HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

SouthCoast Indymedia

Oil prospecting in Sussex and Hampshire

Kate | 08.05.2008 13:17 | Ecology | Social Struggles | South Coast

The prospects of $200 a barrel oil in the near future is making oil prospecting in Sussex and Hampshire look ever more likely. Residents nearby the proposed Northern petroleum sites at Hedge End, Hampshire and Forestside, West Sussex are anxiously awaiting the decisions of council planning officers. The sites are believed to contain several hundred million barrels of oil.

Both projects have been proposed by Northern Petroleum, which is listed on the AIM market and is the favourite of various hedge funds. Apparently, Hedge End was put forward as a potential drilling site in 1988, but according to the firm environmental opposition prevented it from going ahead. Below are 2 pieces on the projects from MEP and local rag.

Chris Huhne Says County Decision on Hedge End Oil Drilling is Flawed

Hampshire MEP Chris Huhne today protested at the way Hampshire County council proposes to take the decision on whether to drill for oil in Hedge End.
In a letter to Cllr Ken Thornber, the Conservative leader of the county, Mr Huhne says that the process of deciding is flawed because the county is "judge and jury in its own cause".
Mr Huhne, who is also the Liberal Democrat prospective parliamentary candidate, said that it was against the rules of natural justice that local authorities should be able to determine planning applications in their own favour as they have a clear conflict of interest.
"Hampshire County Council owns the land at Hedge End where the proposed oil drilling will take place, and is also the planning authority that will decide whether to drill. That is a clear conflict of interest that means that it cannot decide impartially on behalf of local residents" said Mr Huhne.
"This is a wholly inappropriate site for a noisy and disruptive industrial activity since it is close to two residential areas and the Berrywood primary school. In addition, it is likely to have an adverse impact on the very pleasant brook that runs through the field and which is a valued local amenity" said Mr Huhne.
"The key grounds for objection is simply that an industrial site should not be approved so close to residential areas if zoning is to make any sense at all" said Mr Huhne.
Mr Huhne has asked Mr Thornber whether alternative sites to access the potential oil deposits have been considered, given that the drilling takes place at an angle to the potential deposits and there are therefore many potential alternative sites that could be used. He particularly asks the county to consider alternatives that they do not themselves own.

 http://eastleighlibdems.org.uk/news/000161/stop_hedge_end_oil_plans_says_mep.html

Hunt for oil on the Downs

An oil company plans to drill for black gold under the South Downs.

Ancient woodland in the small village of Forestside, to the west of Chichester, could become the latest outpost in the hunt for oil if planners give an exploratory scheme the go-ahead.

On Tuesday, West Sussex County Council's planning committee meets to decide on an application for the project from drilling company Northern Petroleum.

The firm wants to clear a hectare of Markwell's Wood at South Holt Farm and use a 36m drill 24 hours a day to delve for a share of the estimated 200 million barrels of oil it believes is buried deep in the ground.

With the price of oil having soared to more than £60 a barrel, the site potentially contains fuel worth at least £12 billion.

But as well as being earmarked as National Park land, the woods are in a designated area of outstanding natural beauty. That, coupled with the site's proximity to homes, has prompted a stream of objections from Chichester District Council, the South Downs Joint Committee, West Sussex County Council and the Woodland Trust as well as people living nearby.

Concerns centre on the impact of noise and truck movements in the protected area as well as the visual damage caused by the work and the loss of ancient woodland.

Despite several calls from The Argus, the company yesterday refused to discuss its plans for the site.

Northern Petroleum is confident there is a deep reserve of oil across the north of the county and that the potential for striking a rich seam in this rural corner of Sussex is high.

Oil is already being drawn in nearby Singleton from a pumping station which began operating in 1991 and filled 29,537 barrels last year alone.

Another in Storrington, which began pumping oil in 1999, produced 9,511 barrels last year. Just across the Hampshire border in Horndean, a site which began operating in 1988, produced more than 10,000 barrels last year.

In their report to the committee, the council's officers recommend that the plans are approved.

They state that there is "a clear and overriding need for oil exploration"

in order to promote competitive markets and maintain the reliability of energy supplies.

Access to the site would be gained from the northern side of Forestside Road through an existing farm entrance. The road would then pass behind several homes in Forestside on its route to the site.

One person whose house backs on to the proposed site and access road is Sharon Ordish, who has lived in the village for 14 years.

She said: "It may seem selfish but I don't want to see trucks trundling down the lane behind my house. It's so peaceful and beautiful here.

"I don't see why they need to find some more oil. It's a waste of time. They should be spending money on renewable energy instead."

The effect of the clearing and drilling operation on the abundant wildlife in the area has also been called into question.

In a letter to the county council John Simons, of nearby Dean Lane End, listed a number of species which he said would be affected by the proposals, including buzzards, badgers, foxes, hares, stoats, weasels and a variety of songbirds.

He said: "The area is particularly beautiful and it must be protected and preserved for the future.

"This development will ruin the area and the tower will stick above the trees. The noise from the site and increased traffic will affect people who live in the area.

"If oil is found in sufficient volume and quality to commercially justify its extraction, then what will be the effect of that?

"As a countryman the whole proposal makes me shudder.

"It is alien to this environment and must be rejected by the council."

If planning permission is granted Northern Petroleum would have three years on the site to clear it, cover it in a 30cm layer of stone, set up its 36m tall drilling rig, search for oil and return the land to its previous state.

It maintains that the site would be busy for only about 19 weeks of that time and if oil is found, a separate planning application for future works would have to be gained.

Kate

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

South Coast [navigation.actions2016]

South Coast [navigation.actions2015]

South Coast [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

South Coast Actions 2013

G8 2013

South Coast Actions 2012

Workfare

South Coast Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

South Coast Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

South Coast Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

South Coast Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

South Coast Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

South Coast Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

South Coast Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

South Coast Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

South Coast Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech