Building the anti war movement
Laurence | 19.10.2001 10:44
Building an antiwar movement
It's easy to feel despair, isolation and frustration at what's presented to us as an inevitable drive into an indefinitely long war. The key ingredients of success in building a successful anti-war movement are confidence in ordinary people's potential, solidarity with each other and a long-term view: we have not been able to prevent the first bombs falling, but over time we can reverse the dynamic and stop the war.
Historical experience - desertion and mutinies at the end of World War I, the international movement against the war in Vietnam, the anti-nuclear movement of the 1980s - shows that movements can stop or divert even large-scale processes of militarisation, but only when large numbers of ordinary people are actively involved. The experience of active involvement in turn gives people more confidence in their own capacities to think and act for themselves, which is an important element in building a better world. This means:
1. Making space for a diversity of voices within the movement. To insist on expressing only the most radical line will isolate activists at the very time when many ordinary people are looking for a way out. To insist on being as "mainstream" as possible will stop the movement developing and restrict participation to a small section of the population. So a good "platform" will include as wide a range of anti-war voices as possible. This enables the movement to speak to different people and is part of learning from each other.
2. Making sure that the movement emphasises activities which everyone can take part in. It's important to remember that most actions don't have an immediate chance of stopping the war; but if they give people a chance to learn how to become active, to gain confidence and to develop their own understanding, they can help build a movement that does have a chance.
3. Taking care that the movement isn't run by a handful of experienced people to the exclusion of everyone else. While activists may have particular skills, their job is to share them and pass them on. Stopping this war is likely to be a long campaign, so we will need to develop everyone's ability to take part at every level.
In terms of strategy, it's important for people to mobilise within their own everyday contexts, both to root the movement in the real world and to change the existing social relationships that ultimately give rise to war. While the movement will also need to reach out into public space and develop a "political" face, this shouldn't become separate from the rest of the movement. The point is for ordinary people to politicise themselves, not to develop a separate political Èlite. In practice, what we need to do is:
1. Start by talking to other people at work, in the shops, at home, on the bus, in school, online - anywhere where people already know us. This may seem challenging at times, but it's becoming clear that far more people are uneasy about the prospect of war than the media leads us to think. By opening up this new space for communication, we undermine some of the usual power relationships and creating space for new kinds of solidarity and friendship.
2. Offer people immediate, practical things to do: signing something, going on a march, coming to a meeting, putting up posters, circulating a letter. We're trying to "push people's boundaries" enough so that they feel they are becoming active, but not so much that they see activism as beyond their reach.
3. Encourage people to take the next step, and support them if they don't yet know how: ask them to speak at meetings or write leaflets, help them to put press releases or websites together, show them how to organise a public meeting or a march. Be careful of patronising people: the trick is to be confident that they can do whatever they set their mind to, and make sure they have the backup they need to do it. The second time somebody does something, we should leave them to it!
4. Educate ourselves: this movement is likely to last a long time, and most of us are going to have to find out more about all kinds of issues, from foreign policy to Islam to international law. This also gives us a chance to build connections by inviting speakers from other groups, from local Muslim associations to college lecturers to development organisations.
5. Make links: although (almost) anyone who opposes war should be welcomed, we should work and argue for making links to other issues, most importantly foreign policy, "development" and world economics, racism and intolerance, and civil liberties. To stop the war and leave the system ready for another war tomorrow is not enough.
6. Try to spread the movement, rather than build little empires. Encourage people to take independent action (and support them when they do); work to create networks between different groups and initiatives, without imposing a single "line" that everyone has to follow.
This war may run for years in various forms, and a movement that can stop it will need to include many different social groups. So there's space for all sorts of different action, and it's important to respect this, because it's how new people will both find their way to the movement and how other people can contribute something we might not have thought of. Different actions also have different purposes (though some overlap):
Convincing ordinary people: meetings, posters, demos, street theatre, leaflets, videos, etc. Building the movement: newsletters, mailing lists, teach-ins, websites, gatherings, benefit gigs, etc. "Stopping the machine in its tracks": 5-minute strikes for peace, occupations, peace observers, supporting deserters, blockades, etc. Influencing governments or the media: petitions, vigils, press releases, photo opportunities, etc.
