Skip to content or view screen version

London Civil Disobedience Sit Down report

rikki blue | 21.10.2001 20:55

Respectable turn out to this event despite atrocious weather. A successful demonstration - but where are the media reports?

Just got back from the "civil disobedience mass sit-down" in Whitehall (London) today. This was called by ARROW who are sponsored by the Green Party, CND, and Campaign Against The Arms Trade. Despite torrential rain and cold weather, there was a turn out of roughly 500 people at the start of the march and we walked along a cordoned off Strand and started to walk down Whitehall accompanied by a huge number of police and quite a large number of press and television cameramen/women.

As we approached Downing Street it became clear that the police had put barriers across the road penning us towards the pavement and so the sit-down occurred maybe two or three hundred yards short of Downing Street. The weather conditions remained atrocious, and yet around 60 people sat in the road while the rest of us stood around them giving support. Police were "inviting" people to carry on with the march, but there was absolute solidarity and we remained where we were. The police then indicated that they intended to open up the road enough for one line of traffic to pass and that anyone hindering this would be liable for arrest. However, despite a couple of attempts to pick people up and move them, everyone 'sat' their ground, and the police backed off. Votes were taken as to the further progress of the sit-down and it was agreed after an hour to continue for a further half hour. Formal speeches were interspersed with open mike comments and spirits were kept up by a continual supply of teas for the sitters. The police remained for the most part good-natured about the situation, and joined in one of the votes by putting their hands up in favour of finishing the action. It was pointed out that they only could vote if they joined the sit-down and some of them laughed.

After the final half-hour it was agreed that the point had been made, and that there would no doubt be further opportunities to get arrested before the war is called off (!:), so the whole group stood and we walked together towards the cenotaph, where three people were allowed to lay all the white flowers that protestors had brought. After another minute of silence for the victims in New York and the victims in Afghanistan we peacefully dispersed into the grey, wet London streets.

Despite the media attendance, I have just watched the Channel 4 news and there was nothing about it at all. Last week saw the biggest London demo for many many years and it received minimal TV coverage and just a few lines in most of the Sunday papers. A quarter of a million Italians marched last weekend and we hardly heard about it in British media.

I feel that to get the attention we deserve, perhaps the next big rally should be a peaceful march on Broadcasting House/BBC Television Centre and a blockade of their staff - then perhaps we might get some attention!!!

How do others feel about this sort of idea - any other suggestions?

rikki blue

Comments

Hide the following 11 comments

how about using our pasports

21.10.2001 21:41

How about a demonstration at the Home Office where people throw their passports at the building - the message being - 'if this war is being conducted in my name - I am no longer British - have your fucking passport back jackass new labour'
(I'm sure we'd get the passports returned after the details were duly noted for future internment)

dwight heet


Burn them

21.10.2001 22:23

Why not simply burn our passports en masse? OK, so we'd have to pay for new ones when we want to escape this mad island. But the act of several hundred or thousand people burning the one thing that identifies them as British citizens would be an extremely defiant gesture. In fact, this was done by Ghandi and other Asians in South Africa in non-violent defiance of the racist authorities.

Dan Brett
mail e-mail: dan@danielbrett.co.uk


BBC Demo - good idea

21.10.2001 23:27

A demo outside the BBC would be a good idea - not only to get some media attantion, but also to protest against the fact that very few reporters seem to be doing their job properly. Most of the time we are just fed the same old NATO lies - no wonder so many people are behind the government. If the media in the west highlighted the governments inconsistencies a bit more, then the mood could truly turn against the war.

Richard L.


Anti-war Action

22.10.2001 02:38

The passport burning is a good idea, one which I would support if I had a passport, I really should apply for one soon. It is obvious that the press are only going to be interested in reporting these continuing protests if something, for the want of a better word, radical takes place. I attended the march on saturday 13th October 2001, and was one of the wet but determined people that sat down this sunday (21st October) at whitehall and I am disgusted at the lack of coverage both events have received. Today (sunday) the media maintained a reasonably heavy presence until it became clear that no arrests would be made. There is obviously no story in a group of soggy, moraly minded individuals excercising their right to voice their freely formed opinions. If we had turned over and set fire to police vans would things have been different?
The recent anti-capatalist demonstrations have recieved massive media attention largly due to the violence and property damage which occured. Personaly I do not agree with such action and obviously when the object of a protest is peace this would be detremental to the cause. However a determined effort must be made to produce a, in effect, media friendly image in order to get the message across; both to the general puplic, that they are not alone in their apprehention of this unjust war and to show our distain towards the goverment's action, backed up by phantom, newspaper backed, opion polls.
My friends and I have toyed with the idea of converting to Irish, or other, citizenship to show our displeasure with the actions of this government, but how could this be displayed publically?
Everyones thoughts would be greatly appreciated, please contact me about any related ideas and actions, either through this message board or through my e-mail address.

