This sort of 'playing down' did seem to be a big thing. People shouting, chanting and signing got a bad reaction, on one occaision a group of Methodist Church members starting singing fairly loudly and, as if by pure chance, the police helicopter came overhead, then, presumably realising that these were merely young people concerned about the lack of action on poverty worldwide, headed off again.
This kind of paranoia seemed to pervade the whole policing of the event. It appeared that the police were determined for a silent march (not the first time in recent months that police have redifined 'peaceful' as 'silent'). Many of the usual suspects for megaphone operation were missing from action or simply hadn't brought their equipment with them for fear of having it nicked. Apparently children shouldn't be exposed to chanting, it makes an event "unfamily-friendly".
But there certainly was hope. Many home made banners were more strongly worded that the official placards, some "Christian Aid Grannies" holding banners which read along the lines of "less words, more action", others portraying the G8 as part of the problem.
But perhaps the most interesting time came when handing out Dissent's Make History: Close the G8 leaflets, as many people swarmed to get their hands on them, causing some crowd flow problems (unfortunately, I had only 200 and ran out very quickly. Getting rid of SchNews was also relatively easy, with some folk seeming quite excited at seeing it again (presumably having seen it some time back).
So all in all, there were cracks within the facade of 'respectability' and 'family friendlyness', the rhetoric which had pervaded all the literature beforehand. Not everyone is willing to fall in line and be silenced so that Geldof can talk sweetly to Blair, and then, when Blair fails to suceed, go on supporting Blair.
But ultimately, on first impressions at least, this demonstration failed to radicalise so very many of the protesters, and there was neither the clear (but horrible) leadership shown on Stop the War marches, nor the impetus to be one's own leader. If, as expected, the G8 hob-nob sesh fails to do anything less than further Africans' Suffering, we can expect nothing more than a few vaguely harsh words and mumbles of "we did our best"; no sign of any build up for revenge against the continuing injustice we were all meant to be protesting about.
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
A different perspective
03.07.2005 19:47
john
How dare the common people crash our activist party?
03.07.2005 22:59
NK
inclusion...
03.07.2005 23:57
I also feel that 'activist' attendence at these type of mainstream mobilisation ought to be a little bit more creative. Why the necessity for huge blocs ? Surely that is a tactical coming together for a purpose, of intent, not really necessary on yesterdays march. If people were staggered over a wee bit of the march, close enough for communication, then surely the possibility of written and verbal communication exists along and between groups of people and maybe opportunities can develop to radicalise the crowd through instantaneous action/reaction.
Were talking crowd psychology and its something we can exploit, look at Football fans, footage of popular uprisings in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union to get a hint of some of the group dynamics. We will only learn from studying the subject in more depth.
hill walker
An Unusual Interpretation...
04.07.2005 16:25
Let us be quite clear - in the Black Bloc N30 communique, the words "you do not speak for us" featured quite prominently when discussing the bureaucratic NGO community. Well I'm afraid it works both ways. The reason Schnews and what have you was distributed widely was simply because people, being offered hundreds of placards and articles on the way to the Meadows, will simply take some of them as momentoes, and little more.
The depictions of police helicopters hovering to "silence" chanters are figments of the reporter's over-active and conspiratorially-minded imagination. I found the police to be both convivial and friendly on Saturday. This is because (again) it doesn't work to simply reduce the "police" to a depersonalised agent in thrall to capitalism.
I also thought that the Revolucion members dressed in red at the end of the log stretch leading out of the Meadows looked like the usual middle-class types turning their own rage at their own background and childhood identities into some ludicrous "the time has come to smash capitalism" nonsense. It's encouraging that people are able to analyse (and thus feel uncomfortable with)their own backgrounds, but it would be far better to simply find a way to live with that rather than disavow it by subsuming the Self in some pre-ordained mission to "radicalise" people who quite simply don't want it and find it deeply patronising to be told that we "don't really understand what's going on."
Simply my own take on the situation, I speak for myself an nobody else. Thank you.
John