This is the first time that the SNP, which calls for Scottish withdrawal from the United Kingdom, has been the largest party in Scotland.
Labour, whose 50-year reign as the largest party in Scotland was ended by the May 3 election, nominated its leader Jack McConnell as first minister, but with only 46 votes was unable to beat Salmond. The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats, with 17 and 16 MSPs, respectively, abstained in the vote, enabling the SNP to form a minority government.
Making his acceptance speech in Holyrood, Salmond was at pains to emphasise the “Scottish national interest” and the need for “consensus.” Brushing aside the divisions between the parties over independence that had dominated the election campaign, he insisted that Scotland had a unifying sense of identity: “We have a sense of ourselves, a sense of community and, above all, a sense of the ‘common weal’ of Scotland.”
Beyond this nationalist humbug, Salmond was making an appeal to the other parties in Holyrood on whom he will rely over the next four years. He stated that he would “appeal for support, policy by policy, across this chamber.”
In particular, the SNP are looking for backing from the Liberal Democrats, who have refused to join Salmond in a coalition government because of their opposition to holding a referendum on independence. Appealing to the Liberals, who favour increasing the powers of the devolved parliament, Salmond stated that “there is a broad consensus on the need for this parliament to assume greater responsibility for the governance of Scotland.”
Due to its minority status, the SNP administration is unlikely to advance its separatist agenda too vociferously at this point, preferring to use the demand for independence as a bargaining tool for increased powers at Holyrood.
The Scotsman newspaper commented May 17 that “to satisfy his party” Salmond would propose a white paper on independence. In the meantime, the SNP’s main aim would be “seeking consensus on more powers for Holyrood” and perhaps urging “Westminster [the UK parliament] to hand responsibility for oil and gas to Scotland.”
Most urgent for Salmond is to honour the SNP’s commitment to push through major tax breaks for big business—a pledge supported by nearly all the parties—while retaining the allocation of a relatively high level of funding granted to Scotland by the UK Treasury.
The Greens, who also favour Scottish independence, have agreed to a semi-formal coalition with the SNP, in which they will vote for the SNP’s budget and support Salmond in a confidence motion in exchange for chairmanship of a parliamentary committee.
Paul Tetlaw, chairman of the environmental pressure group TRANSform, said the Greens had failed to gain any serious concessions on transport policy from the SNP. “By agreeing a deal with the SNP, they have chosen to side with a party committed to cancelling public transport projects in order to subsidise new road-building. Those who have worked so hard for improvements to our public-transport system to benefit the environment and public health will be saddened by the Greens’ decision,” said Tetlaw.
Greenpeace welcomed the SNP/Green alliance for its supposed potential to turn Scotland into a “world leader in renewable energy.”
The Greens have sought a coalition with the SNP for several years, and were in serious negotiations with them in the run-up to the election. Salmond and Green leader Robin Harper have both called for an alliance of “progressive forces” in Holyrood, which is usually taken to include the Liberal Democrats, who have been in coalition with Labour for the last eight years. A spokesperson for the Greens criticised the Liberals’ refusal to form a coalition with the SNP saying, “Even with only two MSPs, we’re still prepared to talk but the Lib Dems seem to have gone off in a huff. It’s very disappointing.”
As well as the Greens and the Liberals, the SNP will look for support from the Conservatives and even Labour, especially for their policy of slashing local business tax from 27 percent to just 20 percent and increasing the number of police officers.
Despite the inability of the SNP to form a working majority with the Liberals, the tone in Holyrood was remarkably conciliatory, with all the party leaders congratulating Salmond and stating that they would strive to make the new parliament work.
The day after Salmond was voted into office the parliament voted to accept the SNP administration he nominated, consisting of five other senior ministers and 10 junior ones. The SNP and the Greens supported the vote with Labour, the Liberals and the Conservatives abstaining.
This is a reflection of the shared pro-big business agenda of all the parties. The SNP represents sections of business, including major financial institutions, who believe they would profit more by pulling out of the UK and establishing direct relations with transnational corporations and the European Union. But the party is in agreement with Labour, the Liberals and the Tories that in the meantime every effort should be made to cut taxes and public spending while increasing spending on “law and order” measures.
