HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Oxford Indymedia

Democracy or Corpocracy?

the speaker | 09.03.2007 21:40 | Analysis | Animal Liberation | Repression | Oxford

Putting protesters sentences into perspective....

Democracy or Corpocracy?


When demonstrations and protests were at their most potent in the sixties and post-sixties decades in the last century, people believed that their voice had power – that if enough joined the rallying cry for a given political cause, change would come as a direct outcome of their opposition or civil disobedience. In oppressive regimes, those that chose the path of civil disobedience often paid a high price. They did so, knowing that there was a punitive risk factored into any action they took. Yet they did so all the same, and inspired others to swell their ranks; to push their vision and to continue exerting pressure to force change.

In the post-war era, the flower-power baby boom generation - reacting against the fall-out of the Second World War, of Vietnam, of nuclear proliferation, etc, used protest as power. The peace/anti-nuclear movement, green movement and feminist movement arose as a consequence of this burgeoning desire for change. Yet while they were empowered, and their influence filtered gradually into society, little changed fundamentally on the global playing field. Governments continued to hustle for positioning on the global chessboard, conflicts continued to be ‘resolved’ by conflict, and at its height, the Cold War generated so much paranoia that the world was often teetering on the edge of destruction. When the Cold War ended, many hoped that a new era would dawn in which the freedom of speech, which we were said to enjoy in the west, would become less a privilege, and more a facilitator for global co-operation.

Instead, the paranoia that had once been the domain of the Cold War era began to infest the political landscape in the largely stable US and UK economies, whose power centres are the multinational corporations that wield a powerful influence on global economy. Striking out at the religious fervour of the Islamist, the growth of a similarly fundamentalist approach has been seen to creep in to the usually phlegmatic UK, led by a man so under the thrall of his mentor Bush, and so vilified by many in his country for the poor choices he has made that he has become increasingly isolated politically. Blair – the man who promised his nation that he would fix everything - has simply declared war on the individual, promising us nothing more than a nanny state in which we are to be diapered so that we cannot soil his pristine vision.

His vision has not only exacerbated an already volatile theologically-based conflict; it has led us closer and closer to a state which would have once been considered the domain of countries behind the iron curtain. Characterised by excessive policing, criminalisation of protest, repression of free speech, farcical judicial reviews and hundreds of new laws designed to flagrantly denounce the principles of democratic thinking for which this country was once looked to, the UK is becoming increasingly Orwellian in its vision.

Those who have in the past opposed the system using occupation as protest (a time-honoured traditional approach of activists across the political spectrum from environmentalists, peace activists to human rights campaigners) have done so with alacrity, yet the 7th March, 2007 sentencing of three animal rights campaigners to a total exceeding 7 years in prison has highlighted the alarming trend for severe sentencing of animal rights campaigners, the severity of which is unequal to the offence committed. In this case, those sentenced had been demonstrating against companies associated with Huntingdon Life Sciences and had staged a noisy office occupation. There was no violence or criminal damage. It appears the tactics of heavy policing and heavy sentencing of animal rights activists are being used exclusively against this particular movement, which opposes corporate crime involving the killing of millions of animals per annum in pointless experiments.

So far, so astonishing. Even more astonishing is that the perpetrators of many violent crimes, which go unreported by the media, receive derisory sentences by comparison to the likes of Mark and Suzanne Taylor and Teresa Portwine, the activists convicted to a total of more than 7 years for their part in a noisy demonstration; sentences that in no way reflect the severity of their crimes. Deliberate bodily harm, arson, drug trafficking, rape, murder, manslaughter – many of those who commit these crimes get sentenced for 2 – 3 years. Here are some recent examples:

A 16-year-old who knifed and killed a schoolboy was given a 3-year jail sentence [1].

A 22-year-old man who killed a pensioner who challenged him for urinating in the street was given a 2-year sentence [2].

Several men who have murdered their wives have walked free with suspended sentences after the judges have essentially said the defendant’s wives would have tried the patience of a saint [3].

It is vital that the actions of people like Taylor and his co-defendants are put into context. Regardless of where one’s sympathies lie on the issue of animal rights, viewed from a broader perspective, the sentences meted out were hugely disproportionate to the act committed. Because animal rights campaigners challenge the system, and their protests – both those of a legal and illegal nature – target the corporations that wield so much power, they are considered to be a threat to the status quo. Perversely, those who commit violent crimes against the individual are not a threat to the status quo! This excessive sentencing is an insult to anyone who believes in democracy, and marks the continuing rise of an alarming trend in the draconian measures being used to stifle free speech in this country.

At SPEAK Political as part of our remit we will be fighting for the rights of people to speak out against something they object to and for the individuals right to protest. At SPEAK Political we believe in the rights of the individual not the rights of big business to make as much money as they can regardless of the cost to the earth and all those individuals that inhabit this earth, be they human or non human animals.

For more information about SPEAK Political go to:  http://www.speakpolitical.org/

______________________________________________________


End Notes:

[1]  http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/display.var.1216524.0.gavin_browns_teenage_killer_jailed_for_three_years.php

[2]  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/6423103.stm

[3]  http://www.jfw.org.uk/ontrial.htm

the speaker

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. one of princess Annes aides — its simple
Publish your news
-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Oxford Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech