kyoto smiles? yea or nay?

For release 15 February 2005

KYOTO: WHAT'S TO CELEBRATE?
Activists Put Kofi Annan on Notice

While many are celebrating the Kyoto Protocol’s entering into force this
week, others are finding cause for grave concern.

A coalition of NGOs, social and environmental activists, communities,
scientists and economists from around the world concerned about the
climate crisis, the Durban Group, charged that the 1997 climate treaty not
only fails to cut greenhouse gas emissions enough to avert climate
catastrophe, but also steals from the poor to give to the rich.

The Kyoto Protocol says that industrialized country signatories must
reduce their emissions 5.2% below 1990 levels by 2008-2012. However, the
group noted, the scientific community has called for global reductions of
over 60% below 1990 levels.

What's more, the carbon trading promoted by the Protocol hands Northern
governments and corporations lucrative tradable rights  use the earth’s
natural carbon-cycling capacity, effectively stealing a public good away
from most of the planet's inhabitants.

Just last month, Danish power utility Energi E2 sold hundreds of thousands
of dollars of the rights it had been granted free by its government to
Shell after mild temperatures kept the utility's carbon emissions below
expected levels.  No such free rights have been granted to ordinary
citizens.

The Kyoto Protocol’s attempt to create 'carbon dioxide-saving' projects in
poorer countries is meanwhile stirring protests from Brazil to South
Africa. Such projects - which include industrial tree plantations and
schemes to burn off landfill gas - are designed to license big emitters in
the rich North to go on using fossil fuels. But they usurp land or water
ordinary people need for other purposes.

'We're creating a sort of "climate apartheid", wherein the poorest and
darkest-skinned pay the highest price—with their health, their land, and,
in some cases, with their lives, for continued carbon profligacy by the
rich,' said Soumitra Ghosh of the National Forum of Forest Peoples and
Forest Workers in India.

Worse, such carbon projects don't work. 'Even in purely economic terms, a
market in credits from 'carbon-saving' projects will fail,' said Jutta
Kill of Sinkswatch, a British-based watchdog organization. 'You simply
can't verify whether a power plant's emissions can be 'compensated for' by
a tree plantation or other project. Ultimately investors are bound to lose
confidence in the credits they buy from such projects.'

Kill noted that almost all of the methods proposed so far for proving how
much carbon is saved by Kyoto's 'carbon-saving' projects have been
rejected by the UN itself. 'People are beginning to realize that this is
ENRON accounting,' she said.

Ricardo Carrere of the World Rainforest Movement added that 'so-called
carbon sink plantations will result in the further spread of monoculture
tree plantations, which are already having enormous impacts on people and
the environment. The Kyoto Protocol also allows genetically engineered
trees to be used in carbon-absorbing plantations. 'This will open up a
Pandora’s box of impacts we can’t even guess at,' said Anne Petermann of
Global Justice Ecology Project in the US.

One of the biggest promoters of the carbon market, including
'carbon-saving' projects in poor nations, is the World Bank, ironically
also a major financier of fossil fuel developments.

'It's ridiculous that the Bank, which has a mission of entrenching the
fossil fuel industry, is now advertising itself as solving the climate
crisis,' said Nadia Martinez of the Sustainable Energy and Environment
Network in Washington.

'If we are to avert a climate crisis, drastic reductions in fossil fuel
investment and use are inescapable, as is the protection of remaining
native forests,' confirmed Heidi Bachram of Carbon Trade Watch. 'We're
joining many other movements of Northern and Southern peoples to take the
climate back into our hands.'

Members of the Durban Group are today sending an open letter to UN
Secretary-General Kofi Annan excoriating the UN's failure to take
constructive action and giving notice of their intention to build
independent alliances to  'press governments to limit fossil fuel
extraction and use while supporting grassroots alliances struggling
against fossil fuel exploration, extraction and use and against unjust
'climate mitigation' projects.'

For further information/interviews:
Heidi Bachram (UK) +1 631 477 8653,  heidi@carbontradewatch.org,
www.carbontradewatch.org and www.carbontradewatch.org/durban.
Ricardo Carrere (Uruguay) +598 2 4100985 or 4132989,  rcarrere@wrm.org.uy,
 http://www.wrm.org.uy.
Soumitra Ghosh (India) +91 353 2661915,  nespon@sancharnet.in,
Sajida Khan (South Africa) +27 31 208 9223,  rafiquee@telkomsa.net. Jutta
Kill (Germany/UK) +1 250 799 5888,  jutta@fern.org, www.sinkswatch.org.
Larry Lohmann (UK) 01258 473795 or 821218;  larrylohmann@gn.apc.org,
www.theconrerhouse.org.uk.
Nadia Martinez (US) +1 202 234 9382, x208,  nmartinez@seen.org.
Winnie Overbeek (Brazil) +55 27 33226330 or 32237436
 winnie.fase@terra.com.br.
Anne Petermann (US) +1 802 482 2689,
 globalecology@gmavt.net.


NOTES FOR EDITORS
 1. Carbon Market Daily, 7 Feburary 2005, www.pointcarbon.com.
 2. For interviews: Winnie Overbeek, Sajida Khan, Soumitra Ghosh (above).
3. SEEN, Wrong Turn from Rio, www.seen.org.