The opposite end of the argument is that of the Asians who, over time, feel that they are not going to be harassed any longer by their neighbours. After many years of being passive and peaceful, the Asians now rule the roost in terms of drugs and their own gangs. But some of them, especially Muslims, also feel marginalised. The backdrop to this situation is also the current ‘War on Terror’ in which the Muslims, who are from all ethnic denominations, are being victimised and vilified by mainstream society and their own neighbours. The youth exist in a vacuum torn between the harsh reality on the street peddling what they can, or entering into a community system which has an enclosed hierarchy. This has lead to a massive feeling of resentment and loss of identity which is now having repercussions through all communities.
There are criminal elements that exist within all communities, many of which have been under suspicion before the recent riots. The shooting of a known drug-dealer on Lozells Road, the killing of two innocent young women at a party by a gang in Aston are just a few of the incidents that have scarred the community’s soul. These crimes have fragmented a community bit by bit to the stage that they are at each others throats, none more recently than the senseless murder of Isaiah Young-Sam.
There are real attempts being made for resolve and a concerted effort to begin to influence both communities for calm. Youth workers and community activists are trying to convene a unity committee and make links with like minded individuals on the ground. Unfortunately, there are also many efforts being made to make sure that the argument and furore carries on. In my opinion this is to encourage maximising reputation, funding and superiority over one another, racism.
Comments
Hide the following comment
How widely may Franz Fanon be applied?
25.01.2006 00:15
There are a number of problems with this kind of overly psychological anaylsis. It necessarliy loses sight of more objective factors. It also purports to be universally true and yet it is obviously not (example follows). If it is not universally true then when and how is it true? Rather than being an axiom of the politics of oppression it is merely an observation about how some individuals might react if they were intensely subjugated and abused. (I should add that nobody in the UK at the moment IS intensely subjugated and abused, oppression takes more subtle forms).
Example
--------------
This is from the town of Poso in Indonesia and dates from October 2005. Three Christian schoolgirls were abucted on their way to school by Muslim fundamentalists and were beheaded. This was one of a series of appalling attacks on the Christian community in Thailand by violent Muslim oppressors. This has been going on for years. The Christians in Thailand are treated like second class citizens. Despite Fanon's prediction they have not started to kill one another.
Fanon's idea is helpful in so few situations as to make it useless.
DavidN