The *** and the newly formed Tenants Action Group put pressure on Community Seven, the new commercial private sector landlord for the Kensington area, to rehouse them at a hastily a meeting attended by nine tenants at the C7 office on Thursday 8th July. After over an hour and half of intensive negotiation chaired by myself an *** and housing activist along with Mike Lane campaigner for social justice in the Kensington area and editor of the Whistleblower news-sheet, members of the McKay family and other tenant supporters, C7 Chief Exec' Tom McGuire (delaying his holiday for a few hours)and Anna Bishop finally relented after constructing numerous obstacles to why they couldn't, shouldn't or wouldn't rehouse the McKay family in the area. These included; "The council is responsible for housing the homeless", "Have you tried the other housing associations in the area", "We're got many more urgent cases", "The McKay family are just the tip of the iceberg", "We are a business". WE pointed out that the council has transferred much of it's remaining housing to the Community Seven landlord thus C7 have most of the former council housing in the area, in regard to the other housing associations we pointed out that through stock swaps C7 is acquiring the stock of other HAs and RSL in the area. We also said the McKay family are what is uppermost in our concerns at this meeting. We further added that we weren't concerned about their business worries or their financial situation, we were concerned that they carried out their duty as a so-called 'social' landlord in the Kensington community.
We had agreed the night beford that we would set out a list of demands, one that the family remain in the area which they wanted to, that they had a house suitable for their housing requirements that C7 were duty bound to rehouse them after making them an offer which they denied was an offer 'more of a proposal' and hastily withdrawing it thus demoraling an already demoralised family. They said "we don't want to set a prescendent" which was what we expected they would say at our meeting the night before, but we said they themselves had already set the prescedence and that the onus was upon them to find them somewhere before their landlord's threatened eviction took place. They were due to be evicted as Rackman-like landlord MGM in the Kensington area wants to make more profits by filling their houses with yet more students rather than a single family. We said we're return the following Wednesday to find out if the house they'd been offered as a 'proposal' was habitable and we'd bring the rest of the iceberg with us if neccesary.
On the following Monday, less than two working days, the family were offered a house, a neighbour informed *** me, that the house was indeed a four bedroom accommodation had been substantially improved and that informal information was passed onto the family the same evening. The next day they viewed the house and were happy to accept it, but couldn't sign up for it until the following Monday. The Tenants Action Group still had it's meeting on the Wednesday 1pm and all of us were informed of the good news by the McKay family in their kitchen and we collectively shouted "We've got a house", I rang the C7 office to inform them that we wouldn't be coming to the office in the afternoon, but due to a computerised telephone queuing system we couldn't get through to speak to anyone that afternoon when it is usually closed anyway.
The family were constantly concerned about whether the offer could be pulled from them at the last moment, though as I said if they pulled it we would move to the next stage of action and take more people into the office, we knew well the McKay family had been let down by Liverpool City Council, most of the councillors, including the leader of the city Mike Storey over the past seven months and also the previous twelve months by the council's non-payment of housing benefit leading them to being evicted from one home in Needham road to their current threatened home in the same road.
On Monday 19th July the McKay family signed for their new home, even though it was like the third degree from the sound of it, ie had to have birth certificates for all family members, bank statements, credit checks, N.I. numbers and other stuff I believe.
On Tuesday: Friends and family helped them move in to it, ie I drove the large removal van and although somewhat stressful and heavy work. What the *** and TAG have achieved is a victory for the working class in general and tenants in particular here in Liverpool. We hope that this example of collective working class action will provide a inspiration to other working class tenants and be a positive ripple as it has been to all the *** and TAG members involved and myself.
The is of course a far bigger story behind this victory, but the question is who will report or print it? The Echo weren't interested in interviewing the family a few months ago, after agreeing to send around their photographer on two occasions and then cancelling.
We think it's shameful that working class families face threats of eviction or even threats of heavies being sent in to make way for the student invasion in Liverpool. The *** and TAG will continue to stand alongside working class people who call for our help and work with and support them to ensure their demands are met.