Thank you to all,
James Scott, Tay Quartermain and Martyn Jackson (the unofficial De Monfort University Ant-War Coalition)

jammus
mail e-mail: jammus@yahoo.com


BBC Demo, Tuesday 23rd October, 5.30

22.10.2001 09:19

The BBC demo is tomorrow, called by Media Workers against the War, Broadcasting house, 5.30 on Tuseday 23rd October, see this link for a leaflet:

 http://www.mwaw.org/article.php?sid=199

Martin


Corporate coverage

22.10.2001 16:25

Indie gave good coverage today:

 http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=100754

Online.ie covered it yesterday

 http://www.online.ie/news/latest_world/viewer.adp?article=1551251

Guardian just included a picture of a goth girl sitting down with a flower and a caption. On Media workers against war site (very good info btw) they explain how the Guardian admitted it was a mistake not to cover the massive central london demo last week on the 15th october:

===

 http://www.mwaw.org/article.php?sid=207&mode=thread&order=0

The Guardian editor has admitted that “it was a mistake” for the the paper to have failed to cover the huge anti-war march in London on Saturday 13 October.

The readers’ editor, Ian Mayes, wrote in his column on Saturday 20 October: “This week began with a flurry of calls demanding, not unreasonably, to know why the anti-war march in London last weekend was not covered in Monday's Guardian. The most modest estimate of numbers put the size of the march at 20,000 and the organisers believed that as many as 50,000 people had turned out. It was covered in our sister paper the Observer on Sunday with a picture and accompanying story, but, most of us would agree, not exhaustively.
I raised the matter at the first opportunity, the editor's Monday morning conference which, since September 11, has been attended by up to 60 members of the editorial staff of the paper. The editor's immediate response was to say that he agreed with the callers, it was a mistake and should have been covered.

It is the paper's general policy not to cover marches. The editor said that in the present context this case was clearly different. He added that 20,000 people - among them many Muslims - most of them possibly "Guardian readers", as he put it, had been on the march and we had appeared not to notice.

m hor


Related URLS

22.10.2001 16:45

-


More direct action ahoy!

22.10.2001 17:18

After sundays success - and it certainly was a success to pull so may people onto the streets for a sit down in torrential bloody terrible rain (and a great mix of ages and backgrounds represented) - there are lots of people up for more non-violent action - get thinking...

====================

plus this, not action but still a good idea:

Latest proposal / call for rememberance from ARROW
 http://www.justicenotvengeance.org :

ARROW calls for international days of remembrance 10 and 11 Nov

In this section:
Anti-war vigils Sunday 11 November
Teach-ins/public meetings Saturday 10 November

ARROW is calling for groups around the UK and around the world to hold anti-war vigils on the 11th of November 2001, to oppose the war against Afghanistan, to call for "food not bombs for Afghanistan" and to oppose any widening of the war to other countries.


Anti-war vigils Sunday 11th November

The 11th of November is Remembrance Day in Britain, when the nation remembers soldiers who have fallen in Britain's wars. It is also Veterans' Day in the USA.

Vigils

We are calling for British anti-war groups to hold vigils at their local war memorials at 1:30pm on Sunday 11 November, to remember the victims of 11 September (it will be two months exactly after the atrocities in New York and Washington DC) and the victims of war and famine in Afghanistan. The time of day has been chosen so as to avoid a clash with the normal Remembrance Day events, and also to mark the time of the first aeroplane strike on the World Trade Centre.


Three minute silence

We propose a simultaneous international 3 minutes of silence at 8:45am Eastern Standard Time (USA), 1:45pm UK time (we'll be back on GMT by then). During these three minutes we will remember the victims of 11 September and the victims of war and avoidable famine in Afghanistan.


Register

Please register the details of your local event by emailing  feedback@justicenotvengeance.org. Please also inform your local media of your anti-war vigil.

Please email this page to local groups. (You can do this by selecting 'send' from the File menu of your browser and then selecting the 'page by email' option).

Teach-ins/public meetings Saturday 10th November

ARROW is also calling on local anti-war groups to organise teach-ins or public meetings on Saturday 10 November to help people to understand the current conflict and its background.

Again, we would be grateful if you could register your educational event by emailing  feedback@justicenotvengeance.org

nvda that is...


SILENCES and CENOTAPHS these make me sick

24.10.2001 13:17

there is nothing quite so creepy as two or three minutes' silences; they celebrate death actually. much better to have an equivalent amount of loud singing. as for the so-called cenotaph, are the peace protesters trying to join in with its usual function, or to parody it ?

auguste


loud or quiet?

24.10.2001 13:54


Celebrate death? depends of ya kultcha i guess. some do, some don't. some do it quitetly, others with noise. some approaches offend others, ie noise tends to offend the quiet ones, but quiet tends not to offend noise makers.

can't see how a few moments of quiet in this noisy cluttered world can be seen as creepy, it's a moment for group reflection - use it how you wish.

Pers