Tactical discussion
Dave Lee Travis | 30.08.2001 10:45
Anyone care to come up with some ideas around the following questions.
1) the anti-capitalist groups in this country, either anarchist, trotskysist or whatever, do not seem to have grown at all in the past 10 years, despite the emergence of the anti-capitalist movement. why is this?
2) the current anti-globalisation/anti-capitalist movement has been plastered all over the TV and press. why does it seem to have so little resonance with the wider public, despite the fact that the questions raised affect everyone?
3) what are the relative merits of reformist and revolutionary approaches to capitalism?
1) the anti-capitalist groups in this country, either anarchist, trotskysist or whatever, do not seem to have grown at all in the past 10 years, despite the emergence of the anti-capitalist movement. why is this?
2) the current anti-globalisation/anti-capitalist movement has been plastered all over the TV and press. why does it seem to have so little resonance with the wider public, despite the fact that the questions raised affect everyone?
3) what are the relative merits of reformist and revolutionary approaches to capitalism?
Dave Lee Travis
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
Brief Answers
30.08.2001 14:15
Ok I am 23 and I moved 3 years ago to Britain so it is difficult to compare with 10 years ago but it seems to me that:
1) There are now more groups (for example Reclaim The Streets) with more members each.
2) Your question should be, "Why is it that the anti-globalisation/anti-capitalist movement is claimimg more supporters all the time from the wider public despite all the negative propaganda against it in the media?"
3) The relative merits? mm the forming of an equal society and the preservation of the enviroment.
Any more questions?
Lampost
Links with Sub-Proletarian Groups
30.08.2001 15:23
Anon