QUOTE
New Labour New Terror (not that the Tories would be different)
UNQUOTE

The above sentiment explains why both Hitler and Blair maintain power after first achieving it.

Being a socialist, in a sane world I would hate the Conservative scum being in power, but here's the point. Our democracy, like it or not, is based on the two party system. This system ONLY works when the party out of power dedicates its every living second to fighting the party in power.

The fight is predicated on the idea that the two parties, in some way, represent opposites.

Now why is Blair so powerful, and so dangerous in his ruthless mass murdering evil? Because Blair leads a party that has been manipulated by Kinnock onwards to be vastly more right wing than the traditional Tory party. The extreme right wing flavour of Blair's New Reich party is, of course, identical in nature to Hitler's National Socialism (which in its first rate provision of many services to the working classes DID have the right to allude to some left wing ideas- not that Blair provides first rate anything).

Now, with the final rise to power of Blair years back, our two party system formally ended. The core of the Conservative Party leadership consider Blair the best leader they have EVER had.

Consider, if you will, the Conservatives in power at this time, with, say, a vile racist zionist like Michael Howard, as Prime Minister. THE LEFT WOULD BE GOING BERZERK. Anti war protests would look like the worst of the poll tax riots multiplied by ten thousand. The Conservative majority would be next to nothing, and their ability to pass foul new laws none existant.

WHY DIDN'T WE GET A POLICE STATE UNDER THATCHER. Because, even with her technical majority in parliament, the opposition against her in the nation was significant, angry, and prepared to act powerfully. Any attempt to act against Blair is rapidly neutralised by his own agents (many of them long time so-called left-wing activists) that take leadership roles in the protest groups.

IN THE UK, AN UNSTOPPABLE BUTCHER LIKE BLAIR CAN ONLY ARISE FROM THE LEFT.

How long would it take to build a NEW LEFT movement to fight Blair? The answer, sadly, is too long. The greatest chance was with an anti-war party that fought across all seats in a national election. Look up the number of seats that RESPECT actually fought, and then be sickened by the realisation that Blair wins easily by having his allies lead OUR movements into the ground.

In the US, the two party system has also died, but this time under somewhat different circumstances. However, while the Democrat party was falsely portrayed as a party of the left, it was, of course, originally the party of SLAVERY. However, today, the force that pulls both US parties together is the support of the racist terrorist state of Israel. Blair's future partner, the depraved monster Hillary Clinton, and the lunatic megalomaniac Arnold Schwarzenegger both took the opportunity to celebrate the Israeli Holocaust against Lebanon by saying that EVERY member of their state supported Israeli atrocities.

The two party system was about opposite forces producing some kind of sane equilibrium. In both the US and UK, official political forces now all push in the SAME direction, moving us to ever greater extremes.

QUOTE
A ceasefire can never be too early
UNQUOTE

Ah yes, the old "peace in our time" cry. Certainly worked with Hitler, didn't it (how many ceasefires were arranged AFTER Hitler had gained military advantage in his pre-WW2 campaigns).

BLAIR WANTS YOU TO DEMAND A ISRAEL-REWARDING CEASEFIRE.
-What Blair doesn't want is a demand for nuremberg trials for every Israeli responsible for CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY (and the numbers would run into hundreds of thousands of Israelis). Remember, the Serbs are on trial for crimes in Kosovo a fraction as evil as Israeli crimes in Lebanon/Gaza/West Bank
-What Blair doesn't want is a demand for all CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, and NUCLEAR weapons to be forceable removed from the hands of the racist terrorist Israelis.
-What Blair doesn't want is a demand to compensate all the millions of victims of Israeli terrorism at LOCKERBIE LEVELS.
-What Blair doesn't want is a demand to dismantle the depraved racist state of Israel, just as the depraved racist state of apartheid South Africa was dismantled.
-What Blair doesn't want is a demand that all those that have financed and glorified Israeli terrorism in the UK (including those in the mass media) be punished.

A CEASEFIRE THAT REWARDS THE ISRAELIS WOULD BE AN OBSCENITY AFTER THE HOLOCAUST THEY HAVE CARRIED OUT AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE LEBANON.

That Blair is having his mass media manipulate people into supporting actions that will benefit the Israelis is certainly true. However, remember that Lebanon to Blair is just a small stepping stone to his real goal, the GENOCIDE of Iran. Blair and Israel have had their holocaust of Gaza and Lebanon planned for more than a year. Blair gave Israel the green light to launch the most evil provocations against the poor people of Gaza, including the massacre on the beach, the mass murder of doctors that had rushed to the aid of victims of an Israeli terror missile strike (usual Israel tactic of striking the vehicle from the air, watching and waiting for a crowd of helpers to appear, and then firing a second missile into that crowd), and then kidnapping two brothers in Gaza.

