Skip to content or view screen version

UK Peace movement kicks off

reclaim the streets | 19.09.2001 14:47

UK Peace movement and resistance to "war" kicks off...

Anti-War movements kicks off.

One week on from the so-called terrorist attacks in the US, the UK anti-war movement kicked-off with a day of vigil and protest.

The day began outside the Houses of Parliment where a small group of activists from the newly formed PAW (Peace and Anti-War) collective gathered at 2pm with banners reading; "Iraq - New York - Palesitne...? All Mass Murder", "Food Not Bombs" and, simply, "No War".

Police presence was, predictably, heavy with EIGHT riot vans placed in front of the banners and therefore blocking peoples' view.
Activists responded to this act of political repression by crossing the road from Parliment Square to the House itself, which was met with violence from the state, as the police began to assault one comrade and usher the rest back across the road. Then, following brief discussion, the cops agreed to move their vans.....then there were four.....then there were two.....

So as the rain came down, leaflets were handed out reading:
"Why we are here: we gather taoday -one week on from the terrible events in the US- in solidarity with those, ourselves included, who live in fear of NUTTERS like BUSH and BLAIR and to fully oppose any further acts of violence. We as humanitarians cannot deny that the deaths in the US were disgusting and pointless, but we must resist any acts of retalliation that can only result in more bloodshed and suffering. We urge you to join us in condemning all violence and help us to create the peaceful world we all want to live in."
and...
"Western Hypocrisy: Loss of life on such a scale is not new and has largely been spomsored by the US and other Western nations: in Hiroshima, Vietnam, East Timor, Iraq, Ruwanda and the Balkans we have seen the loss of millions upon millions of innocent lives in the most horrific circumstances imaginable, yet the Western media either ignored or acted with glee at the acts of state sponsored terrorism, kept realities from the public and propagated the Humanitarian Intervention Myth!"

The response from the public was, as to be expected, mixed and at times volatile, though on the whole extremely positive.
On one occassion an irate American woman began screaming at activists and proclaiming how she hoped their families died horrible deaths. She was unable to be reasoned with and finally left, still screaming about killing our families. This, is, of course, an emotive issue and one that brings many to the boil, though, counter-acting the views of the angry lady, was one of thanks for us being out in the rain, when an American couple agreed with our stance.

Activists remained at Parliment until around 6pm when they left for Downing st to join an ever growing crowd for another vigil. Around 3/400 people attended in all. Some made speeches, waved flags, meditated, shouted...

The cops, taken by surprise at the numbers, hastily constucted a pig pen for people to go into, and although most did, this was resisted by some who refused to be treated like animals and instead wandered around it, leafleting and talking to the public.

At 11pm there were still people down Whitehall with candles, and this opposition can only grow into what will be an effective movement against the inevitable massacres about to be carried out by our psychopathic leaders.

Love and Rage...

reclaim the streets
- e-mail: upsetter@hushmail.com

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

Irony

19.09.2001 15:48

Ignoring the exceptionally poor spelling and syntax, I can only assume that this piece is meant ironically or is just the ramblings of some right-wing conspiracy theorist! Since when was the bombing of the WTC a ‘so-called terrorist attack’? And as for police vans blocking the view being an example of political repression, perhaps you should travel to other countries where political repression would mean far more than your interesting banners being obscured.

Paul Edwards


humbug too late 1

19.09.2001 16:56

lets face it 1 war 3 aboutto break out, so forget peace, chums

orion noir


ello ello ello

19.09.2001 23:01

Good evening officers. Can we see your warrants.

;-)

Mustermann
mail e-mail: spam@spam.spam


Hello again RTS

20.09.2001 00:21

Make sure you post all future events here, give lots of warning. Welcome to Armageddon.

Good luck

MADlive.com
mail e-mail: MADlive.com


Paul Edwards and his like......

20.09.2001 09:07

What's the matter with people - especially Paul Edwards. Why do people feel it's neccesary to explete such vitreol against others basing an arguement on their spelling skills!! - it's ridiculous and smacks of an intense ignorance on your part about other people backgrounds and education. Grow up and learn a bit of respect......

Paxman


not humbug, but too late for sure

20.09.2001 15:26

To call it 'humbug' as the above comment is a bit unfair, but there is certainly an air of too late about this. All the time we were panicking about GAP and Macdonalds, the real players were moving behind the wings. NOT SO SUBTLY EITHER ! What about NATO in 1999 ? Odd how that entire experience was 'forgotten': I even found myself looking at old paper clippings to remind myself it ever happened, talk about 'double think'. I seriously suspect that the assembled 'humanitarians', the 'drop the debters' and 'globalise resistancers' wwere part of a smokescreen of some kind to keep our attention distracted...
I personally imagined that in retrospect the NATO 99 action would be something of a Spanish Civil War, a kind of overture and prelude to something much, much bigger, which i thought would involve Russia (and of course it could get dragged in). I announce my temporay retirement until the real movement loses its posers and hangers-on as I referred to above. A year on from now, we will see whos who ...

Auguste


comment

20.09.2001 20:42

I'm sorry but police obscuring the public's view of protest banners IS political repression.

It may not be as bad as the kind of political repression you get in places like Iraq but it is repression none the less. Just because the activists weren't being tortured doesn't mean that they should consider the Police's actions to be acceptable. YOU sir, may accept your lack of freedom but do not tell others who wish to persue justice that they shouldn't bother just because it's not as bad here as it is in other places. We should not aspire to be more totalitarian. We should aspire to greater freedom and a fairer world. Never should we accept the level of injustice in the world and be happy with the way things are. We must always strive to build a better world.

Henry K.


What spelling mistakes?

20.09.2001 20:49

on my second reading I managed to find one typo (spomsored), no syntactical errors and precisely zero spelling mistakes. I often come across articles that lack spelling precision, the mistakes are pretty obvious, but in this article, if there are any then there are certainly so few that I didn't manage to spot any, not even when I was actually looking for them.

So I don't know what Mr Plod is on about, quite frankly.

More to the point, where indeed IS is warrant?

Dave


Peace-loving american

25.09.2001 20:22

As a U.S. Citizen I fully agree with the stance of non-violence. It is ridiculous to call the taking of more lives
'infinite justice'. There is a frightening cloud of blood-lust in my country, and I am part of the minority that is willing to even consider that this attack was provoked by
U.S. infinite injustice.

Tim Leibfritz