According to their final diary entry (see link below), the judge spent the morning re-characterising the findings of the Inquiry as matters of "policy discretion" rather than Fact.
Details aren't given but that would seem to include such matters as:
- increased "community severance"
- increased CO2 emissions, contrary to their stated policy objectives.
- increased traffic, contrary to wanting to reduce them.
The end of the legal action leaves it open for work to begin on the road extremely soon, given that certain road-promoting interests seem to have carried on regardless.
See also:
![](/img/extlink.gif)
Comments
Display the following 2 comments