Skip to content or view screen version

Mayday Media: Police propaganda in Guardian

wake up john | 16.04.2001 08:34

Spot on analysis from Letters page in today's Guardian - Mon 16th April 2001 - prompted by police/media campaign - and John Vidal's "Fluffies on the run as spikies win battle of the streets - May Day mayhem?" article two days ago( http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4170353,00.html)

Mayday for capitalism
Guardian

Monday April 16, 2001

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4170884,00.html

John Vidal and Nick Hopkins show what happens when journalists allow the Metropolitan police to set the news agenda (Mayday Mayhem?, April 14).

In the absence of actual information about the May Day demonstrations they echo the self-fulfilling prophecy of the police - violent thugs have taken over and peaceful protesters are staying away, with the result that "ordinary people" and "families" will be too frightened to attend. A relentless media campaign over the past few weeks, coupled with increasingly aggressive police announcements, is plainly intended to divide anti-capitalist activists and criminalise protest. But "ordinary people" and "families" are the anti-capitalist movement. We are part of society, not apart from it. We are your neighbours, the people you sit next to on the bus, in the park, in the housing office.

The whole point of the May Day demonstrations is their diversity - that there will be many different types of protest happening. There is room for all sections of the anti-capitalist movement to choose their own direction on the day.

No doubt there will be some demonstrators, embittered by the pollution, violence and exploitation of global capitalism, who will break windows in revenge. There will also be many more demonstrators who will be organising positive activities, parties and music that celebrate our worldwide resistance. The "call to action" asks everyone to choose their own way. Its not a secret society, but a very open one.

The police have demonised May Day since the very first demonstrations were called in the 1880s, and if the police want a fight they're sure to get one, but that's not the point of the protest. The anti-capitalist movement is a broad coalition, and the wider the police's net is cast, the more "ordinary" people are caught in it. We have something to say and we're not frightened to make our voices heard.
Jim Bradley
Red Star Research

• Special branch briefings concerning May Day have two purposes. First to discredit the anti-capitalist movement and deter demonstrators; and second, to prepare public opinion for a violent police crackdown.

The police will no doubt be delighted at the May Day features in the Guardian, which seemed designed to aid their cause. Whatever the opinions of Guardian readers on violence at demonstrations, it is the right to demonstrate at all that is under attack.
Phil Blake
Porthcawl, Mid Glamorgan

• Contrary to Edmond Warner's belief (Capitalism takes a hit in the media, April 14), it's not "anti-capitalist" schadenfreude that has pushed Marks & Spencer and other companies into the media spotlight but market demand, fuelled by two important social trends.

First, companies affect our lives far more than ever before, especially as more services are transferred from the public to the private sector. The public increasingly feels it has a right to know how businesses function.

Second, people realise that they can now influence how businesses behave. The balance of power is shifting from shareholders to customers, partly due to the web and other technologies that enable people to mobilise public opinion far more easily, quickly and effectively.

This shift contributed to the downfall of Monsanto in Europe and to Shell's Brent Spar volte-face and forced Pepsi and Ericcson out of Burma, among a growing number of examples. These developments might not conform to tidy business school models of economic rationality - but life is a messy business.
Keith Conlon
London

wake up john
- Homepage: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4170884,00.html

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

hasnt someone mentioned this ?

16.04.2001 14:21

hasnt someone already given some possible police tactics a couple of days ago ?

1: general haranguing of likely protesters before they can get ready
2: arrest of anyone wearing a political uniform. ( eg, wombles, ya basta, swp &c)
3: arrest of anyone marching within a mile of the parliament ( trades unions, the percussion band that shows up, so on)

politic-critic


Divided Movement and now a Left 3rd Way ?

16.04.2001 16:06

If the movement is as divided as the Guardian (guardian of what ?) suggests, this might explain the rise of the dreadful GLOBALISE RESISTANCE, a bizarre alliance between the Monbiot Ultrafluffies and our old chums the SWP. Er, what ? No, I cant work it out either, but tis terrible. Its like they're trying to build a THIRD WAY group within the left. Well, what can you say about it ? Its not anarchist, or socialist, no workers in it (quite the opposite) and its certainly not dedicated to democractic principles: Any speakers striking a dissident note are silenced, quite ruthlessly. Avoid this crew.