We learn as movements, not just as individuals, and the dialogue between us is important. There is no book that can tell us authoritatively how we are going to stop this war; it's something we will work out together in practice. We can certainly learn from other movements and past history (several campaigns have produced excellent "how-to" guides that are a real goldmine of ideas), but at the end of the day none of us knows exactly what will work, and we won't know until we've managed to stop the war (if then!) In the process, though, we are also learning something else of immense value: how to treat each other as equals, how to cooperate and communicate without bosses and laws, and how to build the kind of world that we want to live in.
Laurence Cox (Dublin) has been involved in social movements for nearly 20 years, including opposing the Falklands War, the nuclear arms race and the second Gulf War. He's an academic specialist in social movements research, currently studying working-class community politics in Ireland.
----
This article was one of several written for Against War and Terrorism, a PDF booklet on the war.
Read the articles on the web at
http://struggle.ws/issues/war/pamOCT01.html
Print out the PDF file of the booklet from http://struggle.ws/pdf/war/warterrorpam.html
It's easy to feel despair, isolation and frustration at what's presented to us as an inevitable drive into an indefinitely long war. The key ingredients of success in building a successful anti-war movement are confidence in ordinary people's potential, solidarity with each other and a long-term view: we have not been able to prevent the first bombs falling, but over time we can reverse the dynamic and stop the war.
Historical experience - desertion and mutinies at the end of World War I, the international movement against the war in Vietnam, the anti-nuclear movement of the 1980s - shows that movements can stop or divert even large-scale processes of militarisation, but only when large numbers of ordinary people are actively involved. The experience of active involvement in turn gives people more confidence in their own capacities to think and act for themselves, which is an important element in building a better world. This means:
1. Making space for a diversity of voices within the movement. To insist on expressing only the most radical line will isolate activists at the very time when many ordinary people are looking for a way out. To insist on being as "mainstream" as possible will stop the movement developing and restrict participation to a small section of the population. So a good "platform" will include as wide a range of anti-war voices as possible. This enables the movement to speak to different people and is part of learning from each other.
2. Making sure that the movement emphasises activities which everyone can take part in. It's important to remember that most actions don't have an immediate chance of stopping the war; but if they give people a chance to learn how to become active, to gain confidence and to develop their own understanding, they can help build a movement that does have a chance.
3. Taking care that the movement isn't run by a handful of experienced people to the exclusion of everyone else. While activists may have particular skills, their job is to share them and pass them on. Stopping this war is likely to be a long campaign, so we will need to develop everyone's ability to take part at every level.
In terms of strategy, it's important for people to mobilise within their own everyday contexts, both to root the movement in the real world and to change the existing social relationships that ultimately give rise to war. While the movement will also need to reach out into public space and develop a "political" face, this shouldn't become separate from the rest of the movement. The point is for ordinary people to politicise themselves, not to develop a separate political Èlite. In practice, what we need to do is:
1. Start by talking to other people at work, in the shops, at home, on the bus, in school, online - anywhere where people already know us. This may seem challenging at times, but it's becoming clear that far more people are uneasy about the prospect of war than the media leads us to think. By opening up this new space for communication, we undermine some of the usual power relationships and creating space for new kinds of solidarity and friendship.
2. Offer people immediate, practical things to do: signing something, going on a march, coming to a meeting, putting up posters, circulating a letter. We're trying to "push people's boundaries" enough so that they feel they are becoming active, but not so much that they see activism as beyond their reach.
3. Encourage people to take the next step, and support them if they don't yet know how: ask them to speak at meetings or write leaflets, help them to put press releases or websites together, show them how to organise a public meeting or a march. Be careful of patronising people: the trick is to be confident that they can do whatever they set their mind to, and make sure they have the backup they need to do it. The second time somebody does something, we should leave them to it!
4. Educate ourselves: this movement is likely to last a long time, and most of us are going to have to find out more about all kinds of issues, from foreign policy to Islam to international law. This also gives us a chance to build connections by inviting speakers from other groups, from local Muslim associations to college lecturers to development organisations.
5. Make links: although (almost) anyone who opposes war should be welcomed, we should work and argue for making links to other issues, most importantly foreign policy, "development" and world economics, racism and intolerance, and civil liberties. To stop the war and leave the system ready for another war tomorrow is not enough.
6. Try to spread the movement, rather than build little empires. Encourage people to take independent action (and support them when they do); work to create networks between different groups and initiatives, without imposing a single "line" that everyone has to follow.