Due to capitalist establishment/media and anarchist Indymedia censorship, we chose to use *** in place of SLP which is the Socialist Labour Party in our postings, to remind people that we don't get fair or equal access to the media as the mainstream or other pro-capitalist parties get, we can't even get 'negative' reporting or name checks.
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
Oh I say, it ain't cricket old boys!
24.07.2004 08:19
24 July 2004 05:32
From:
CARLREALEY@aol.com
"can you please stop putting party political stuff on indy media you are making it difficult to limit the amount of editing that happens.
thanks
carl"
Right so even when I refer to the *** in my postings the indymedia anarchist establishmentarians ain't happy, what kind of alternative news source is this? Just another bunch of middle class people carving out 'their niche' within the confines of the capitalist system. Bah humbug, I've already stated quite clearly that the story is about a family who the *** helped to rehouse in double quick time, the Echo didn't want to cover the story. We'll just circumvent Indymedia, you can't forever exclude the working class who are politically organised.
Kai, Liverpool ***
Mr doesn't know when enough is enough!
well done ***
24.07.2004 12:44
We need community action, not community splits - Carl, please don't take this the wrong way - but do you know what you're talking about with regards to Politics?
Everything we do is political - standing up for ourselves thats political, standing up for the homeless thats political, organising meetings on behalf of others who have been left dis-empowered by members of the State, thats political.
Unfortunately if Indymedia can't differeniate between these minor (but incredibly important) points, then what good is Indymedia? Another self-serving interest for the middle-class'? I hope not - but its turning out that way.
Who cares about the editing or whatever?
Thats the problem for the mediators to resolve - not to publicly rebuke members of the community who take great pride in their work for the community.
Also can people give any other advice that would be just as effective as what was carried out by the ***? Doubt it very much.
I am not a member of ***, not a member of SWP, SLP or any other political allegiance - just a member of the community,i.e just like you. Plus,I like the readings and writings of Malatesta, Goldman and Bakunin.
clarence carlos
Direc action? bollocks
24.07.2004 20:40
keep your party politricks off indymedia
ben
Thanks for the support...
24.07.2004 20:57
We need to engage in collective action to put anti-social behaviour on the back heel. My own family has been a victim of anti-social behaviour my mum was knocked down by a motorbiking youth in Croxteth riding around at full speed on the pavement in June, she was badly injured while I was away for the weekend, the youth never even stopped. We were also victims of anti-social behaviour in our home when we lived in Norris Green, we were not aided in anyway by Merseyside Police or Liverpool City Council back in 1999. The road we live in Altcross Road is well known for anti-social behaviour, pellets have been shot at windows, including ours, cars damaged, mine has had it's mirror smashed, pelted with stones and rubbish tipped over it, buses have been pelted with stones, bins placed across what is a main road in the early hours of the morning to cause a crash or something.
I'm also aware of residents in Cameron Street in Kensington being persecuted by a newly arrived anti-social neighbour. The *** (not TAG by the way) was sent an anonymous long letter requesting help in part of the Norris Green estate where I was a candidate for the *** in the June 10th election.
During the election one woman asked me for help in how she could end the problem of youths hanging around outside their houses making noise and keeping small children awake, I recommended that residents tackle the youths collectively, ie when one person came out to complain everyone else stands at the door to offer visual and physical support, but also that the complainer reasons with the youth, not swear or abuse them, often youth can be reasoned with if given the chance. But that it cannot be tackled without collective support, otherwise you end up being isolated and targeted ie your car gets stoned or something else. She appreciated that advice and I should take the time to return to that person and get an update on the issue.
Tackling anti-social behaviour requires a strategy involving collective action so as not to isolate or expose any single individual within the group or neighbour in a road to attack.
Kai
Mr doesn't know when enough is enough (-:.
e-mail: aokai@tiscali.co.uk