The “carnival” began some people meeting on the grass verge, others walking around the back fields, others refusing to stand where they were told. Fitwatchers (many thanks) blocked cameras and the vast majority of activists refused to be served with what were found out later to be section 14 notices. This meant that officers resorted to chasing people (even passers by) with bits of paper. In addition to playing tag they even stopped the train at the station detaining all passengers to serve the notices prior to people getting off the train according to the Ledbury reporter.
Those on the verge opposite the station reached a consensus that it would be a good idea to turn left towards the labs and a dash was made down the Bromyard road. The police responded (albeit slowly) and blocked the activists, arrested a couple of people and hit others. After a short while a large group ran towards the back fields via the road out of Ledbury. Others decided to go on the police approved march, only the police had changed their minds! They blocked our way into Ledbury and so activists went on to join the others down the road. A footpath was made good use of but unfortunately only 20 activists made it through with 2 evidence gatherers who were pleading for backup. The 20 made it through Ledbury to Sequani Clinical where they do human trials testing shampoo, face creams etc which have been animal tested. A decision was made after a quick demo there to go back and on returning to the Homeend all activists joined up for a big lively demo’ through Ledbury (the police had decided to let us march after all). To the best of our knowledge this is the largest march in Ledbury for a least a decade. On the Ledbury Portal (a local website) a local can be heard saying that they never see a police officer in the town when they are needed. Roads were blocked for most of the day by police.
West Mercia police, government, Netcu and the FIT teams had it clearly demonstrated to them that if they persecute us that we are not afraid to fight back. Indeed, considering that prior to 2006 demonstrations rarely went into double figures the promises made to Sequani by operation Tornado about getting rid of us all have been shattered.
The Hereford Journal reported that to actually police the demo’ West Mercia persuaded Hereford United football team to play on the Friday night instead of Saturday afternoon. This is regrettable for the football fans ordinary folk who may have had their enjoyment of the game curtailed possibly to cause resentment against us. However Hereford united are sponsored by Cargill a really nasty company who kill millions of chickens for McDonalds, force GMOs into the marketplace, destroy rainforests, etc, etc, none of us were too upset for them, they were also visited by activists who had an impromptu picnic outside the abattoir thus disrupting a shift change.
According to the police “the purpose of the assembly is part of an ongoing campaign to intimidate staff working at Sequani with an intention to force closure”. WRONG, the purpose of campaigning against that hell hole is to stop animals being tortured to death, to stop corporations medicalising normal human conditions, to stop pollutants being forced on us, to stop people dying from poorly tested medications for example Zyban, Baycol and because we defend the right of the ordinary person to question the corporations and government. We do not care if Sequani does scientific research on medications and other essential products without torturing and killing as long as they abuse no-one so we do not necessarily want to shut them down. Our aim is to stop their violence against others for a profit, not to intimidate workers. In fact we want to remain approachable so that workers if they so wish to have the means by which to expose cruelty and any illegal practices. If anyone is intimidated by a few banners and leaflets in what is supposedly a democracy then that is pitiful. A bit like one of us saying that we feel “intimidated” by a Countryside Alliance stall in Worcester, or a McDonalds advert and expecting the police to spend 2 % of their entire years budget investigating the complaint!
Thanks to all those who came to Ledbury to show solidarity especially to those who are usually embroiled with other very important campaigns.
We will be having a demonstration at Sequani at Halloween 16.00 onwards for all who want to come. We will do some food this time. Wear costumes, bring your own banners regarding SOCPA if you want to. We will be able to provide some accommodation just ring us. As the next day is November 1st we will be doing something then as well in the area.
Comments
Hide the following 17 comments
Go to the demo.... don't get accomodation!
17.09.2008 23:32
NoGrass
Dear no grass
18.09.2008 09:12
2. I am one of the people offering accomodation, obviously 6 Boat Lane, Evesham has been on thousands of leaflets and posters. I strongly suspect that the police are watching the house and I do get a bit of hate mail, bailiffs and dodgy blokes turning up from corporations with dodgy bits of paper. None of this bothers me though I know many who would never pop in for a cuppa because of all this (which I respect). However, activists often stay here when they are passing through as I have stayed at many other activist homes when I am away. Sometimes I do not know them and they do not know me. Yes there is a small risk that a police officer could turn up, but as we should all assume that our houses and phones are bugged, we should never discuss actions with those not involved and assume that we are under surveillance then I think that it is better to try and help other activists with food, travel, accomodation etc where possible, meet new people and learn from them rather than assume that they are informers/infiltrators.
3. Of course the police want informers and are trying to infiltrate. We should all be careful but one of the reasons they do this is to create a climate of fear and mistrust amongst us. You do not have to trust anyone but if attending demos etc we can all be civil and not help the police by spreading unfounded rumours about other activists.
4. On the other hand... we have noticed that the mice have new toys, the rabbits have posh diamond collars and the dogs have huge bones, we suspect that they might have turned.
Lynn
lynn Sawyer
e-mail: lynn@sawyer8749.freeserve.co.uk
Answer to point number 1
18.09.2008 11:39
This has nothing to do with the arrest/no prosecution of 2 from WARN. This is seperate suspicions. We will be passing on the information to other members of WARN once we have confirmed or disproved the suspicions.