Vince Eremos


stop moaning Vince and do something.

16.04.2001 16:42

How do you know there are no workers in Globalise Resistance anyway? As far as i'm aware it is open to anyone fighting globalization. Got a better (broader) organization have you?

The Weaver


At least Globalise Resistance = Direct Action

16.04.2001 18:46

At least Globalise Resistance will be on the streets on Mayday - a non violent peaceful direct action against the world bank building in london starting 1-2pm - then following on to Oxford Street - can't say fairer than that.

PS
- Homepage: http://www.resist.org


Guardian article journo training with cops

17.04.2001 11:57

 http://www.mediaguardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,7558,473584,00.html

Nick Hopkins the Guardian journalist jointly resposible for Saturday's police propaganda in the paper about Mayday crops up again on PAGE 8 OF Media Guardian 16.04.01. There is a photo of him -which everyone should mug up on for when the creep comes round on Mayday asking when the rocket launchers arrive - but the whole piece is his account of a riot training weekend for journalists he has just taken part in organised by the Metropolitan Police and a private security agency of ex-coppers and SAS. The training is because of the 'increased amount of anti-capitalist protests' and Nick is jolly grateful for all the kindly help from the Met. The cops wouldnt expect any favours in return of course other than to write out their entire thoughts on Mayday disguised as an independent journalist. So it's official - Guardian journalists trained by met in
media lies and riot control. I rest my case.
===========================================

NB maybe the journo should worry more about the cops on mayday and their "zero tolerance" approach, rather than protestors...

maybe he should talk to danny penman from the independent who had his arm busted by the cops at Euston in london on N30

maybe he should talk to other journos atacked by police in this country, or how about prague, or seattle or etc etc

(or indeed Quebec....)

-
- Homepage: http://www.mediaguardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,7558,473584,00.html


Dear Guardian re fluffy / spikey

17.04.2001 12:18

Dear Editors,

You do the global movements for environmental and social justice no favours with your tabloid-style expose, "Fluffies on the run as spikies win battle of the streets" (Saturday April 14 2001). This double-page spread, based largely on hearsay and ill-informed police statements, seems to form part of a wider police and establishment campaign to deter people from celebrating May Day in London, on Tuesday 1st May 2001.

The same pattern seems to be emerging as did last year -- you are reporting a "riot" before it has happpened; even though last year it didn't happen for most people. Most people who joined in last year's May Day events were not involved in violence or property destruction.

There is a strange irony here. If it were not for the supposed threat of [police] violence, no doubt you would not have wasted 2 pages on this "news," your pages dominated by images of police attacking property and --apparently-- newspaper photographers.

Contrary to popular belief, the majority of people who attend these events do so peacefully; of political conviction, and because they want to try and build a better world.

Through the Press, the police have sought to identify anyone who wishes to celebrate, demonstrate or protest on May Day as a "violent troublemaker," and your newspaper has joined their crusade.

Your "reporters" John Vidal & Nick Hopkins revel in supposed "fueding": within Reclaim The Streets. Whilst you are happy to criticise those involved in organising and participating in these events, you do not extend such criticisms to the police.

Why?

The police expect fewer than 2,000 people to turn up, and yet all police leave has been cancelled and upwards of 5,000 police will be on duty. Last year, we were told that the army were on standby. At least three police forces, plus MI5 and Special Branch are involved in "intelligence" gathering for these events.

How much money is this costing the tax payer, and is this money well spent?

Your reporters use the words of 2 people involved in previous events to sum-up the mood of anti-capitalist feeling: asupposed "rift" between "fluffies" and "spikies". How representative are these views of other people who will take action on May Day?

Rather than covering the issues (Haymarket martyrs; globalisation of capitalism; low wages; villification of asylum seekers; privatisation; destruction of the environment & indigenous peoples) and encouraging peaceful protestors to attend these events, your newspaper has chosen to ally itself with police tactics of "divide & rule" and to join in the right-wing policy of portraying all those concerned with global and environmental justice as 'violent thugs'.

You do the global movements for social and environmental justice no favours with your pro-police reporting.

