Skip to content or view screen version

Riots in Northern Ireland - Press look the other way

townie | 28.05.2001 00:12

On Saturday, there were serious clashes between nationalists and police in the Portadown area of Northern Ireland. 57 police were injured by a hail of petrol bombs, 'acid bombs' (according to the bbc) and missiles in the Garvaghy road, after protestants made their yearly provocative march into a nationalist area. Police fired 6 plastic bullets at the protesters.

On Saturday, there were serious clashes between nationalists and police in the Portadown area of Northern Ireland. 57 police were injured by a hail of petrol bombs, 'acid bombs' (according to the bbc) and missiles in the Garvaghy road, after protestants made their yearly provocative march into a nationalist area. Police fired 6 plastic bullets at the protesters.

Most years I can remember, any incidents this large were reported as the first story on the news across the uk and ireland. The most coverage that I saw on tv was channel 4 news giving it as a news in brief, with no footage. The bbc website carries a single page of coverage, with a picture of some policemen standing next to a van. Given the carnage so briefly described, this hardly compares to 'Oldham riots in pictures', a page on the same website giving a montage of the mess left behind.

So what's going on? Can the press only handle one riot a day? Or do I smell more media fiddling...

Interestingly, someone raised the point of the riots and the lack of coverage it received, on the radio. The presenter said that perhaps the press had just got bored of the NI situation, that more petrol bombs were nothing new. I could possibly have believed him, if it wasn't for the main story on the bbc news at the start of the election, declaring a huge terrorist threat to london and the uk from the 'real IRA'.

This was used as a reason to place the whole of london under armed guard from our friends at the metropolitan police. Are these 2 things all of a sudden completely disconnected?

If my worst suspicions are true, then perhaps they are...

townie

townie
- e-mail: cant_cope@hotmail.com

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Weird

28.05.2001 01:52

Yeah I thought it was strange that this story was tucked away on Ceefax and didn't get a mention on BBC News, especially considering the high number of police casualties. The whole of the mainstream media went nuts about the march last year but they don't seem interested this time.

Lemming
mail e-mail: lemming@grandtheftcyber.com


Media control?

28.05.2001 15:10

In the past few months, I have been noticing these anomalies, particularly regarding foot and mouth, but mayday and other news 'items' as well. It seems to me that the press, whilst not actually censoring stories, still has a control over the mainstream opinions in this country.

For example, a lot of people think foot and mouth is over and done with. Even MAFF will have you believe that it is restricted to a few areas. However, MAFF are killing more animals now than they were at the 'peak' of the crisis 2 months ago!

Such blatant irregularities between fact and media are obvious only if you go looking for them. Most people don't bother and so the news becomes 'the reality' for everyone who wasn't there. This is quite troublesome to me. It has seemed like deliberate collaboration between the gov. and the press at times, but at others it looks like plain old press lazyness and their acceptance of whatever bunch of lies the met/maff/whoever feel like churning out.

Either way, it is a disservice to all of us.

townie
mail e-mail: cant_cope@hotmail.com


Incitement and censorship

28.05.2001 15:30

The tide of protest is turning...ugly, and they are afraid to report it, but the government got what they wanted from Oldham, a front page picture for the Sunday Times of an Asian 'immigrant' (third generation) being led away by police, who Blair says, "don't deserve this kind of attack."
They are determined to make race, law and immigration an issue in this election.

Jim'll Fixit