Skip to content or view screen version

The Cancer Racket Exposed

Gavin Phillips | 14.11.2001 19:18

New nonprofit website dedicated to informing people about the suppression of effective cancer treatments

Hello,

There are times in our lives when we must stand up for certain issues, rights or just pass on information that we believe is crucial. For me, this is one of those times. After about 14 months and 1500 some hours of research, I know that at least a dozen very effective cancer treatments have and are being suppressed by the pharmaceutical/medical complex. My answer as to Why? is fairly long and is answered at my newly created non-profit website. My article, "The Cancer Racket" was published in "Clamor" magazines Feb/Mar (re-titled, "Can You Trust Your Doctor"?) issue this year. Feel free to email and circulate it on the Internet, unchanged, non-commercially and with attribute please.

Over ten thousand Americans die every week from cancer, a medical vietnam every 6 weeks. Yet here we are in the 21st century still being prescribed the same three treatments that have failed for over 50 years; surgery, chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Surgery is the most effective of the three but has limitations and other disadvantages. Chemotherapy and radiation are toxic, cause cancer, and wreck the immune system. They cause very serious side-effects and do far more harm than good for the vast majority of cancer patients. But those are our main options, so the oncologists say.

Please read this next story and try to put yourself in the shoes of Ric and Paula Schiff. In 1993 their 4 year old daughter, Crystin, became ill with the most deadly form of brain cancer. Crystin underwent surgery at the University of California at San Francisco Medical Center (UCSF). Crystin's prognosis was bleak, she would be dead in a few months. Chemotherapy and radiation treatment may extend her life further, but the side-effects were appalling. Ric and Paula were told there were no other treatment options.

Crystin went through six months of hell. During this time Ric and Paula found out about Dr. Burzynski's non-toxic antineoplastons that have very few short term side effects and are very effective against brain cancer. The doctors at UCSF told them it was worthless. Ric and Paula decided to go ahead anyway.

Incredibly, antineoplastons put Crystin into remission. Although Crystin died in 1995, it was not from cancer, but from brain damage as a result of chemotherapy and radiation treatment.

Later Ric and Paula found out that a doctor at UCSF had taken a close interest in a previous patients success using antineoplastons . From 1989/1993 Dr. Prados had sent Burzynski 14 lettters documenting the case of Jeff Keller's brain cancer remission using Burzynski's treatment. Yet this doctor told Ric and Paula Schiff that antineoplastons were useless. See my section "Three Children Denied The Best Treatment" for more information.

Virtually all children in America with brain cancer must first be treated with chemotherapy/radiation treatment. After the pharmaceutical companies have extracted their blood dollars the child may be allowed access to antineoplastons. But it is usually too late because the chemotherapy/radiation has destroyed the childs immune system. Parents who try refusing orthodox cancer treatments for their children will probably be facing a court order and their child made a ward of the State. We must have medical freedom of choice.

Please help spread the word about the most egregious scandal in the history of medicine. The pharmaceutical/medical complex ban natural/cheap cancer treatments so they can keep peddling their highly lucrative chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Meanwhile, our children, grandparents, wives, husbands, family and friends keep dying.
Thank you for your time.
Gavin Phillips
If you have a website, please post a link to my website
Exposing the Cancer Indu$try
http://www.cancerinform.freewebsites.com/

Gavin Phillips
- e-mail: freee95@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://www.cancerinform.freewebsites.com

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

People before Profit

14.11.2001 20:46

A world living in peace on a global scale is something that many profess to desire. They teach their children to pray for world peace. Yet there are those who profit from the misery of those around them. Consider for a moment. What type of reaction would you expect from pharmaceutical companies if it were known that there is a cure for every form of cancer known? Would these companies, that now receive thousands of dollars per treatment for chemotherapy, be happy to know that there is a way to cure cancer that requires but one injection? What if there was a cure for AIDS that required only a series of three injections? How would an oil company react to the knowledge that there was a power source, one that was abundant, non-polluting, totally efficient? And that conversion of an automobile to this power source could be done at a cost of approximately $20.00? Would such a revelation be welcomed by those sitting on the Board of Directors of a major oil company? Somehow, I think not.

Alpha


People not Profit

14.11.2001 21:12

A world living in peace on a global scale is something that many profess to desire. They teach their children to pray for world peace. Yet there are those who profit from the misery of those around them. Consider for a moment. What type of reaction would you expect from pharmaceutical companies if it were known that there is a cure for every form of cancer known? Would these companies, that now receive thousands of dollars per treatment for chemotherapy, be happy to know that there is a way to cure cancer that requires but one injection? What if there was a cure for AIDS that required only a series of three injections? How would an oil company react to the knowledge that there was a power source, one that was abundant, non-polluting, totally efficient? And that conversion of an automobile to this power source could be done at a cost of approximately $20.00? Would such a revelation be welcomed by those sitting on the Board of Directors of a major oil company? Somehow, I think not.

Alpha


Some links to more information

14.11.2001 21:39

About Burzynski and "antineoplastons":

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/burzynski1.html

The Antineoplaston Anomaly:
How a Drug Was Used for Decades in Thousands of
Patients, With No Safety, Efficacy Data
The Cancer Letter, Vol. 24, No. 36, Sept. 25, 1998.

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/burzynski2.html

About the grand conspiracy to suppress cancer cures:

Is There a Conspiracy to Suppress Cancer Cures?
Steven Novella, M.D.
Stephen Barrett, M.D.

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/conspiracy.html

"Some Notes on the Nature of Science"

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/science.html

The Millenium Project's Cancer 100 Challenge:

 http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/cancer100.htm

A simple explanation of a standard of proof that quack cures just never seem to meet, unlike evidence-based medicine.

If you go to the Web site mentioned in the article, you'll see that our quackery fan is also on about a dubious cancer treatment called 714X.

About the history of 714X and its promoter:

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/714x.html


Every IMC you spam, quackboy. Every time.

Mulberry Sellers


Some links to more information

15.11.2001 03:52

About Burzynski and "antineoplastons":

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/burzynski1.html

The Antineoplaston Anomaly:
How a Drug Was Used for Decades in Thousands of
Patients, With No Safety, Efficacy Data
The Cancer Letter, Vol. 24, No. 36, Sept. 25, 1998.

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/burzynski2.html

About the grand conspiracy to suppress cancer cures:

Is There a Conspiracy to Suppress Cancer Cures?
Steven Novella, M.D.
Stephen Barrett, M.D.

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/conspiracy.html

"Some Notes on the Nature of Science"

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/science.html

The Millenium Project's Cancer 100 Challenge:

 http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/cancer100.htm

A simple explanation of a simple standard of proof that quack cures just never seem to meet, unlike evidence-based medicine.

If you go to the Web site mentioned in the article, you'll see that our quackery fan is also on about a dubious cancer treatment called 714X.

About the history of 714X and its promoter:

 http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/714x.html


Every IMC you spam, quackboy. Every time.

Mulberry Sellers