Blair's intent? To use his excellent relationships with the Iranians (remember, Iran Invaded both Afghanistan and Iraq alongside the US, and this was co-ordinated in London) to persuade them that a limited military response to Israeli terrorism would cause events making a US strike against Iran far more difficult.

Of course, Blair and Iran knew that because Israel and its supporters across the globe represent the most evil and depraved ideology known to man, namely that of the 'master-race' (same as the nazis), Israel is ecstatic over any excuse that gives it the excuse to mass murder members of 'inferior' races. So, like Adolf Hitler before them, Israelis say "our soldiers can butcher any number of your civilians at any time, for any reason, but if you attack just one of our soldiers, this gives us the duty to mass murder unlimited numbers of your civilians."

The taking prisoner Israeli terrorists in reprisal for Israeli atrocities, and the use of said terrorist prisoners for gaining the freedom of the victims of Israeli rape, torture, and murder camps is an act of the highest moral quality, and I cannot praise it highly enough. That the real purpose of such acts was to give Israel an excuse for something Israel was planning for anyway, and would have done sooner rather than later, is a moral complication frequently found in the twisted world of politics.

What we should be thinking about is where Blair goes from here. The Iranians have allowed themselves involvement precisely to stop an attack against their nation. Blair believes they have accelerated his war plans. At the least, Blair is following the principle that if you can't light the big fire directly, try lighting as many small fires as possible. However, most major nations seemed to have ruled themselves out of a UN force in Lebanon (not hard to guess why), which seems to rule out a Blair false flag attack on 'valuable' (how racist is our world) UN personnel down there.

The most likely scenario is that Blair gets the dribblers to support an Israeli-Holocaust rewarding ceasefire (Israeli gets to keep its rape/torture/murder camp victims, Israel gets to steal a massive chunk of Lebanon, and Israel gets to have Lebanon stripped of forces that can resist it, so the next Israeli Holocaust against Lebanon can be vastly more effective), which, of course, the people of Lebanon will not accept. Thus the dribblers have their protests completely neutralised, while the current Israeli Holocaust of Lebanon (and Gaza) intensifies. At some point Israel and Syria clash (both are very carefully avoiding this at the moment- Israel DOES NOT want war with either Syria or Iran WITHOUT official US involvement). The clash with Syria escalates, until Iran is involved. AS SOON AS IRAN BECOMES INVOLVED, THE US WILL ATTACK SYRIA AND IRAN. Bingo!

I know some of you hate the way I dismiss half-assed, Blair-helping, attempts at protest, but let me ask you this: How much forgiveness can we have for the mother that refuses to think, and kills her baby by putting it in a bath of excessively hot water? Is her response, "I was trying to do good by keeping my baby clean" acceptable?

In the early days, Adolf Hitler LOVED ceasefires that recognised the military advantages that his depraved actions had gained for the nazi cause. With each of them, Hitler's military leaders grew more approving of Hitler's leadership and planning. Is this really what you want to demonstrate on behalf of?

It is the word 'ceasefire' I object to as a rallying cry. "End the Israeli Holocaust of Gaza and Lebanon" should be the rallying cry.
"Punish EVERY Israeli war crime".
"Nuremberg 2: the trial of Blair and Israel",
"Blair planned the slaughter of Lebanon",
"Blair glorifies ALL Israeli terrorism"
"Blair and Hitler- Two faces of the same evil"

IS IT SO HARD TO SPEND A FEW SECONDS TO FIND A POWERFUL A DAMAGING FORM OF EXPRESSION AGAINST BLAIR, AND HIS GROWING LIST OF AGGRESSIVE WARS? Is it so hard to reject the advice of Blair's agents, and make a protest effective. Don't listen to officials in the UK that claim to speak on behalf of the Palestinians or Lebanese either.

Here's a puzzle for you. The Palestinians can declare a state at any time. Why don't they? Because the Israelis will act worse than they are doing- yeah right. The answer is simple. Those Palestinian leaders (mostly outside Palestine) are PAID by Blair and the US on behalf of Israel NOT do do this. CORRUPTION IS THE OLDEST OF EMPIRE TOOLS. All the nice harmless protests thus arranged on behalf of Palestine obey the dictates of people that couldn't give a damn about the fate of ordinary Palestinians.

LET YOUR HEART BE YOUR ONLY LEADER. Then let your mind serve your heart by forging the most powerful written and verbal weapon possible.

You know the protest I dream of? Well, it is the protest that the BBC and Ch4 News doesn't dare show one image of, because EVERY placard contains slogans that eviscerate Blair and Israel. A sea of righteous anger, expressed as powerfully as possible. Good seeking to demolish evil.