Skip to content or view screen version

New Labour's secret plans revealed by newspaper.

Grauniad. | 16.05.2001 10:28

New Labour document leaked today reveals secret plans to privatise just about everything for the benefit of globalisation-friendly multinationals, carpet-baggers and fatcats.

A leaked report by Blairite (read: Thatcherite) think-tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), was published today in 'The Guardian' newspaper under the headline 'SECRET REFORM AGENDA REVEALED'. The strapline (that bit in bold print underneath the headline ran: PUSH TO PRIVATISE BIG AREAS OF HEALTH AND EDUCATION.

The IPPR document was drawn up by Martin Taylor - chairman of multinational corporation WH Smiths - who banned left wing publications such as 'The Morning Star' from their shelfs, have never stocked any anarchist / radical publications, and backed down from publishing a book that was slightly critical of Stepehen Byers, after the capitalist muppet made an unenforceable threat of sueing for secondary libel.

The article contains the following, revealing, paragraph:

"Mr Taylor, the brains behind Gordon Brown's first wave of tax and benefit reforms, asserts: 'The secretary of state for health has said he would be astonished if the private sector played a larger part in the NHS. He should be astonished, and soon.'

Scumbag. Do you think he has to use the NHS? No way.

Heads down for another four years of crypto-Tory privatising, neo-liberal policies and gorging by fatcats and multi-nationals? OR a concerted effort to make those who own, sorry run, the country realise that they've sold out the people to profit?

I read a post here a few days ago about picketing the New Labour party conference. We have to do that, but that's in September - shouldn't we do something before then? Or should we just grit our teeth and touch our toes again?

Grauniad.
- e-mail: letters@guardian.co.uk

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

what then ?

16.05.2001 11:37

Yeah, fair point, we shouldn't wait till September but what can we do ?

Mass protests in London don't seem like a very good idea, small ones get no publicity (even the 3000 protesting about the terrorism act last week), what else is there ?

The small actions on May Day were excellent. Is anyone going to be up for trying them or similar actions again without the countries media eyes everywhere and the cops too busy putting their riot gear on ?

I don't want to encourage people to give up or to despair but what can we do ?

Are the people who don't vote (about half the country isn't it?) just apathetic or is it a quiet protest about the shit state of things ? In other words, would they be up for joining in if they were presented with an opportunity to really change things ?

Trying to be positive, lets assume they'd be up for it. We therefore need to create such an opportunity. Any ideas ?

eyes


Ideas - a few, quick solutions - none.

16.05.2001 15:42

The 'what can we do' point is a fair one and not neccesarily negative. Politicians always condemned those false elections that they used to hold in places like Russia and stuff. As there was only one party, the whole thing was a sham.

Is Britain any different today? The two parties aren't really that different, there's Facism, and then there's Facism-lite (with added spin).

However, it's not all doom and gloom. Politics may a shit sandwich of greed at the moment, but we should remember one thing: PROTEST MOVEMENTS CAN SUCEED!

Do I detect a some doubt out there? How about The end of arpatite in South Africa, or the eight hour work day, the right to Unionise, Women's votes, equal rights, the right to a trial by jury, etc, etc, etc. All of these advances cam about solely because there was a band of people - protestors - who believed in what they stood for and would not be dissuaded or discouraged by all the bullshit, lies, and sneers.

So, we know protest can work - when does it succeed?

I've read up on this a lot over the last couple of years, and it strikes me that all succesful protests have had a two-pronged approach:

1) Some amount of real or threatened 'violence'
(i.e. damage to property)

2) Popular support - being seen as being on the 'right' side

Those in power have always been able to stand one of the above two components. Riots in Brixton failed to get much done because it was percieved and sold to the people as destructive youths and criminals running amok. The non-violent diarmament movement - CND - never suceeded despite having popluar support from many people, because the authorities felt that they could simply 'ride the storm' - which wasn't really a storm, just people staging sit-ins.

However, to gain popular support, any 'radical' action needs to be seen as seperate from the movement as a whole, otherwise the moral high ground is lost and support simply falls away.

So, if you agree with what I've said above then the only questions are: What action, how & when? and how can we get popular support?

As to the action side - that's to be decided by the people themselves on sites such as this one. As to gaining popularity - we need to sell the movement as a popular groundswell of opinion and pay attention to how the media portrays us and what we can do to improve it. IT SUCKS, I know, but we'll only get the numbers we need if we can get people to realise that it's us that are the ones who care, and the government and corporations who rape, pillage, and oppress.

Peace.

P.S. Nothing in this article should be taken as an incitement to do anything. Tony Blair's dismantling OUR health service and selling our schools to corporate brainwashers - but just stick the kettle on and have a cup of tea, there's a good boy/girl. (really)

Tinman.


Making a difference,

16.05.2001 17:49

Ha ha!

Jack Straw jeered at by his own beloved boys in blue, Tiny Blair bollocked by some poor woman whose husband had been waiting for a hospital bed and best of all, William Hague barracked by protestors.

Superb. It may be fiddling whilst Rome burns, but I loved it! Just to see the wall of shite being broken down once or twice is a real pleasure.

By the way - how do these people know where the party leaders are going to? Is there anyway of finding out?

Any info gratefully received.

Conrad Black.


Prescott Shows True Colours.

16.05.2001 20:26

Call me psychic, but I predicted that very soon these losers wouldn't be able to show their two-faces in public outside of an armoured van. Now, do unto politicians as they do unto you, and lamp them square on their chinless, arrogant faces.

Psychic