Skip to content or view screen version

The Terrorist War is A Propaganda War

English Ecologists Against Plan Colombia | 21.10.2001 17:29

The new terrorist war and Colombia.


The Terrorist War is a Propaganda War.

The United States of America has recently, in the wake of the September 11th attacks on the WTC and The Pentagon, symbols of its Imperialist power, outlined the new war as a war on terrorism.
What has followed is a propaganda war of the like and intensity that has not been witnessed since the Cold War. The propaganda war seeks to convince, by force of repetition and misrepresentation of the truth, all people to accept the crazy requisites of the USA and their loyal lapdog, the UK for the making of a world “peace” or “world order” that is enforced by a military and technological firepower without equal anywhere in the world.
Peace at the end of the barrel of a gun.

Anyone who is familiar with the scenario in Colombia will know that the USA supports a government there that has consistently, for the past forty years and more, violently oppressed its people.
Paramilitary groups continue from day to day to murder, rape and torture countless Colombian civilians in all walks of life. Just the other day we listened to the frightening account of a brave Colombian woman working for the Organizacion Feminina Popular in Barrancabermeja in the Magdelena Medio. This is an important geostrategic area of Colombia rich in oil and other minerals including gold, which despite (or because of?) that has a large instance of poverty, displacement and abuse of human rights to the point where people are living in constant fear, hungry in a land of plenty where their crops and jobs are destroyed and the fruits of their lands robbed by the Imperialist thieves in order that they should have more of what they have more than enough of, MONEY. The paramilitary activities are driven by the interests of multi-national companies concerned with securing and protecting land that is useful to them for the potential profits it contains. The rights and needs of a terrorised population are not important in this case but still there are people of immense courage who resist without weapons and try to give hope to their people.
She spoke of the terrible circumstances faced by popular organisations in that area where paramilitary groups are operating freely despite (or because of?) a large official military and police presence in the zone. In the face of constant threats and violent attacks her organisation have continued in their effort to educate, encourage and nurture community solidarity and self help projects in the defence of their human rights. She told us that, although Colombia is signed up to just about every human rights and international convention of a humanitarian nature and has enshrined in its constitution statutes that declare an interest in democracy and freedom up the point that Colombia is stated as being the oldest Latin American democracy, in reality none of this is worth the paper it is written on.

In Colombia the government does not defend or protect the democratic rights of its people, it defends the claims of a rich minority that operate in the pay of the USA.
Further more, the Colombian regime accuses and persecutes anybody exercising their human right to have an opinion other than the imposed viewpoint. Those people in whatever part are labelled as guerrillas; such is the paranoid schizophrenia of those in power.
The young lady who had travelled to England to speak to us said that international support and solidarity is very important for her people. The oppressors need to know that we are watching and that we know what they are doing. We need to put them in the spotlight.

Terrorism, the new excuse:
George W Bush’s assertment that “If you’re not for us you’re against us” is the psychotic rambling of someone who is only the mirror image of the Arab terrorist he is fighting against. In simple words it takes one to know one.
The USA are at pains to point out, however, that they are not fighting a war against Islam. They are right; it is a war that has been declared against the freedom of every human being on this planet to live, express and believe what they want to. It is a war that seeks to define freedom as being a certain way of life involving the consuming of large quantities of fast food, fizzy drinks such as Coca-Cola, mind numbing television programmes and the robbing and looting of the rest of the world so that a small percentage of the population can enjoy luxury whilst millions go hungry.
The Statue of Liberties should be renamed “The Statue of taking Liberties.”

The long term likely effects for the situation in Colombia are the shifting of the definition of the war as being a war on drugs to a war on terrorism despite the fact that up till now the guerrilla armies of Colombia have not taken their war for self determination outside their country.
Obviously the definition of terrorism is an arbitrary definition depending on whether you are serving or resisting the projects and ideologies of the USA.

No lover of freedom and real democracy anywhere would pretend that the Arab Fundamentalists of the Taleban etc are anything but fanatical thugs taking advantage of the suffering of their people in order to fortify their power and sadism. However, the fact that they were created and funded by the USA in the first place reveals an uncomfortable truth and that is that many groups of extremist and violent dictators have been encouraged and created by the USA when it is politically convenient to do so (in order to fight a proxy war and/or serve their economic interests). When they later become inconvenient the USA washes its hands of its part in their crimes and like hypocrites denounce the said group as terrorists, drug traffickers, subversives’ etc. Furthermore other groups that have an impulse for social justice and protest, despite the fact they don’t use weapons of death, are also conveniently branded as part of the terrorist network of “Anti Americans.” All we can say is that the USA suffers from extreme paranoia because it is haunted by the dark shadow it has created. This is an extremely unbalanced psychology and because of the size and power it commands, a very dangerous one for all people of this Earth.
In Colombia the paramilitaries (AUC) operate with complete impunity killing anyone that they consider, in their paranoia, to be guerrilla. It is a harsh irony that although the AUC are now defined as a terrorist group by the USA, with the other hand the USA continues to feed a government and military that has known and proven links to the paramilitary. They are allowed, by the Colombian regime, to operate without prosecution or obstruction despite the fact that they are smuggling most of the drugs out of Colombia, not to mention the acts of barbarity that they commit every day against the defenceless people.
As time goes on perhaps the AUC will get out of hand and their interests will conflict with those of the USA and then they will be actively persued for their terrorism, but not before they have fulfilled their current purpose as useful tools in the implementation of USA foreign policy and the crushing of a dangerous popular rebellion that threatens the local hegemony of the Imperialist from the North.

As every US administration for as long as anyone can remember has done, the current one is quietly washing the blood from its hands before taking the platform to “defend peace and democracy.”
Many eyes of the world are not blind to this and surely in the course of time the eyes of history will not ignore the institutionalised terrorism carried out under the cover of a constant stream of propaganda or better put LIES, LIES and more LIES.

When is terrorism illegal?
When it is carried out against the US interests.
When is terrorism legal?
When it is carried out in the interests of the USA.

English Ecologists Against Plan Colombia


English Ecologists Against Plan Colombia

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Nothing has or will change

21.10.2001 17:58

America, we have met the enemy,
and they are US!
"I spent 33 years in the Marines. Most of my time being a high-classc muscle man for Big business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism.I helped make Mexico safe for oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenue in. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras "right" for American fruit companies in 1903. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints."
-Marine Corps General Smedley D. Butler
New York Times August 21, 1931
Reprinted in Morrow Book of Quotations in American History
End

I stand with you on Colombia,i saw what the fuckers did down in Nicaragu in the 70s and 80s. If ever there was a full meaning to the word "terror-ism" Ronald (dim-wit)Reagan and the CIA did it justice in Nicaragua.The US must be the only Country in the world to name an airport after a terrorist. What really worries me is that G W Bush is from the same "Stable"

M J Lacey
- Homepage: http://members.tripod.co.uk/Arrtus/index.htm


For a new kind of solidarity

22.10.2001 02:51

Your article raises some important points. The parallel you draw between the Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan and the paramilitaries here in Colombia, for example. It is not inconceivable that the Colombian armed forces with US backing attack these groups that they themselves helped set up and which create the kind of scorched earth policy for the state and the multinationals to then go in and ‘mop up’.
I agree in general with your comments on the effect of the ‘war on terrorism’ here in Colombia.
What I felt was missing from your article was a more critical approach. It just seems to be the standard left wing take on the issue, which doesn’t take on board the issue of the Colombian guerrilla movements and left in general. This uncritical approach was endemic in all the traditional ‘solidarity movements’ of the past, but neither Colombians nor any other people are going to thank foreigners for being uncritical in this respect and simplifying the situation.
For example, you talk about Barrancabermeja. This city through the 90s had strong guerrilla militias in its neighborhoods (ELN and EPL particularly). How did the paramilitaries defeat these groups and establish their control over the last couple of years? Why for example were some guerrilla militias liquidating the smaller ones like those of the EPL as this happened?
The flipside of state and parastatal repression is the failure of the opposition. We need to look at the dynamics of the war in Colombia. The authoritarian, Leninist nature of all the armed opposition groups means that they are more interested in controlling a passive mass than actually being the armed expression of a mass movement. Thus the war has become like a fight for territorial control, like any conventional war. The more you can put the fear into people, the more power you have. And unfortunately the paramilitaries are the experts at that game. That is why it is they who are growing the most and more importantly where it matters – in urban Colombia.

Its typical of the Leninist left in Britain and elsewhere not to want us to have these debates. They say we should all just unite behind the anti-imperialist forces whoever they are, because they are ‘for the people’. Foreigners, like the people, should obey and not question! I am not accusing English Ecologists against Plan Colombia of this, and it goes without saying I am FOR participating in actions against what capital and the state are doing in Colombia, as elsewhere. But it needs to be a CRITICAL participation.One effect the militarized atmosphere produced by the war has here in Colombia is that it shuts up criticism. That needs to be combatted.

But the last thing anybody in Colombia can imagine right now is a post-revolutionary society: and in a country with such large ‘revolutionary’ forces that should be a cause for concern.

punkero


In reply to A new kind of solidarity

22.10.2001 12:40


Interesting comments.

What can I say, we stand against the policies being implemented in Colombia. The Colombian people need to be united in the search for a solution and there are so many different debates and arguements as to the best way to do it that it is difficult to reconcile all of them.

However, broadly speaking, the Bolivarian movement with the support of Chavez in Venezuela seems to hold the best possibility of a cohesive post revolutionary society in Colombia.

The guerrilla groups are a consequence of decades, no centuries, of oppression. Their movement is not perfect and makes errors but every time they've tried to leave the armed struggle they've been murdered in huge numbers.

Really the people of Latin America and in this moment, Colombia, need to make a revolution that comes from their roots, with the influence of the Indigenous, black and hispanic communities... a change born in them and their authentic ideas and feelings, not one imposed from outside by Leninists, Marxists, or whatever.
Socialism with heart and feeling - grassroots democracy - no more of these absolutist systems because so far communism and capitalism have shown themselves to be two faces of one thing - Imperialism - both oppressing in their different ways the natural right of all peoples to self determination, freedom of belief and so on.
That is what has been expressed to us by many Colombians and our solidarity is to support the Colombian people in arriving at their own solution.
In my experience they have taught me more than I them.
Robert Lawson
English Ecologists Against Plan Colombia.

English Ecologists Against Plan Colombia