Skip to content or view screen version

The Myth of an American Free Press

John Swinton (Former Chief of Staff, New York | 04.10.2001 04:24

A toast given by John Swinton in 1953

by John Swinton
Chief of Staff, New York Times
(Considered "the Dean of his Profession" by his peers)
When asked to give a toast at the New York Press Club in 1953.



"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.

There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone.

The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press?

We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes." (Source: Labor's Untold Story, by Richard O. Boyer and Herbert M. Morais, published by United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, NY, 1955/1979.)

John Swinton (Former Chief of Staff, New York

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

amen

05.10.2001 04:11

what more could i possibly say? it's fustratingly pathetic. the biggest disaster to happen in u.s. history & we, the pulbic, get nothing but spinning & jigoism. i can well tell you that the whole nation was/is in shock, disbelief, dispair & grief. and what do we get? well, during the terror, nothing, b/c the Bush Baby took off in a plane, just flew the coop, voosh*vamoose. so th u.s. public is left with no one in charge, while we were left to wonder if this was just the beginning of an all out attack on the u.s.? who was behind it all? is this a chemical/biological attack? who is in charge? no offical came on the radio/air for almost 2 hours after the attack. the full scale of the pentagon attack was only released slowly throughout the day. hearing the terror attacks adding up on the news, first the towers, then the pentagon, then the reports of pittsburg, & the fact that there were many more unidentified terrorists on the loose all over the country, made the public panic rise in the face of no official response. when they did prop Bushy up to the mike, he was only allowed to say a few very vague rehearsed sentences, lest he say something incredible stupid, callous,or unintelligible (as usual).

renee


continued: amen

05.10.2001 04:31

we, the american public, are in shock over the attacks & all Bush Baby can say to us by way of explaination is "they hate our freedom (*smirk*)". jesus*christ*on*ice, i mean, tis this guy for real? the biggest horror to transpire on our soil, & they (we are well aware it's not him. he couldn't tell you what his middle name is without prompting. when our d.c. press corp asked him after Blair's speech to your parliment what he wanted the taliban govt to know, he sat there blinking & looking around at a couple of his aides to either feed him a line or rescue him. it's too embarassing to even watch. and by the way, it is rare that we see him in front of ANY live journalists at all. when he is, he has very short, simple rehearsed statments & he won't take live questions.)want us to swallow that crap??? as if there is no backstory, no past, no information whatsoever on who did it? what the reasoning might be? the mass news outlets are tabloid whores, plain & simple. they dragged out grieving family members of the victims to parade them in their shock over the air waves with pictures of the missing, as if we the public, who cannot help, are going to get off over that. they gave their coverage snappy titles like AMERICA ATTACKED! & whatnot. they didn't really seem to hold to any journalistic ethics, either, by leaking a supposed picture of palestinians cheering in the streets over the bombings, before the facts of who did it came in, & full well knowing that it would inflame the public against Arab Americans.

renee


topical!

05.10.2001 09:38

A toast, no less, from 1953. IMC - as relevant as ever.

Ziggy