Skip to content or view screen version

UK: Chicken drug residue poses health threat

justfood.com | 05.06.2001 19:50

Levels of potentially dangerous drug residues in chickens destined for the dinner table may well be higher than suggested by government figures, according to a new report by organic farming group the Soil Association. From the government report's own author who disagrees with government's spin on the issue: “Despite repeated assertions by regulators that nearly all poultry products are free from detectable residues, figures show clearly that about 20% of chicken meat and 10% of the eggs tested contain residues of drugs deemed too dangerous for use in human medicine.”


[According to the report, however, several drugs used to treat parasites raised serious potential health problems for human consumers. Nicarbazin, which was found in 18% of chicken livers tested and in about 2% of eggs, is believed to cause birth defects and hormonal problems in animals. Lasalocid meanwhile is not even licensed for laying hens, but it was found in one in every dozen eggs and about 12% of chicken muscle. It is believed to damage the heart. Dimetridazole, which is suspected of being able to induce birth defects and cancer, is licensed for use in ONLY turkeys and pheasants, but had been found in one in 200 chicken eggs in 1999.]


UK: Chicken drug residue poses health threat
04 Jun 2001
Source: just-food.com editorial team


Levels of potentially dangerous drug residues in chickens destined for the dinner table may well be higher than suggested by government figures, according to a new report by organic farming group the Soil Association.

The Ministry of Agriculture (Maff) maintained that there has been no attempt to mislead the public, and stressed that of the samples of chicken meat it tested last year, 99.5% were free of any drug residue.

In a statement, Maff said: “It is important to stress there has been no attempt to mislead or misrepresent any figures. All test results are fully reported every year and have been since 1995 […] The residues mentioned in the Soil Association report were all found at levels well below World Health Organisation safety limits.”

GOVERNMENT'S OWN REPORT AUTHOR CHALLENGES GOVERNMENT'S STATISTICAL SPIN TO CONSUMERS

One of the report's authors, Richard Young, has challenged the government's statistics however, commenting: “Despite repeated assertions by regulators that nearly all poultry products are free from detectable residues, figures show clearly that about 20% of chicken meat and 10% of the eggs tested contain residues of drugs deemed too dangerous for use in human medicine.”

ANTIBIOTICS, PARASITE TREATMENT, LIVER ACCUMULATION, UNLICENCED DRUGS FOUND AS WELL

Drugs such as antibiotics are routinely employed by poultry farmers to treat sick birds, prevent disease or promote growth. According to the report, however, several drugs used to treat parasites raised serious potential health problems for human consumers. Nicarbazin, which was found in 18% of chicken livers tested and in about 2% of eggs, is believed to cause birth defects and hormonal problems in animals. Lasalocid meanwhile is not even licensed for laying hens, but it was found in one in every dozen eggs and about 12% of chicken muscle. It is believed to damage the heart. Dimetridazole, which is suspected of being able to induce birth defects and cancer, is licensed for use in turkeys and pheasants, but had been found in one in 200 chicken eggs in 1999.


British consumers eat over 750m chickens every year, low prices and red meat food scares meaning that chicken accounts for nearly 40% of all the meat sold. An independent Veterinary Residue Committee has been established by the government to investigate the issue further.


GO ORGANIC OR DIE

justfood.com

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

other Maff news

05.06.2001 19:55


UK: Maff under investigation for animal cruelty during FMD culls
04 Jun 2001
Source: just-food.com editorial team



The foot and mouth crisis is no excuse for the inhumane treatment of animals, stressed the RSPCA this week as it investigated reports that ill-equipped Maff slaughterman bungled a cull at Barras Farm near Kirkby Stephen, Cumbria.

The owner of the farm, Alan Alderson argued that the cull of his herd of 25 cows, one bull, 25 calves and one pregnant cow was mismanaged. They were slaughtered as a precaution after a Maff lorry passed through a road in their field while carrying infected carcasses from a Stricegill farm.

Anderson said that rather than pen the animals in, the men killed the cows then spent three hours chasing their distressed calves around the field in a four-wheel drive vehicle, while taking pot-shots at them with a shot gun through the window.

A spokesman for Maff commented that the cull had indeed been "far from ideal [but] these were semi-wild animals on the farm, and the vet and the marksmen knew it was going to be a difficult job when they turned up. All but two were shot and killed instantaneously, and these two were killed by the second shot." He added that a complaint had been lodged.

Neighbours who witnessed the cull spoke of their distress to the Sunday Telegraph newspaper. Jean Hutchinson commented: "They shot all the mothers and the calves were just rushing up and down. They are not wild animals and they should never be treated like that."

Ann Alderson said: "We saw a four-wheel drive vehicle racing around the field and a cow being chased, and my husband Johnnie saw two cows actually being shot from the vehicle. Those poor calves were just terrified.

"This is typical of the way Maff is working now. We got the impression that they were getting a bit of a kick out of it."

Mark


Animal Sacrifice

06.06.2001 13:25

So is anyone going to be prosecuted by the RSPCA for this cruelty? I'd be banned from keeping animals for forgetting to feed my goldfish! And cows were slaughtered as a precaution after a Maff lorry passed through a road in a field while carrying infected carcasses from a Stricegill farm...so MAFF are spreading this disease and causing healthy beasts to be destroyed and ruining farmer's livlihoods? That's criminal!

Maff