Skip to content or view screen version

MPs rebel over war vote

Bin an Dun | 01.11.2001 23:00

Thursday, 1 November, 2001, 20:35 GMT
MPs rebel over war vote
A total of 13 MPs voted on a technicality in what was
described as a symbolic move to register protest
against the war.

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk_politics/newsid_1631000/1631501.stm
Thursday, 1 November, 2001, 20:35 GMT
MPs rebel over war vote



A total of 13 MPs voted on a technicality in what was
described as a symbolic move to register protest
against the war.

Welsh and Scottish nationalists joined with the rebels
for the vote.

The government has argued
there is no need to allow a
vote directly on the issue of
the military campaign as the
vast majority of MPs support
the action.

In the end 373 MPs
supported the Labour
leadership.

But the rebel MPs still hope
that their move will increase
the pressure on the
government to allow a full
Commons vote.

Opening the debate on the
military campaign, Defence
Secretary Geoff Hoon
challenged those opposed to military action to say what
they would do to counter the "very, very, very real"
terror threat.

"We are right to take military action, we simply have no
choice," Mr Hoon told MPs.

The defence secretary said the campaign was effectively
"degrading" Taleban and terrorist military capabilities.

Targeted action

And he tried to allay fears
over the use of "carpet
bombing", which he said
was an inaccurate term for
what was in fact carefully
targeted action.

Mr Hoon faced down
complaints too over the use
of cluster bombs, which had
one MP arguing: "Even a
just cause can be
jeopardised by using unjust
weapons."

The minister said the
bombs were not land mines
and it was right to use them
against certain targets.

But during what were often bad tempered exchanges a
series of Labour MPs attacked the policy of bombing.

One of the rebels, George Galloway, said: "You wouldn't
think, listening to the secretary of state for defence,
that more than half of the population of the country
want the bombing to stop now so that humanitarian aid
could be flooded in."

He said there was great unease and opposition to the
war and he called for a pause in bombing during the
Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Another MP, Brian Sedgemore attacked Prime Minister
Tony Blair's tone in talking about the action.

"He should stop being so damned preachy about the
alleged moral superiority of this backward, fractious
island of ours off the coast of north west Europe whose
culture sometimes seems to me to be close to
irreversible decline,"

"He should realise, thank God, that everyone doesn't
want to be British."

Shadow defence secretary Bernard Jenkin stressed the
full support of the Conservatives for the military action.

Linking action to security

Mr Jenkin welcomed Tony Blair's "unambiguous"
reiteration of the campaign's fundamental purpose,
made in a speech earlier this week.

But he raised concerns about government media
briefings about the military campaign.

He said that the public would "hate the idea that
ministers may be feeding speculation, might actually
help the enemy and even put the lives of British
servicemen at risk".

"This is not like managing the media for the usual
domestic political agenda. Our adage should be 'less is
more'.

"The less the government says about our plans, the
more confidence people are likely to have that the right
decisions are being made."

Cluster bombs

Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Menzies
Campbell urged the government to be cautious over the
use of cluster bombs against Afghanistan.

He acknowledged the weapons could be extremely
effective against some military targets but there was
"no disguising the revulsion with which they are
regarded by many in the UK".

"Sometimes it's worth giving up a military capability,
because the benefits of the political advantage are so
substantial as to outweigh any military advantage that
may be discarded," he said

Bin an Dun
- Homepage: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk_politics/newsid_1631000/1631501.stm

Comments

Hide the following 10 comments

mps are crap

02.11.2001 10:30

So let's get this right. At a time when B52s and cluster bombs are being used against a country facing mass starvation 11 Labour MPs voted against the war. That's, what, maybe 3% or 4% of Labour MPs, at a time when probably over half the country is opposed to the conduct of this war.

There is enormous potential for building an anti-war movement in this country, but the thing that will kill it more surely than anything else will be seeing the labour party, mps and the like as being in any way on our side.