What would the founders of your great Liberal newspaper think of you now?

repost


More reaction to Guardian article

17.04.2001 12:29

Letter NOT sent to the Guardian, 14th April 2001

To the Editor,

The articles on the planned Mayday festivities are depressingly misguided. Your correspondents would have done better to subscribe to one of the many discussion lists (including the Guardian's own) which contain information about planned events, as well as debate around all areas of interest. Ideology, methodology and security all feature prominently. Separate discussion groups include one focusing solely on the use of non-violent and violent means of attaining an end? which is better?

So what is wrong?

Mayday this year may contain acts of violence against property and police (- perhaps even instigated by the police, for they have openly announced their intention to act quickly and aggressively), yet the proposed format for the day does not support this. A multitude of small, autonomous actions are planned, each identifying with each other under the broadest umbrella, each focused on their own agenda? Policing will be difficult using current tactics, as there will not be a body of people to target. Likewise, `anarchistic thugs' will not have the cover of peaceful protest by which to gain access to property.

Instead, London is poised on the edge of chaos ? by design. It is time to pay attention. Giant veggie-burger giveaways and critical mass cyclists, building hotels on Mayfair, street theatre at the World Bank?

Behind all this are many groups. The idea is a celebration of the worker, and the way we all interact with our world. Currently, there are many problems in this world, all of which can be improved upon: poverty, inequality, poor health, poor housing and homelessness, illiteracy and so on. In 1948, the World Health Organisation defined `Health' as a state of "complete physical, mental and social
well-being, not just the absence of disease." The key factor in all of this is, simply, the world we live in today: the way the environment is changing and the way our social interactions occur.

We must continue the struggle for change!

-


Police Propaganda

19.04.2001 09:36

Guardian allows some more right to reply type stuff...

May Day protestors accuse police of using propaganda
Matthew Tempest, political correspondent
Wednesday April 18, 2001
 http://politics.guardian.co.uk/insidebritain/story/0,9141,474768,00.html


Organisers of the forthcoming anti-capitalism protests in London today dubbed reports of planned violence in the capital as "Met police propaganda".

Scotland Yard warned this week that protestors have been using US camps to train in civil disobedience, and that they intend to occupy a London landmark building for weeks after the event.

But a Reclaim the Streets organiser, "David", who refused to give his surname, hit back. He said: "The police know it's a quiet time at Easter for the media, and so are getting their defences in first.

"It was exactly the same last year, when the 'guerilla gardening' May Day protest was planned. The police told everyone the protestors were using the idea of planting trees in the road as a cover, and would come with pitchforks and spades. That didn't happen.

"The police spent millions of pounds and months of planning on the operation - and yet conveniently 'forgot' to close the McDonalds on Whitehall, right in the centre of the demonstration against capitalism, which was inevitably going to be a target.

"They have to justify their budgets and manpower, so it was very helpful for them that after eight peaceful hours somebody went and graffitied the cenotaph - it justified all their work."

"More than 5,000 people turned up for that demonstration, it went on all day, and about 20 people turned nasty and violent - and even that was only after riot police sealed off Parliament Square and refused to let anybody in or out."

Another protestor - who has no part in organising the event - said: "There is violence orchestrated by the Turkish communists who turn up at these events looking for trouble, but the police don't seem interested in infiltrating them. The real violence is committed by the multinationals we are protesting against."

Mayor Ken Livingstone - who last year supported the right of the May Day protestors to demonstrate - has this year urged people to stay away from the event.

Since last year, the police now have the power under the Terrorism Act 2000 to force peaceful protestors to remove scarves or balaclavas hiding their faces.

Last year's demonstrations in Parliament Square and Trafalgar Square turned ugly after several hours of peaceful protest in the centre of Whitehall, which saw sods of grass planted on tarmac roads and cannabis seeds planted in flower beds across from the House of Commons.

A McDonalds restaurant was vandalised and slogans were daubed on the cenotaph in Whitehall. A strip of lawn was also placed on a statue of Winston Churchill, giving him a green mohican haircut.

This year's protest - which will take place on Tuesday May 1, a working day - is being called Monopoly May Day. A large procession down the heart of Oxford Street, London's busiest shopping street, is planned, although in an effort to confuse the police, few specific details are being discussed.



-
- Homepage: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/insidebritain/story/0,9141,474768,00.html


Security antics in Dublin M&S

24.11.2004 22:24

Their security gets tough (for ten-year-olds)
See-
 http://www.indymedia.ie/newswire.php?story_id=67628

M&S watcher