Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

Cambridge traffic set to worsen - Transport 2000 campaign

Simon Norton - relayed by Manos/Cambridge IMC | 05.10.2003 17:29 | Ecology | Cambridge

On Tue 30 Sept 2003 a public inquiry started into a proposal to dual the A428
which runs westward from Cambridge.

Common sense suggests that this would exacerbate Cambridge's traffic problems --
and the last thing the city needs is more cars coming in from the west or any
other direction. The Highways Agency claim to have figures which show that the
extra traffic using the dualled route would not be "new" but would come off
other routes, but is this really a tenable position -- especially as it didn't
form part of their original statement of case ? (The 1994 report of the Standing
Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment, which has been accepted by the
Government, states that more road capacity does lead to extra traffic,
especially where the existing network is close to capacity, as is the case here
at peak times.)

Transport 2000 Cambs & W Suffolk is pushing for an alternative scheme involving
a combination of bus priorities, better public transport, and park & ride. For
further details (including what you can do) see our website on
 http://www.t2000cam.org.uk/ including the link to Newsletter 84, where the
issue is the subject of the headline article "Death of a City". Note that it
wasn't till after this newsletter was written that we received the Highways
Agency's rebuttal of our objection, in which we first heard their claim that the
dualling wouldn't result in extra traffic.

Or email the Coordinator on  simon@dpmms.cam.ac.uk

Simon Norton, Coordinator, Transport 2000 Cambs & W Suffolk

Simon Norton - relayed by Manos/Cambridge IMC


Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Answers to the local traffic problems

05.10.2003 18:40

[Note this is a comment to an article appearing on the IMC-UK newswire ...apologies in advance to any narrow minded Cambridge people]

It is all the bloody oil's problems.

Every oil country with oil is also 'dead' due to our habits. (Saudi, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Venuzela....)

Do not forget to hit it where it matters. The oil merchants are in a mess right now (however much they spin it to look like its all rosy).

In my humble opinion the more relevant development in Cambridge in news is the concrete proof that we are murdering in cold blood the Iraqi babies and grand mothers as we read this.

 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=450121
"No uranium, no munitions, no missiles, no programmes (JUST BLOOD and OIL!)"

Please connect the issues of traffic/congestion/death of our cities to the much more important dirty trade in fossil fuels and the even more important, dangerously helpless, suffering of the innocent Iraqis at the hands of our thugs.

ram


Narrow minded?

20.01.2004 15:59

For the record - what is the definition of "narrow-minded Cambridge people"? People who may perhaps disagree with you . . .?

Andy Lee


Links