I'm sick of building demos so I can stand and listen to a labour mp telling me at the end that I ought to do stuff. I don't even think the handful of labour MPs who voted against the war are much shakes. Why can't they resign from the labour party? - it is conducting the war after all!

I know the trots vote labour (I wish explain why) and I'm sure there's a really subtle reason I'm too thick to get about how lefty mps are changing things from within and it's important to highlight these people. But, quite honestly, fuck that. They're cowards for not leaving labour (and the salary that goes with it) and I'd rather listen to the women's institute (who are probably raising money for refugees while Clare Short stops food getting in) than some labour MP.

Pie the lot I say.

x


Symbollocks

02.11.2001 10:42

"The less the government says about our plans, the
more confidence people are likely to have that the right
decisions are being made."

What Orwellian 'Newspeak' Shite!

So, if we don't know what our government is doing, that should instill confidence in the people, that they are doing the right thing?

The democratic voice of the majority has spoken-

"STOP THE BOMBING NOW!"

We've gotta get rid of this plague infesting our 'Commons' the best the scum can do is have a 'symbolic' vote on whether or not to blitz a stone-age country!

M.P's


most trots don't vote Labour

02.11.2001 12:12

Just for info; most 'trots' now vote and campaign as part of the Socialist Alliance, opposing Labour in elections.

Ben Drake
mail e-mail: ben.drake@york.gov.uk
- Homepage: http://www.socialistalliance.net/


N5

02.11.2001 12:38

Where's Guy Fawkes when we need him...

Most 'western democracies' do not represent their people and haven't for
some time. They now tend to represent corporate interests and the military
industrial complex.

Tim


Today's Guy Fawlkes

02.11.2001 14:06

Tim, if you want a guy who likes to blow up big, symbolic government buildings, he's living in Afghanistan today.
I sincerely hope he gets the cunts in parliament.

Andy O'C


SWP vote labour

02.11.2001 16:10

Ben Drake (SWP I presume) writes "Just for info; most 'trots' now vote and campaign as part of the Socialist Alliance, opposing Labour in elections."

In fact, The SWP voted Socialist Alliance in a minority of seats at the last election and voted - and urged others to vote - Labour in the majority of seats. As far as I am aware that has not changed since the Labour government went to war.

I am sure I will be accused of 'nitpicking' while bombs are dropping - but this is important. The SWP are simply lying about their support for the government. If you don't want to vote for the government change your policy; if you do continue voting labour stop denying it.

Movements built on lies don't work.

j


okay but here's a thought

02.11.2001 17:19

True, the Socialist Alliance was strong enough to run candidates only in a minority of seats last time round. Next time we'd love to stand in more, ideally all. Why not get involved and help?

Ben Drake
mail e-mail: ben.drake@york.gov.uk
- Homepage: http://www.socialistalliance.net/


ben - a question

02.11.2001 17:38

..and did the SWP vote for the government in the other seats? Well, yes, and it's a bit creepy the way you simply won't admit it. I'd be embarassed too, but then I wouldn't vote for the government cause I'm against it.

No wonder people distrust you lot.

.


creepy? moi?

02.11.2001 17:57

Didn't mean to evade the question. All us lefties, including SWP members, faced a tough choice in seats with no socialist candidate. Some voted Labour; some preferred Green or even Lib Dem (!); many didn't vote at all. The issue was, naturally, discussed in the SWP and Socialist Worker; arguments were advanced for voting Labour in some cases to keep Tories out, but so were other positions. Was it different for you?

Ben Drake
mail e-mail: ben.drake@york.gov.uk
- Homepage: http://www.socialistalliance.net


whoever you vote for

02.11.2001 23:48

Whoever you vote for you could never again support in any way a party that has a war criminal as its head. Even with your career on the line you cant do it. Unless you reveal your party leader and prime minister as a liar and a thief - someone , who with foreknowledge of the events, can be seen to be a reactor to events - he's so false - look at him at question time - about to explode his cover - the puffiness and lines around the eyes - and the eyes so dark and profound. Look at this bloke - with your eyes open wide

dwight heet