This war may run for years in various forms, and a movement that can stop it will need to include many different social groups. So there's space for all sorts of different action, and it's important to respect this, because it's how new people will both find their way to the movement and how other people can contribute something we might not have thought of. Different actions also have different purposes (though some overlap):
Convincing ordinary people: meetings, posters, demos, street theatre, leaflets, videos, etc. Building the movement: newsletters, mailing lists, teach-ins, websites, gatherings, benefit gigs, etc. "Stopping the machine in its tracks": 5-minute strikes for peace, occupations, peace observers, supporting deserters, blockades, etc. Influencing governments or the media: petitions, vigils, press releases, photo opportunities, etc.
We learn as movements, not just as individuals, and the dialogue between us is important. There is no book that can tell us authoritatively how we are going to stop this war; it's something we will work out together in practice. We can certainly learn from other movements and past history (several campaigns have produced excellent "how-to" guides that are a real goldmine of ideas), but at the end of the day none of us knows exactly what will work, and we won't know until we've managed to stop the war (if then!) In the process, though, we are also learning something else of immense value: how to treat each other as equals, how to cooperate and communicate without bosses and laws, and how to build the kind of world that we want to live in.
Laurence Cox (Dublin) has been involved in social movements for nearly 20 years, including opposing the Falklands War, the nuclear arms race and the second Gulf War. He's an academic specialist in social movements research, currently studying working-class community politics in Ireland.
----
This article was one of several written for Against War and Terrorism, a PDF booklet on the war.
Read the articles on the web at
http://struggle.ws/issues/war/pamOCT01.html Print out the PDF file of the booklet from
http://struggle.ws/pdf/war/warterrorpam.html
Laurence
Homepage:
http://struggle.ws/stopthewar.html
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
An excellent post and some more ideas
19.10.2001 12:46
I would like to add to it a note about activists emotional health.
There are strong emotions around in society of fear, anger, grief, guilt and despair amongst others. Politcial analysis does not, and should not make us immune from feeling. As social activists we choose not to cut off from the suffering caused by the war intellectually, and it is important that we do not cut off emotionally either. Emotional health is not about feeling happy all the time, but about allowing our selves to feel what we feel, painful or joyous, and allowing it move through us and to change.
If we do not find spaces, individually and as groups, to connect and express how we feel about what is happening then these feelings will emerge in other ways. Most destructively within the movement itself. I believe we have already seen evidence of this in reports on this site. One group becomes afraid of what another might do, so seeks to exclude them from decision making and involvement. The exlcuded group becomes fearful of the larger. We end up playing out in microcosm what is happening in the world as a whole.
What someone needs to do to support their emotional health will depend on their world view but we all should seek to find out what works for us. Collectively, it is important that we do have real vigils as well as protests, that we have poetry as well as analysis, and that we create spaces for people to express how they feel as well as what they think, be it in banners, or placards or in meetings.
We should not confine our concern for community emotional health to the stop the war movement: I think the sentiment that we should commit senseless acts of beauty and random acts of beauty has never been more appropriate.
As the post above says this could be a very long campaign and its certainly true that the campaign to end the conditions and society that give rise to war will not be short. So don't feel guilty about taking time out: go play with some children, plant some bulbs for the spring, climb a tree, ask for ( or better) give someone a massage, sing a song, walk up a hill, fly a kite, go look at the beautiful colours of the autumn leaves, dance in the street, play hop skip and jump, tell someone you love them, draw a picture, cook a wonderful meal, send a card to someone you haven't seen for ages, phone your parents/sisters/brothers/children, plan a wonderful holiday, arrange a party, BE ALIVE
Spinner
One million Ideas in action
19.10.2001 15:03
The movement antiwar has to prove that its an alternative to military intervention to fighting against terrorism and violence, but to achieve this, numbers have to grow to put pressure on politicians to rethink their policy and propose more democratic and compassionate solutions. The movement antiwar could take a step further to become a real alternative for peace using peaceful methods. The following is one idea to revitalise the movement and to touch the real following among common europeans. The movement antiwar could make a call for a peace march of one million people to Brussels, the European administrative centre, staging a peaceful demonstration of concerned citizens that want to rise their voice for a peaceful solution to a violent conflict.
We need a date and a general call.
One of one million people for peace
one