My day at the Globalise Resistance counterconference (S29)
Disillusioned kid | 29.09.2001 20:45
I've just got back from the GR counterconference in Hammersmith and thought I should tell everyone what it was like.
Overall it was a good day. There were various interesting speakers, subjects under discussion and stalls for different groups. But first the complaints: The entrance to the Ponanana, where the main meetings were held was like a fecking newsagents with a variety of different socialist groups trying to sell you their stupid paper (I thought socialism equalled anti-capitalism, but then what to I know I'm an 'anarchist') and they began to get very, very irritating, very, very quickly. There were also the number of leaflets I picked up which I thought were literature on some important socio-political subject, but which were in fact little more than propaganda encouraging people to join this socialist/lenminist/stalinist organisation or that. I also noticed a distinct lack of contributions from anarchist/libertarian type people (apart from the Afed handing out slagging off-type leaflets). Something to think about next time perhaps...
The first meeting I attended was, "Resisting McLabour" in which many people spoke including Tony Benn. This had originally been intended as a anti-privatisation event but took on a more anti-war element in light of recent events and John Rees was particularly poigniant in his attack on the very idea of the war.
This meeting was followed by a break for lunch. Food was available, but the queue was so long I arsed of elsewhere. I then went to a meeting about privatisation of education (as I am currently at college). But as there were more people on the platform than in the audience so it was cancelled and instead I went to a talk on the media. Paul Foot and John Pilger spoke along with Indymedia activists about how the media works and how we can use it. A Daily Express journalist also spoke about how their union had opposed "porn barron Richard Desmond's" racist headlines on asylum seekers and was actually v. good and v. well received.
The final talk I went to was on on creative resistance at the Riverside Studios which I eventually found despite the crap map. This was interesting and due to a reduced number of speakers left a lot of time for discussion which was nice and even I got a chance to speak.
In conclusion GR still don't represent where I am politically, but they can put on a v. interesting and informative event with many big name speakers and I have to reiterate that many of them are very nice people. Now if only they could get rid of those bloody paper sellers!
Overall it was a good day. There were various interesting speakers, subjects under discussion and stalls for different groups. But first the complaints: The entrance to the Ponanana, where the main meetings were held was like a fecking newsagents with a variety of different socialist groups trying to sell you their stupid paper (I thought socialism equalled anti-capitalism, but then what to I know I'm an 'anarchist') and they began to get very, very irritating, very, very quickly. There were also the number of leaflets I picked up which I thought were literature on some important socio-political subject, but which were in fact little more than propaganda encouraging people to join this socialist/lenminist/stalinist organisation or that. I also noticed a distinct lack of contributions from anarchist/libertarian type people (apart from the Afed handing out slagging off-type leaflets). Something to think about next time perhaps...
The first meeting I attended was, "Resisting McLabour" in which many people spoke including Tony Benn. This had originally been intended as a anti-privatisation event but took on a more anti-war element in light of recent events and John Rees was particularly poigniant in his attack on the very idea of the war.
This meeting was followed by a break for lunch. Food was available, but the queue was so long I arsed of elsewhere. I then went to a meeting about privatisation of education (as I am currently at college). But as there were more people on the platform than in the audience so it was cancelled and instead I went to a talk on the media. Paul Foot and John Pilger spoke along with Indymedia activists about how the media works and how we can use it. A Daily Express journalist also spoke about how their union had opposed "porn barron Richard Desmond's" racist headlines on asylum seekers and was actually v. good and v. well received.
The final talk I went to was on on creative resistance at the Riverside Studios which I eventually found despite the crap map. This was interesting and due to a reduced number of speakers left a lot of time for discussion which was nice and even I got a chance to speak.
In conclusion GR still don't represent where I am politically, but they can put on a v. interesting and informative event with many big name speakers and I have to reiterate that many of them are very nice people. Now if only they could get rid of those bloody paper sellers!
Disillusioned kid
e-mail:
s30party@hotmail.com
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
£12 speech (thats a pun on free speech btw..)
29.09.2001 21:33
more disturbingly, they (c4) invited a guy from GR and noreena hertz to discuss the anti-capitalist movement. they managed to disagree on the war issue, making it look like the full spectrum of anti-capitalist opinion to the average viewer! when almost all of us would acknowledge that both GR and noreena have some rather large credibility problems with people from the movement.
whoever
£12 joke
29.09.2001 22:14
fucking outragous to charge anybody anything if somthing is well planned then people are happy to donate to the costs are g. r. really that capitalistic????
outraged
are the wombles in brighton?
29.09.2001 23:18
they had better be..................im looking forward to the protests and it had better be good....
i know that its gonna be organised by GR but who cares if the wombles and other libertarians like me are serious about our movement then we had better be there and join forces with other people in our movement e.g. GR, socialist alliance, swp and others...............they are part of our movement.
please let the wombles be there.......................our direct action is the only fun action..
kool be safe be in brighton
dr wonder
there's capitalism and there's practicality
30.09.2001 10:45
I'm not defending GR, here, just making a practical point.
laura
Fronts, Alliances & Movements
30.09.2001 12:28
But the alternative to GR isn't an action group that only fully signed up anarchists are going to join. The potential for an anti-capitalist movement is huge, fluffy and spikey. GR do at least realise this but want to narrow it an old-style revolutionary socialist manner. Too many anarchists just want to narrow it in another way, too anarchists. The potential is a loose, autonomous, social movement, web-like with many different varieties. Mayday was a start with this, the monopoly board was great, allowing diverse forms of action. But we need spaces to articulate this, come together as a social movement too, develop community and identity. A starting point would be the Schnews pamphlet 'Monopolise Resistance' but if this turns into an Anarchists vs SWP rant it will take us nowhere.
markp
All events are good and bad
01.10.2001 11:17
I found many of the swp/gr speakers to be quite boring, trotting out slogan after slogan without much meaning other than to support the labour party. Some swp/gr speakers were well inspiring however.
The thing I found hard to swallow was one of the closing rallying cries from a gr speaker who called on people to continue the tradition of Seattle and Genoa by going to the event in Brighton the next day. Excuse me but I fail to see how a unity march fully arranged with police is following the tradition of Seattle and Genoa etc Sure you can say it's in the spirit of... or in solidarity with... etc but a unity march from A to B is hardly the same as the civil resistance seen at these amazing protests.
I'm not attacking the choice of a fully non-confrontational unity march, but it was misleading to paint it in the same colours as the protests where our comrades have risked their own safety to carry out direct action.
Resist? YES!