge roll in putting out false information on behalf of the spy organization to aid in accomplishing the overthrow of the Guatemalan government. That was in 1954.

That was almost 50 years ago. One can only imagine what new news manipulation tricks the CIA has learned since. Just maybe, they have learned to produce a cheesy video that validates a questionable accusation about who was really responsible for the attacks on September 11 in order to justify a war of highly questionable legality.

loel
- e-mail: loel@coolrio.com

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Reasons I suspect the 'evidence' to be faked

14.12.2001 08:31

Just a few things I noticed whilst watching the video on Channel 4 News last night:

1) The faces in the video are blurred and unclear, so it may not have been Bin Laden speaking.
2) Alomost every word was in the transcript, but every time a location was mentioned, it was inaudible.
3) It had apparently been taped over a video of troops investigating a crashed US chopper. Surely this would be valuble intelligence for Bin Laden, BUT if US troops found such a video, they could tape over some of it and leave the rest as 'proof' of it's origin.
4) Why would Bin Laden make such a video anyway?

So was it faked, or am I just being paranoid? Anyone else think it was a CIA fake?

David


It's an open & shut case

14.12.2001 11:49

Bin Laden obviously hasn't been observing the fast at Ramadan, having put on a considerable amount of weight. Life must be cofortable in the Tora Bora caves (high-tech CIA bases.) He's also had a touch of the sun and got darker and has someone punched his nose recently? Much flatter and wider. Luckily, Bin Laden said just about everything on this tape, (found by chance) that Bush could have hoped for, (between editing) to convince the Americans of his guilt.

NOT


Are we being 'had' again?

14.12.2001 12:17

Whilst I agree with most of the points raised, I wonder whether we are playing into the US hands here. As far as I can see this tape, be it faked or genuine, doesn't bring us any closer to an explanation of the core question here, ie. how can it be right to flatten an effectively 3rd world country in pursuit of the perpurtrator(s)? In giving us this video they are changing the agenda so that the media are dealing with the 'war' on their terms.

C D


Are we being 'had' again?

14.12.2001 13:55

Whilst I agree with most of the points raised, I wonder whether we are playing into the US hands here. As far as I can see this tape, be it faked or genuine, doesn't bring us any closer to an explanation of the core question here, ie. how can it be right to flatten an effectively 3rd world country in pursuit of the perpurtrator(s)? In giving us this video they are changing the agenda so that the media are dealing with the 'war' on their terms.

C D


Bin Laden video

14.12.2001 20:23

Watching Newsnight lastnight I was not surprised to see yet another video of Osama Bin Laden displaying his apparent guilt. Whether this is fake or not, its very convenient that whenever doubts occur about the war on terrorism a somewhat dubious video of Bin Laden appears to remind us that the death of countless civillians is worth it because look here's the culprit boasting!

Lynn
mail e-mail: lynn_bailey1@hotmail.com