What we are saying is that activists should not be passing any info which could ID them to certain members of WARN. By all means go to the demo, the animals shouldn't suffer because of these rumours but no activist should be giving information which could be used to ID them to WARN at this time.
No other group seems to find it necesary for activists to get in touch with them when they are organising a demo. Why is WARN different?
NoGrass
Response to no grass
18.09.2008 14:27
lynn Sawyer
e-mail: lynn@sawyer8749.freeserve.co.uk
SO BLOODY BORING!
18.09.2008 14:46
We as "WARN" never offer accommodation to anyone or lifts to demos.
This is nothing more than police bullshit trying to cause a rift in our movement by getting us to suspect each other of being grasses. And YES that's what a police informer would tell people.
These no evidence accusations are getting pathetic WARN have tried bloody hard to help animals not to be undermined by tossers on IndyMedia, if you have concerns ring us or if you have proof then post it on here if not stop shit stirring you pathetic idiots.
Chris Dowdeswell
WARN
Chris Dowdeswell
Well said.....
18.09.2008 15:22
I have better things to do than come on here really but it's always good for a laugh when I need a break from winning the fight against animal abuse. You know the old saying; first they laugh......blah blah blah.....
SG
Yawn...
18.09.2008 15:31
The only conspiracy is the inconsistency of posts by 'No Grass'. Firstly they claim that they have heard a lot of rumours (e.g. reading their own probably) therefore do not trust them because blah blah blah WILL happen. If you heard a rumour, how do you know its true?
I hear rumours everyday, you can even buy them weekly from celebrity gossip magazines, but without any evidence apart from your own posts; you're making a joke out of yourself!
Anyone with more than 5 brain cells can work this one out.
bored
NoGrass
18.09.2008 17:25
I really do think therefore that you are a pro-viv from a pro viv group or a police officer (same thing). If you have any respect for animals and the fight towards their liberation, I don't think you should come on here and post these sorts of things anymore.
If you are a genuine AR person (unlikely in my opinion), you should go get this so called evidence and until then, stay quiet. Honestly, you're fighting a losing battle cos we will not be disrupted.
SG
They grased up to the BBC
18.09.2008 21:32
NoGrass
.....
19.09.2008 03:00
It's a bit like talking to the public when they can't win the vivisection argument with us and then start banging on about "terrorism".
WARN, I can only think you are being really effective in your campaigning and the opposition have it in for your group. I really wouldn't waste your time coming on here and defending yourselves as we all know and understand what real AR campaigners are all about and it aint this hilarity.
))
SG
You mean the "santuary" that was exposed for animal cruelty?
19.09.2008 07:58
If grassing up these days is telling the media that animals have no food or water, were living in dirty conditions, if they survived it, and clearly neglected, then that's exactly what WARN did, and would do again I imagine. The RSPCA even served warnings on the makeshift animal "sanctuary", later removing animals that the owner clearly could not cope with (or shouldn't of had where he did; they weren't too keen to tell). Not sure how that’s grassing up an individual though, only exposing animal cruelty, therefore giving animals a better chance.
I think it may be more obvious who this might be now; the argument has resorted to this before.
militant
To Lynn Sawyer
19.09.2008 08:33
Ray Market
e-mail: r_market_and_t_janes@gmail.com
Militant -stop covering up
19.09.2008 09:52
Putting up a video of a completely different sanctuary shows how desperate Warn are to try to hide their actions.
NoGrass
Link to the back story
19.09.2008 10:03
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/southcoast/2008/05/398152.html?c=all
NoGrass
What are you on about (yet again!!)?
19.09.2008 10:37
As for the santuary, it speaks for itself as the financial fraud was leaked.
From BBC Inside Out: Animal sanctuary investigation http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/content/articles/2008/04/30/west_pet_sanctuary_s13_w10_feature.shtml
"...conditions at the sanctuary itself that are questionable at best"
"Customers are led to believe the money – about £400 to £600 a week - goes straight to the charity. In fact, none of it is ever declared in the charity's accounts."
"The charity received more than £30,000 but none of the money was declared in the charity's accounts to the Charity Commission."
Warn openly campaigned against the santuary, speaking to the media and likewise (as you linked) posted on indymedia about it. The owners were clearly taking the money selflessly for themselves, probably as a retirement fund or something. I don't think its too hard to grasp the concept of people keeping a few pets, calling them re-homed, although not looking for homes, then asking for money by pretending to be a charity. Its basic fraud.
militant
The BBC
19.09.2008 21:52
This is a really odd situation, I don't know who to believe in it to be honest. I can't believe any genuine animal rights network would involve the BBC in anything, their links to the police/special branch are well known. I don't understand why anyone would contact the BBC against an animal sanctuary, local papers possibly but the BBC never.
I do know one thing though, never trust the BBC.
Bex x
Bex
What about the RSPCA taking animals?
22.09.2008 12:29
For the RSPCA to have actually taken animals (even though they usually don't give a shit about animals) means the place must have been bad.
It is obvious that you cannot trust the BBC, I agree but they don't generally put their arses on the line and send in undercover journalists to investigate without good cause.
If not for WARN people would have continued to take animals to these people and made donations which would have lined their pockets even more.
Even if this sanctuary was so called "animal rights" which sounds like bullshit, does that mean we should let animals suffer to protect our own. If an AR activist was molesting children would we protect them? NO the fact is if you cannot run a sanctuary you do not deserve to run a sanctuary!
Mighty Woooosh