.............Yet again prove that their arrogance is only exceeded by their ignorance in such matters.

Who gives a flying fsk about anything apart from the fact the Terrorists have taken out several thousand people, many of whom are normal office clerks, cleaners, etc, etc.

Such crass comments and contradictory statements are what we were expecting you all, and lo & behold, you did not disappoint us.

I take it from the ignorant comments here that you approve of yesterdays action, showing support for the murder of thousands of people? You have ZERO right to support such actions, forget religion of any form, your support of this is 100% anti-social. If it was a few thousand Beagles in the WTC you'd be screaming blue murder, but as it is only humans that were killed (innocent kiddies as well) then, Hey!, who cares.

Personally, I agree that whoever has commited this act of terrorism needs to be wiped off the face of this planet. I also happen to think that all of you need to understand that it is not your actions that causes offence to "normal" people, but is it that humming, unwahsed urine/bo smell that cuases most offence.

Now see what you've done, I've reduced myself to your pathetic level of logic.

Get your thumbs out of your arses, take your minds out of neutral, and get a grip on reality.

GFAB, FOAD & HAND

Radge

Centre/Right and fsking proud of it.!!!!

the only ting i iz outraged at iz the excessive saturation and coverage of such corny tripe on the box, over and over again bushes ugly mug and shrivelled up cia fbi warmongers, they need to get a fukin grip and stop fundin and financin neonazi muslim fanatics. they might hav thought it were a good idea at the time, to fund and back the taliban against the russians, but it is provin a costly and dangerous folly of the most stupidest kind. thatchers government actully sold the arms and nuclear warheads to neo nazi despot saddam. backin neonazi fanatic idiots has prove a extremely foolish stance, just becos they were paranoid and wanted russia to loose in afganistan. its time to wise up and stop fundin neonazi terrorists just becos theyll be our allies, its the same wif the DUP they hav the word democratic in their party name but they are neonazi binky old boy establishment arselickers, they are bound to turn into wacko waco nuts. i think i can speak for most ordinary members of the public, we really dont give a monkeys nuts about the twin dicks or watever they r called, they r an prime example of shoddy capitalist cutting corners workmanship and the bastards who built it shud be sued.

I utterly condemn this attrocity, by the NWO, nothing will be achieved by "wiping anyone from the face of the Earth." You obviously condone more slaughter of innocents.

 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE5/index.html

acts of wanton stupidity shud never be condoned, but i do not wish to partake in the mass media orchastrated hysteria, the like of which was last seen at the funeral of lady di. i think on this planet there is no such thing as innocence. many more innocents are slaughtered in africa everyday, so to condemn this act we must also condemn the slaughter of the worlds poor and helpless at the hands of more rich global neonazi right wing fanatics who are just the same as osama bin laden, in fact they are his paymasters. lest we not forget osama bin laden is a millionaire, it wud not be the first time the ordinary workers of the world hav suffered at the hands of the ultra rich meglomaniacs, mr bin laden

Which UK RIIA expert said a cell within the US security establishment must have been responsible, what were his exact words, and where and when did he say it?

If it's true, it would be very significant.

The Royal Institute of International Affairs 'expert' on terrorism, I can't remember his name, but I videotaped ALL the news coverage on the 11th. so I will find it, said, Osama Bin Laden could not have co-ordinated or orchestrated this attack, it is more likely the work of a cell within the USA. He was interviewed on the BBC, Sky and ITV. I will reveiw my tapes, it must be in there.

A word about Pearl Harbour. The DID know about the attack on Pearl Harbour. The moved all their most modern warships out the way and left the older ones and a few thousand sailors to die in the attack.

They then achieved support from the US public to join the war.

This all seems very relevent - a war is a great antidote to a recession. They've also been failing to get conscent from the rest of the UN for their continued sanctions/bombing/war on Iraq.

Not suggesting that they knew about this attack however.

The US did not know about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance. If you think it did, please supply references.

What relevance does this have to these other attacks?

Sceptic

mY PROBLEM IS THAT THE SATELITE PHOTOS OF THE PENTAGON DO NOT APPEAR TO SHOW IMPACT FROM A PLANE, A SMALL AMONT OF THE EXTERNAL WALL HAS BEEN REDUCED TO RUBBLE AND NO OTHER DISPLACEMENT OF WALLS SEEM TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE. fIRE DAMAGE HAS TRAVERSED SOME OF THE INTERSECTING STRUCTURES, BUT NO EVIDENCE OF WIDESCALE IMPACT DESTRUCTION.
tHE TIME LINE ,PUBLISHED ON ANOTHER SITE STATES WARNINGS GIVEN 3/4 MINUTES BEFORE THE EXPLOSION AND ONE WITNESS NEAR THE SITE OF THE EXPLOSION REPORTS BEING KNOCKED OFF HER FEET, iF A PLANE CAME DOWN ,WAS IT A 747?, SHE WOULD NOT BE IN A POSITION TO BE REPORT THIS.
WHY NO PICTURES OF THE TREASURY EXPLOSION?
i AM JUST PUZZLED.