Note that Simpson & Marwick took instruction from the Scottish Government via of Levy & McRae, not Angiolini privately.
How can Robert defend himself when he was denied the evidence to do so?
Is this not a breach of trust, abuse of power, abuse of process and abuse of position (e.g. fraud act 2006 and the right to a fair trial)? Why, who gains?
Read full document and article here:
http://holliedemandsjustice.org/content/who-really-issued-the-interdict-on-robert-green/#comment-262