The ceremony in Swindon was slightly delayed whilst a press photographer herded the attendees into place for a group photo, but got underway within a few minutes of its allotted 6pm start. “Blair has got his century” read an improvised placard, as the names, ages, dates, locations and causes of death were read to the assembled people, passers-by and local print and TV journalists.
This ceremony was very similar to one held in the same place almost a year earlier, with the exception that last time, the names of fourteen hundred victims of the war, of all nationalities, were read out over the course of an hour, and eighty-five pairs of boots were set out in orderly ranks in front of the cenotaph to represent the British soldiers who had died in the war up to that point. See http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/02/305339.html
Some opposed to the ongoing war and occupation in Iraq have questioned whether it is appropriate to mark the deaths of 100 British soldiers in this way when over one hundred times as many Iraqis have been killed in the same conflict. Does it mean we think that a British person is worth more than an Iraqi? Of course not. But every death from this unnecessary and illegal war is a tragedy, regardless of nationality, there was no need for any of them to lose their lives. The people who are dying are not the people who supplied the lies which led to war.
The peace campaigners were surprised at support from an unexpected quarter. On the newsstands, alongside the latest lurid revelations about celebrity Big Brother contestants, the Daily Mail’s front page was taken up by a photo of cpl Gordon Pritchard, accompanied by the headline “How many more Mr Blair?”, and the Daily Express’ front page announced “Our 100th soldier is killed for a lie”. Neither of these papers is exactly renowned for their sympathy with peace and social justice campaigners, although following the Mail’s coverage of Maya Evans’ conviction for participating in a similar naming-the-dead ceremony outside Downing Street, I guess anything is possible. See http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/12/329440.html?c=on#c137295
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
why comerate scum like that
02.02.2006 11:35
no sympathy should be given to them please remove this post
its a memorial to a bunch of killers
==
re: why comerate [sic] scum like that
02.02.2006 21:44
The soldiers aren't the ones to blame for the war (although I think they should be held accountable for their individual actions), and they don't all agree that they should be in Iraq in the first place. For example, Allan Douglas, the 99th to die - his mother said to the BBC:
"It wasn't his war. But as he said, he's in the army, that's his job. Allan's been in Iraq for a couple of months now, he was home at Christmas for a fortnight. He did not want to go back this time - he'd seen enough the first time he was over. But as he said, he's in the army, that's his job. He said it was a waste of time people being there, he just really didn't like it at all. I did not want him to go there at all - it wasn't his war. We were not very happy that he had to go there. I think it's a damn disgrace, they should not be out there at all. I do not think Tony Blair should have put any young kids out there - there's been so many of them killed. He could not wait to get into the army, he thought it would be a great life, make a career out of it. Obviously it did not work out that way for him."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4665620.stm
For anyone interested in this debate, Danny's contribution to the comments at http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/01/332632.html are recommended reading.
Simon
Blair's Army
07.02.2006 22:01
Blair could not send in an army if no one had signed up now coud he?
Anna Kissed