*Borders and beyond: barriers to migration, their abolition and the role of researchers*
Presentations:
*Internal immigration controls in the United Kingdom
Konrad Miciukiewicz, Newcastle University
Natalia Paszkiewicz, University of Brighton
*The politics of knowledge: an examination of the use of country information in the asylum determination process.
Natasha Tsangarides, Immigration Advisory Service
*A line in the sand
A film by Bryce Goodman
*Migration, control and fascism
Rhetta Moran, Independent Researcher
*Stratification by stealth: class conflict, class compromise, and migration control
Luke Roelofs, University of Oxford
*Migration control and capitalism: theoretical links and political implications
Fabian Georgi, Free University of Berlin
*Borders as constructions: manipulating natural boundaries in medieval narrative
Emily A. Winkler, University of Oxford
*The economic case for open borders: free movement of people in an era of globalization
Joshua Seidman-Zager and Ramanujan Nadadur, University of Oxford
*Group discussion:
‘Barriers to migration studies’: beyond policy relevance
Conference details:
Saturday, 13 June
11am – 6pm
Lecture Hall, 64 Banbury Road
Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology
University of Oxford
*Please contact
![](/img/maillink.gif)
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Neo liberalism causes migration
11.06.2009 09:50
Neo liberalism causes migration
And people wonder
11.06.2009 11:10
Stop the bnp
to the last 2 posters
12.06.2009 09:54
I'll be attending a similar conference to see what the answer is. Apparently there is a strong, class based argument for abolishing controls - not out of a self sacrificing liberalism.
If you are genuinely asking, attend the event or write to the organisers with your criticisms. I'd like to see what they say.
Ellen S
no they are genuine posts
13.06.2009 10:48
i honestly think most people involved in migration issues are taking a moral stand not a political stand and have failed to think through or analyse why migration is such a core part of neo liberalism .. nothing in this conference meeting seems to in any look to comprehend the function of migration in neo liberalism, which is clearly to provide cheap labour.
that said yes migration is a fact of life under neo liberalism, and we must do all we can to stop people blaming migrants themselves for their passive role in the process, just as we do not blame sweat shop workers for their role in sweat shops.
i theoretically support the concept of no national borders, and oppose migration controls, but we need to supplement this by a clear message to ordinary people that we support their right to control where they live, over housing allocation and work allocation, as much as we support the rights of individuals to migrate. these, two contradictory positions, community and individual rights, will need to be resolved amongst ourselves.
the concept of no borders to labour is key to neo liberalism and where neo liberalism is dominant we see cheap labour at it's worst, e.g in the US where there are millions of illegal migrants, and the UK. Borders and immigration controls are simply not relevant to capitalism wishing a flow of migrants. They do however play a role in disciplining all of us as the recent raids at SOAS illustrate.
hope this makes sense
durruti
Silly demand
13.06.2009 14:53
In fact I think the embalmed corpse of Mao Zedong would get more votes.
Observer
If voting changed anything
13.06.2009 18:33
But loads would vote FOR the death penalty. Should we then accept closed borders and the death penalty? - or perhaps the answer doesn't lie in elections at all.
Perhaps anarchism isn't about elections.
Until all are free
While we fight over space, who owns the world?
15.06.2009 09:46
I am absoultely not a supporter of the BNP, but I do recognise that there is a serious immigration issue here in the UK; ie: that we are at the limit of population numbers now in the UK. However, since the "push" factors of migration due to neoliberalism mentioned by others above are likely to continue into the future, irrespective of the "pull' factors of the economic benefits of getting work over here, then we can safely assume that the issue will remain, as it has done for many years, one of controlled borders and quotas and possibly a more robust points system and right to asylum becoming even more difficult to attain with stricter border policing.
What is the alternative? Well, how about this? The Queen owns loads of land across the planet. How about if reaccomodating failed asylum seekers in land overseas so that they are not forced back to the country they have fled from? (after-all, think you'll find the historic root of the problem of 'third world' underdevelopment can be traced back to the execution of imperial power in past generations!) All asylum seekers should be given all their rights for stay as soon as they make their application for asylum and given a free phone number for access to independent legal advice (well, that's not gonna happen, is it!)
Back to reality of course, it is concerning that prince Andrew has been touring the world speaking on behalf of SERCO to encourage investors to invest in their business. SERCO, the future providers of internment camps across the world! If that is the intepretation of reaccomodation, then that would be a particualrly nasty prospect and not one which I was advocating at-all.
Crown Estates