Gordon Bissett, Ladbrokes' Stadia Operations Controller, described this country's animal protection laws as "daft" and ridiculed the necessity to humanely kill a lobster rather than placing it in a pan of boiling water.
Bissett, who is in charge of Ladbrokes two dog tracks at Monmore Green (Wolverhampton) and Crayford, was speaking at a conference of the American Greyhound Track Operators Association in Las Vegas when he made the remarks.
(See www.dogmagazine.net/archives/6298/shocking-views-on-greyhound-welfare-expressed-by-industry-insider for more information)
Tony Peters, UK Co-ordinator for international greyhound protection group Greyhound Action, said he was "disgusted, but not surprised" by Mr Bissett's remarks.
Mr Peters added: "Gordon Bissett is the controller of two tracks that are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of greyhounds every year, so it is hardly surprising that he has a callous attitude to all animals.
"His remarks, and the laughter they caused at this conference, give an insight into the type of people who are involved in running the dog racing industry, which is only too happy to treat greyhounds as disposable commodities.
"They make a pretence to the public of caring about the dogs, but this incident has revealed that they have little or no regard for animal suffering and is even more reason why the public should boycott greyhound racing.
"We estimate that the existence of Ladbrokes' two tracks is responsible for the putting to death of almost 1,000 greyhounds every year, based on recent research which indicates that over 12,000 greyhounds are "put down" annually because of the British dog racing industry.
"Many of these greyhounds are killed while still very young, and even as puppies, after failing to make the grade as racers, and others are put to death when their "careers" on the track come to an end.
"An RSPCA report on greyhound racing has stated that 'at least 20 greyhounds a day - either puppies which do not make the track, or retired dogs aged three or four - simply disappear, presumed killed'.
"In addition, thousands of injuries to greyhounds, many of them serious, occur every year in Britain. The main reason for this is that the shape of the tracks, with fast straights leading into tight bends, creates a very dangerous environment for dogs to run in.
"Members of the public can help put an end to this horrific situation by not attending dog tracks or betting on greyhound racing, so this appalling death-industry fades away through lack of financial support."
Local Greyhound Action supporters hold regular demos outside Monmore Green Stadium as part of a campaign to get the greyhound track there closed down. The photo above, taken at one of their demonstrations can be viewed and downloaded in larger format for printing (right click on picture) at
![](/img/extlink.gif)
For more information, please visit Greyhound Action's website at
![](/img/extlink.gif)
Comments
Hide the following 10 comments
I love to slit an animal's throat whilst it is still conscious
23.09.2010 07:06
How come you're not speaking out about this?
Double standards?
Allahu Akbar infidels and Dhimmis!
Islamonazi
e-mail:
crueltytoanimals@halal.com
Homepage:
http://www.halal.com
Piss off Islamonazi
23.09.2010 07:30
Well done to those who stand outside these greyhound tracks, I'll try and get along to support one day.
Lynn Sawyer
Lynn
23.09.2010 07:54
The Grass
Here we go..
23.09.2010 11:53
Lynn Sawyer
Animal rights
23.09.2010 13:11
Despite your animosity to me, I wish you well and good luck in your campaign.
For I am against halal, not because it is another tool to bash Muslims with, I am genuinely for animal welfare and see it as a retrograde step, when Britain has been making progress in the farming of animals. I just wish Labour had enforced the same rules/standards for imported meat, as it does on our domestic farming, instead of allowing the food industry to import cheaper meat without the welfare standards.
RH (formerly Islamonazi)
Halal issue is a red herring
23.09.2010 14:50
It would be like praising a rapist for using a condom. Rape is wrong, period, just as animal slaughter is wrong, period. The religious slaughter issue is just used by racists trying to hijack animal rights for their own agenda.
vegan
Reply to vegan
23.09.2010 22:41
Yes, I totally understand your post and that you see halal as a mere distraction.
However, much as I'm not as au fait with animal welfare/slaughter as you are, you are not probably as knowledgeable about Islamism as I am.
The trouble is, Islam is a total belief system, not a religion. Whilst you get to promote animal welfare under the secular UK, it will be a world of difference under Sharia. Just look at countries under Islamic rule.
I'm not asking you to like the EDL or try and even understand us, but please do research on animal welfare in Islamic countries and see how much they (animal rights) are allowed to protest.
It is a basic tenet of Islam that they must implement Sharia acrosss the whole world. They have some pretty sick ideas when it comes to animals, which makes our fox hunters look like nice people.
RH
@RH
24.09.2010 07:05
I do have a problem with what you call Islamism, the idea of a world dominated by this one belief system or a couple of whackos ideas of what the belief system actually is Ihave no idea whether this is just talk or a genuine threat . I would like to know more about it. I am vehemently opposed to all imperialism. In fact I have a massive problem with it and agree with you but to say that Halal is more cruel than normal slaughter is missing the point. Every single one of those animals is terrified and suffers pain, some (according to a report from the USA) are skinned alive fully concious because of the speed of the line , they are often not stunned properly. A ban on Halal and indeed Kosher (and I don't think the Jews are planning world dominion) is as vegan says a red herring a waste of our time, a slaughterhouse welfare measure which really makes no difference to those having their throats slashed.
I would say as well that by marginalising ordinary Muslims we are simply putting them in an impossible isolated position where they cannot fight fundamentalism.
Lynn Sawyer
Vegan muslims
24.09.2010 07:44
Also Halal/kosher butchers and abbatoirs have faced the same amount of direct action as non-halal/kosher ones. I can remember a case in huddersfield where a particularly nasty Halal abbatoir was permanently shut down. The AR people who shut it down were taken to court but were found innocent (to have acted in good faith) when the owners admitted all the animal welfare regulations they had broken. Similarlu non-halal abbatoirs have been attacked.
Daily
Reply to RH
24.09.2010 09:38
But trying to single out Islam as being particularly worse for animals than any of the other religions is naïve at best. Mohammed was reportedly a massive cat lover, for example.
I thought the EDL though the sun shines out of Israel's arse? So don't they oppose kosher slaughter, which is essentially the same as halal? Or are you one of the confused EDLers who isn't sure whether to love Jews because you hate Muslims, or hate Jews because antisemitism is the right-wing Way?
vegan