Censorship ? what about the story of the nude protest in hyde park ?
autonomous contributor | 25.08.2000 15:41
Indy UK may have grudgingly restored some non existent articles, but there are still others missing, including one about a very successful action by the Camapaign to be Nude In Public.
Such an action directly confronts the fundamental prejudices of the political order. But of course, the SWP type pro- Labour left would not support it. Why ? Because it might offend the christianised trades unions.
We have lost all interest in Indy UK, it behaves PRECISELY as the Labour party. Does it require deep insight to realise that a massive sophism is taking place among the british left ? Dont make the blunder that Marx did in the 1850's, [and which he only snapped out of after the uprising in Paris, a predominantly Anarchist and Blanquist action], a blunder which mistakes a mass of workers with a revolutionary movement. Britain never had a succesfull revolution, and i really feel you've allowed yourself to be duped by such 'moonie-leftists' as the SWP or supporters of Ken Livingstone. Perhaps you've spent too long in the Students Union bar, retorting 'GROW UP' to anyone who tried to explain to you the true role of Britain in the oppression and exploitation of millions worldwide?
Comments have disappeared too; one outlines how the false-trotskyite left in Britain have smeared his reputation and reduced his intellect to an 'orthodoxy', a falsity, just as Stalin did to |Lenin, and Bernstein did to Marx himself.
Another points to the re-emergence of the COMMONWEALTH as a vessel for the blatant revival of Britsh imperial interests. Or did Indy UK think it was a cricket club ?
Above all, Indy UK has shown just how far from the thinking of true radicalism it really is, and just how many questions it refuses to allow to be aired.
We have lost all interest in Indy UK, it behaves PRECISELY as the Labour party. Does it require deep insight to realise that a massive sophism is taking place among the british left ? Dont make the blunder that Marx did in the 1850's, [and which he only snapped out of after the uprising in Paris, a predominantly Anarchist and Blanquist action], a blunder which mistakes a mass of workers with a revolutionary movement. Britain never had a succesfull revolution, and i really feel you've allowed yourself to be duped by such 'moonie-leftists' as the SWP or supporters of Ken Livingstone. Perhaps you've spent too long in the Students Union bar, retorting 'GROW UP' to anyone who tried to explain to you the true role of Britain in the oppression and exploitation of millions worldwide?
Comments have disappeared too; one outlines how the false-trotskyite left in Britain have smeared his reputation and reduced his intellect to an 'orthodoxy', a falsity, just as Stalin did to |Lenin, and Bernstein did to Marx himself.
Another points to the re-emergence of the COMMONWEALTH as a vessel for the blatant revival of Britsh imperial interests. Or did Indy UK think it was a cricket club ?
Above all, Indy UK has shown just how far from the thinking of true radicalism it really is, and just how many questions it refuses to allow to be aired.
autonomous contributor
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
IMC UK apology
25.08.2000 18:41
Apologies. IMC UK.
IMC UK
e-mail: imcuk@indymedia.org.uk
manipulation?
26.08.2000 02:44
which one is the comment outlining "how the false-trotskyite left in Britain have smeared his [ken livingstone's?] reputation and reduced his intellect to an 'orthodoxy'"?
and which comment is pointing to "the re-emergence of the COMMONWEALTH as a vessel for the blatant revival of Britsh imperial interests"?
have I just missed them or are you manipulating the discussion here?
as you haven't posted an email address please state this publicly as you seem to be very concerned with what's going on on this site.
andi
andi
e-mail: AndiArbeit@ziplip.com
reply to andi
26.08.2000 18:38
Ken has only smeared his own, not that he cares.
The Autonomous One
lost interest?
29.08.2000 14:31
Aaron