Skip to content or view screen version

Huntington forced overseas for financial backing

Dan Anchorman | 15.08.2000 18:03 | Cambridge

Huntinton Life Sciences, the firm which has supplied up to 500 animals a day to laborotories across the UK, is facing increasing financial difficulties. The company has today (15 Aug) announced it will be sourcing financial support in the USA after no backers in the UK and Europe could be found.

Huntingdon Life Sciences, the research company targeted by animal rights campaigners, has turned to the US for financing after it could not find a British or European bank to fund its work.

The identity of its new backer is being withheld to protect staff and shareholders from the type of aggressive campaign levelled at previous bankers, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and National Westminster Bank, the company said yesterday.
“Lots of banks around the world wanted the business,” said Andrew Gay, Huntingdon’s marketing director. “What came with it, especially for the high street banks, was the publicity.”

The group, which runs Europe’s largest vivisection laboratory, said several banks were either unwilling to shoulder the risk of being associated with Huntingdon, or had not offered the long-term lending it sought.
Over the past year, Huntingdon has been subjected to unprecedented pressure by animal rights groups, who have targeted its staff, shareholders and financial backers in an attempt to undermine its share price and, ultimately, drive it out of business. “There has been a heavy campaign against the company and its financial backers,” Mr Gay said. “NatWest were being targeted … that switched to RBS.”
NatWest initially provided a two-year overdraft for Huntingdon, first for £24.5m, then for £22.5m, due to expire this month. When the clearer was taken over by RBS, the Scottish bank opted not to renew the facility beyond October.

Both banks attracted protests by animal rights campaigners, who object to Huntingdon’s experiments on live animals.
Under yesterday’s deal, Huntingdon will sell and lease back its Cambridgeshire base and its Princeton Research Centre in New Jersey to the unnamed US group. The 20 to 25 year deal, which also includes a $15m lending facility, was brokered by FHP Realty, a private US investment firm that is “affiliated” to Huntingdon directors.

An RBS spokesman declined to comment on Huntingdon’s case, citing client confidentiality.

Wendy Higgins, campaigns director for the British Union for Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) said: “Huntingdon is going to find it increasingly difficult to find finance and investors.”

BUAV, which did not support tactics of intimidation to achieve its aims, “looks forward to the day when Huntingdon closes,” Ms Higgins said.

Huntingdon shares yesterday closed unchanged at 8.75p.

(Re-printed from the UK Independent newspaper).

Dan Anchorman
- e-mail: N/a
- Homepage: N/a

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Huntingdon Life Sciences The Economist

22.08.2000 08:04

Huntingdon Life Sciences, a drug-testing group harried by animal-rights protesters, was forced to turn to its American lenders to secure a £34m ($51m) financial lifeline. The debt refinancing comes after a month-long campaign against the company, during which the company’s directors and staff received death threats.

az
- Homepage: http://www.economist.com/editorial/justforyou/current/index_ww3872.html


Huntingdon Life Sciences The Economist

22.08.2000 08:04

Huntingdon Life Sciences, a drug-testing group harried by animal-rights protesters, was forced to turn to its American lenders to secure a £34m ($51m) financial lifeline. The debt refinancing comes after a month-long campaign against the company, during which the company’s directors and staff received death threats.

az
- Homepage: http://www.economist.com/editorial/justforyou/current/index_ww3872.html


Help me!

30.08.2001 21:13

I find the subjugation of animals so violently offensive that I am literally on the verge of vomiting (or needing to lie down). How is it that vivisection is accepted in our global society? Can someone please help me even see an opposing opinion regarding acceptance of this practice. I'm out of my mind with grief, like someone at the wailing wall.
Life is one giant wailing wall.

Penny Powell
mail e-mail: avidpenny@hotmail.com
- Homepage: pennypowell.com


Why torture

03.09.2001 04:56

I used to live near Huntington....viva the ativist that give those A### H### hassel day in and out going to work...it makes me so angry that ther is still torcher in the name of humanity going

this is sick it has to stop

Cindy
mail e-mail: earthfilms@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://www.treesit.org


terrible

30.08.2003 20:48

we all know that nothing we will say will change what is going to happen, where i go as a volunteer there were fields, but we now have empty factorys that will be filled for some time, then no good, owing to the factor that lets bild and then we can use the workers, and then its good for the county, no its not.
we will not for some time stop all off these cruel things that we do, as we give money to the breeders, folk that clean the kennels, folk that feed the dogs, etc., its money and money talks, hey we still are going on about Diane, how she died,....as if we will ever know, its lip service, while folk are ready to hurt animals for money we will do it, just look at china, those bears kept in cages for their bile for some man to feel like a man......honest to god, (did i say god) sorry mistake there, mind you, i have been off work for some time and have you watche Tricia, so what do we expect, we give folk that have loads of kids and then just got to sign up, good for them they have all four by four, sky, holidays, free treatment, so why should they work

sally
mail e-mail: cornishblueeyes@yahoo.com