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
Greens and Greenpeace support SNP shocker !
23.05.2007 21:27
Danny
Oh Danny boy...
24.05.2007 11:50
Rich
Rich as in Rich Bastard ?
24.05.2007 15:30
I wouldn't put it that strongly. How is apartheid doing in South Africa nowadays by the way ?
"Do you really consider yourself a socialist while spouting about the announcements of 'the English' (bourgeoisie) regarding nuclear power?"
Apart from not having declared myself a socialist, why should a socialist 'spout' about the announcements of the bourgeoisie ?
"I'd have thought you'd be more concerned for your working class comrades in England and elsewhere"
Did you now ? And did you just assume I'm working-class ? What a weird person you are.
Scotland refusing to build new nuclear plants is good for Scots, but it is also good for everyone, especially our close neighbours in England. England building new nuclear plants, that is a different matter. At least the English working class now have an example to follow.
Danny
Freedom for Tooting!
25.05.2007 11:36
It’s abolished. However, SA still stands as a sad example of the failure of the nationalist perspective (unless you believe that apartheid was all that was wrong there).
“Apart from not having declared myself a socialist, why should a socialist 'spout' about the announcements of the bourgeoisie ?”
Pardon the assumption, you seem to post a lot on a generally socialist website. I was pointing at your use of ‘the English’ as if the whole nation were declaring their desire to build nuclear plants. The announcement is from a small wealthy minority, as you know.
“And did you just assume I'm working-class ? What a weird person you are.”
The vast majority are working class, so it was a reasonable guess, especially in the context of the website. If you’re neither working class nor a socialist then your support for the SNP is clarified. Don’t know why the ‘weird’ bit was necessary. I simply don’t think that nationalism is the way forward.
Rich (but poor)
Freedom for Tooting - seriously
25.05.2007 22:03
>It’s abolished. However, SA still stands as a sad example of the failure of the nationalist perspective (unless you believe that apartheid was all that was wrong there).
Apartheid wasn't South Africas only problem but it was the major problem. It fed, and it's legacy still feeds, many of the other problems there. And it is a good analogy with Scotland I feel, if
somewhat extreme. Most of Scotlands problems are fed by being subsumed in the UK.
>Pardon the assumption, you seem to post a lot on a generally socialist website.
This website ? Is generally socialist ? I hadn't noticed. This place seems to be generally anarchist to me. I don't subscribe to the argument that you have to be a socialist to be an anarchist. I'm not sure I'm not a socialist but I haven't ever claimed to be - how about you, how many seemingly different labels fit you occasionally ?
>I was pointing at your use of ‘the English’ as if the whole nation were declaring their desire to build nuclear plants. The announcement is from a small wealthy minority, as you know.
Who all generally own shares in Nuclear stock and hate 'furriners'. Fair enough
>>And did you just assume I'm working-class ? What a weird person you are.
>The vast majority are working class, so it was a reasonable guess, especially in the context of the website.
Fair enough. I'm partly peasant class though so if you start getting all Stalinist on me I'll get Maoist on yer arse ;-)
>If you’re neither working class nor a socialist then your support for the SNP is clarified. Don’t know why the ‘weird’ bit was necessary. I simply don’t think that nationalism is the way forward.
The route to a destination often has to take many directions. Nationalism for Scottish people is a route away from NATO and US-led wars, away from nuclear power, away from dawn-raids on asylum-seekers. Our struggle up here doesn't end with independence, in many ways that will be just the start. Until then it is a struggle for national liberation that most good English socialists would support if we were a third world colony.
>Rich (but poor)
Sorry if I was a tad strong, there is a Scottish 'Rich' who winds me up. If you genuinely live in Tooting, then I seriously support 'Freedom for Tooting' and think you should seriously support it too rather than joke about it. After all, in the Tooting Arms you have the best pub in London. If you were just having a dig though, I do think power is best dissolved as locally as possible. For us in Scotland, the first step is independence from Westminster. We are not being anti-English, we are being anti-UK - and we have good reason to be you must admit.
all good things,
Danny