In the last five months I have started 62 projects including bridges, libraries, water sources, poultry breeding and human rights courses. This took a lot of lying to our donor, USAID. The director of Women's Affairs is fully involved in this project means in reality the greedy cow has no interest at all except what she can get out of it, The department of Rural Development will actively monitor this project means they have no money and are begging us for payment to be involved. The contractor has interacted with the community means he has pissed off local men who are threatening to blow him up. A local commander is interested in the project means he has threatened to pull up the water pipes unless he is paid. Next I am introducing solar lamps to Afghanistan and supplying books and equipment for the setting up of provincial libraries. Change is not going to come fast here and perhaps it is better if it does not. Most sustainable change seems to be evolutionary with the assistance of activists pushing it along and waiting for the rest to catch up.
The political campaigns have been almost non existent. The presidential candidates messages have been mostly vote for me because I am of the same ethnic group as you. There have only been a few rallies and quite a lot of posters. Some candidates admit they have no idea how to campaign and those that do risk their lives.
I am likely to be in lock down (confined to my house) for the next couple of days. After this the speculation will probably be over. My ducks do not seem to care.
As I sit typing this at 14.20 local time on Thursday 7th October there is a bomb scare 100 metres up the road.
Comments
Hide the following 2 comments
The US plan for the elections
07.10.2004 13:12
richarddirecttv
Yes Richard
07.10.2004 15:06
Of course Bush has stacked the odds as much as possible in Khazai's favour. The biggest donar here is USAID and they want as much visibility as possible for the present government and their man. Afghans realize this but most still seem to feel he is the best bet for stability and continuing US aid money. They seem to see him as an interim necessity. they are not looking for democracy, where ever that is, but just stability at the moment.
IOM's donor is USAID. I try to maximise the money going out through projects and minimise US visibility. USAID thinks that all these people are grateful to US and Afghan govenment. Those that do know, which is few, just want water or an income and i do not think they are nieve enough to become pro American because of it. The American ambassador has more power here than ministers.
What does trenchant mean??!!
Paul