Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

Heavyhanded police tactics lead to blockade and arrests on Make Poverty History

Caroline | 02.07.2005 22:20 | G8 2005 | World

Indiscriminate use of the riot squad led to a minor incident - when a small group of protesters on the make poverty history march decided to talk an alternative route - being escalated into a major standoff, with at least a hundred riot police and several hundred uniforms (including the Met Police Forward Information Team) blockading Buccleugh Place for 2.5 hours.

Eventually a S60 was declared over the whole of the City Centre and the Meadows, allowing Police to arrest those protesters who refused to show their faces to be photographed.

Some of the Scottish force in particular were very scared, particularly of the Clown Army, fluffy though we know they are.

What have they been told that we are likely to do to them?

Photos at:  http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/07/315582.html

Caroline
- e-mail: carosinclair@yahoo.co.uk
- Homepage: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/07/315582.html


Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Not indiscriminate

02.07.2005 23:51

The targetting of that particular group was NOT indisriminate and entirely predictable. The group involved were many the london posse fwho travelled up together on the dissent train and included the wombles and various other 'usual suspects'. The deployment of the officiers from the MET and the use of FIT photograhers from London was NOT some random coincidence and the 'bloc' refered to did not simple decide to take an alternative route.

It is SO obvious that a group of people dressed in black would attract massive police attention at a NGO demo where most people were wearing white.

It is SO obvious that trying to go off on an autonomous ramble as a black bloc would not be something the cops would willingly allow.

The cops have learnt a great deal over the last ten years. It's about time we learnt too and developed our tactics.



gg


Don't be conned by the police.

03.07.2005 06:10

Section 60 advice

At some recent demonstrations, police have cordoned off the demonstration, corralling large numbers of people into an increasing confined area before taking their names, addresses and photographs, eventually releasing them one by one. This was done under the obscure Section 60 of the Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 (originally designed to prevent minor football disturbances).

The S60 order is a new police tactic at major demonstrations used effectively to control, subdue and gain personal information about protesters despite having the extraordinarily limited power simply to "Stop and search in anticipation of violence".

Its effectiveness in the past was due to the fact that no-one knew just exactly what powers the police had under S60. As it turns out, they have very few powers.

In the event of an S60 order being issued these are the important things to remember: The police have the power to search you for weapons (and dangerous instruments). They have no other powers under S60. They can only detain you "for as long as necessary to carry out a search".

They have no legal power to force you to give them your name and address. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES give it to them: it will be kept on file for SEVEN years. When asked, say "NO COMMENT".

They have no legal power to force you to have your photograph taken. Do not allow them to do this. This too will be kept on file for SEVEN years. Keep your head turned away, or put your hand in front of your face.

They have no legal power to ask you to remove any item of clothing in public view, OTHER THAN that which is concealing your identity. Any facial masking can be confiscated.

If you are asked to remove coats/jumpers etc, REFUSE OUTRIGHT. They have no legal power to search wallets, purses, inside small pockets etc. This is an S60 search, for weapons only. If they ask to search wallets, purses, inside small pockets etc, REFUSE OUTRIGHT.

If you have a bag they will search that, but again for weapons only. Any other items, documents, potentially incriminating articles are OFF LIMITS.

Do not allow them to examine any of your personal possessions (cash cards, student cards, diaries, organisers etc). This is not part of S60. Under Article 8 of the UK Human Rights Act 1998 your privacy is assured. Make sure they know this. They can only confiscate weapons and facial masking.

They have the power to use "reasonable force" but ONLY if you do not submit to a search. No other force can be used for any other purpose.

They must tell you their name, number, station they're based at the reason for the search. Ask them for this. Not only will it piss them, off but if they don't provide this information the search will be illegal. Remember: in an S60 situation, you are accused of nothing and you have done nothing wrong. DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, however insignificant or polite. SAY "NO COMMENT" to everything.

Most of all, DON'T BE SCARED BY THEM! They know the law, and now so do you. USE IT!

A.Friend.


Missing the point

03.07.2005 10:38

It doesn't matter if they are allowed to do it under S60, they will. Get real this will happen, trying telling some London plod that you "know your rights" and see what happens

Arc


but...

03.07.2005 11:41

Isn't keeping your hands in front of your face to avoid having your photograph taken going to be a bit difficult if they're searching you for weapons?

Crash


Links

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet