On January 19th this year,during the bombardment of Gaza six people entered the EDO/ITT arms factory in Moulescoombe and caused extensive damage. On May 4th thousands took to the streets for a mass demonstration.
HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us
Smashy | 29.06.2009 14:26 | Smash EDO | Anti-militarism | Iraq | Palestine | South Coast
Smashy
e-mail:
smashedo@riseup.net
Homepage:
http://www.smashedo.org.uk
30.06.2009 18:55
smashy
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza
2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival
Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007
April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006
Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003
SchNEWS
PorkBolter
Rough Music
Cowley Club
Smash EDO
Brighton-Tubas Friendship and Solidarity Group
Brighton activist
Portsmouth No2ID
Greenpeace Hampshire
Camp Titnore
Protect Our Woodland!
Stop Cissbury Sell-Off!
Southern Animal Rights Coalition
Violence Free Science
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 10 comments
One step back
29.06.2009 16:34
This talk could equally be accompanied with a critique of law and government. The liberal manner in which the question is presented justifies the governments that go to war and allow arms trading in the first place.
@non
Smashy has proved themselves in anti-combat
29.06.2009 22:48
Danny
@non
29.06.2009 23:43
It's pretty obvious that Smash EDO and many other groups have no little doubt about direct action and decommissioning... and give the "liberal" shit a rest eh.
Ray Milandmine
Can't see the point
30.06.2009 02:47
Stroppyoldgit
erm
30.06.2009 04:21
All of this has been done, including the making of movies.
" A meeting on a summer evening in a gloomy hall on the sweltering Euston Road isn't going to attract anyone but a handful of activists opposed by a few ultra liberal, pointy-head idealogues. This isn't where, how or with whom to have the debate that matters."
There isn't going to be a debate on the Euston Road - thats why it says Ship Street, cos its a local debate in Brighton and I'm sure that its designed to counter the police claims spread by the Argus, as well as to encourage those who support the campaign, but have misgivings about the methods to get more information on the thinking behind the actions.
mate of the smashnics
@ Ray Milandmine
30.06.2009 11:26
I wasn't trying to be quite a scathing as I think you are making out. I was just noticing that it seemed to be a shift.
The idea of a talk like this being about consensus is absurd. There is no possible way to have consensus on an issue like this that is why we have diversity of tactics and autonomous action.
I can understand the need to engage the public but it's the way the question is phrased not the meeting its self that I take issue with.
@non
@non
30.06.2009 11:48
So, yeah something of a PR exercise. It is indeed debatable whether it will achieve anything an any results will be immeasurable, but it certainly won't help publicly decrying the attempt to engender some dialogue with the fellow Brightonians and get themselves across without the shitstirring shitrag the Argus getting in the way, or the police scaremongering, or ITT/EDO sneaking around talking crap posing as ordinary punters.
So, I'd ask if if your cynicism is really worth the succour to those who may wish to derail Smash EDO? In other words, some people may not see the point or like the format, but unless you have positive input perhaps it is best to gracefully stay out the debate.
Engaging the public/locals has a chequered past, but it can often work- look at the recent Heathrow stuff and many road building campaigns.
Doing nothing of course has a gloriously consistent past, unfortunately the reliable results are purely negative and gives shitstirring shitrags like the Argus all the vacuum they need.
Ray Milandmine
@ Ray Milandmine
30.06.2009 12:59
Its not a case of 'if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all'. The reason I felt the need to say anything at all was because I wish to see the campaign win!
To elaborate on my original point.
What if the majority of people at the debate where against breaking the law? Would the SmashEDO campaign continue with diversity of tactics or indulge local opinion (or to be more honest, the opinion of those who care to turn up which which I would suggest in its self probably doesn't represent a key demographic though I may be wrong)
So trying to be constructive maybe the question I would pose would be 'How do we fight the War Machine?'. In this case if the mood on the night allows debate to develop then it would be very easy to move past questions like 'Is breaking the law to prevent war crimes justified?' which are likely to end in arguments based on ideological divides (predictably between liberals and anti-authoritarian types) and onto taking effective action.
@non
Okay I'm running out of ends of stick get the wrong end of now.
30.06.2009 13:41
Yeah, given the general level of apathy there is a real danger the event could be hijacked by people with an agenda, or just dominated reactionaries. Again, this will always be a danger, and again there is no real way of avoiding this other than not holding an event... which again plays into the hands of the local shitstirrers.
How much of this will be a meet & greet and how much will be a 'consultation' with an agenda is unknown to me- having nothing to do with them- but again the only other option is silence and the manipulation of the local press.
It's quite obvious that there is no public mandate for or against Smash EDO or EDO itself. It's the nature of activism: logically only the issues that don't get addressed, become activist issues. The reasons for the lack of public engagement in such issues is broad and varied, but two factors are at play here:1.) the usual fact that most people are too busy holding down a shit job and bringing up a family to have time to notice issues 2.) Most of the media exposure to activism is routinely negative (as the agenda of the media is at odds with people who value human life & dignity over profit or careerism).
So, again, there is more to lose not engaging the public. But there is no real local opinion to follow- as with most activist issues.
You could also be overlooking- at the risk of sounding like Tony Blair- a potential third way. That the divergent camps of anti-authoritarian & other camps could actually agree to work in tandem... I can but dream hahaha!
Personally, I see nothing wrong if people want to be active but not want to be arrested and yes I think your framing of the issue is possibly more constructive/progressive.
If I were local I'd definitely see more sense in going along and contributing, and I think your reservations/suggestions would make you a good addition to the debate yourself.
And of course Smash EDO isn't hierarchical and you can always independently take whatever action.
Ray Milandmine
to sum up the current debate
30.06.2009 17:33
I propose we now have a further meta-debate about whether or not this comment is valid in the overall debate about the debate or is just some flippant remark that adds nothing
if you consent please put your fingers in the air and make theatrical consensus hand signals and remember to smile nicely.
Thankyou
facilitator