The law of falling bodies it is wrong: 3 video to show it.

Law of the falling bodies:
Each body increases its speed at the same rate. Not matter its weight.

THE MOVIES ARE (posted on my storage site) 42 SECONDS, SO MAEBY IT WILL TAKE A LITTLE TO UPLOAD. BE PATIENT.

(1 video two equal moneybox the darker it is hotter and faster)
 http://download.xdrive.com/s/613358404O7QF0r4PX3YkjSfjkUU&partner=plus

(2video: two 1 kg weights. Shot down/up)
 http://download.xdrive.com/s/3503269035HZh1INxyZlhYkavtO5&partner=plus

(3 video: two-clay moneybox. The darker it is hotter and fasterShot up/down)
 http://download.xdrive.com/s/350326969wFGFHjW4Cyd8qsNuj9U&partner=plus

The ironic fact is that I'm a student in Vedanta philosophy, which in order of better articulate its concepts tree years ago started also to study physic.
I'm working at the Vedic concept of magnetic field and a month ago a started to check for the falling body under different thermal condition and I soon realized that nobody has ever tried it.

I'll make it clearer:
IN MORE THEN 350 YEARS NOBODY IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMUNITY HAS EVER TRIED THE FALLING BODY EXPERIMENT WITH ONE OF THEM HAVING DIFFERENT THERMAL CONDITIONS.
(Just control it yourself on any search engine, it takes few minutes to get it:
 http://www.google.com
 http://www.yahoo.com
 http://www.msn.com
look for any kind of INFORMATION related to the falling body EXPERIMENTS OR MATHEMATICAL DATA, with one of the bodies hotter. Do not exists)


So I have tried it myself. The first time you see it working differently it is very touching because you just realize that motion it is different then described. It just reacts differently from the beginning. (you’ll see the video, the two moneybox, the hottest it has just not GRIP)

The above has been a big surprise but not the biggest. That comes with the gaseous elements:

ANY TWO GASEOUS BODY (BALOONS OF IT) SAME ELEMENT DIFFERENT SIZE, THE BIGGEST MASS HAS A FASTER ACCELERATION.

According to the gravitational law that shouldn’t happen.
The above it is just an opposite reaction, because the biggest mass should be attracted more and consequently be slower. Or at list both bodies should have the same acceleration as stated by the law of falling body. But that doesn't happen.

The only possible explanation is that the order of motion in the MACROCOSM it is not attracting but repelling.

Mostly it is opposite.

I know that it is not easy to get it, PEOPLE WENT ON THE ''MOON'' AND LATELY ON ''MARS'' WITH THE GRAVITATIONAL LAW, and I do not have any answer for it.
When thing gets too strange here we use direct knowledge in these situations. We just do it again.

Bring two solid bodies same size and element warm one of them up till it gets very hot, then drop them from the roof of a building (at list 5 floors to enjoy the view), and you will see that motion it is different then described on physic books.

After that it will be really easy just to take your partner out to any amusement park and just buy two balloons of different size, drop them and observe the OPPOSITE REACTION which makes the motion to be REPELLING.

THINK ALSO THAT THE ABOVE BRINGS IN FEW CONCLUSIONS:

a ) The law of falling body must be redefined. So gravitational law,
b ) Galileo observed that bodies moving under the only influence of a gravitational field acquire an acceleration that does not depend upon the material or the physical state of the body. Einstein "realized" that this property of gravitational fields implied equivalence between gravity and accelerating frame of reference.
"" This equivalence became the base"" for the famous General theory of relativity.

Mostly physic must be observed again with calm. It is not easy to get how reality really works.

What it is very mysterious for me is the fact that by constantly experimenting how a body falls (or accelerates in a free fall) you automatically know if the EARTH magnetic or "gravitational " field has modified its state. VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE PLANET, and very cheap to make it operative, but it has never been done.

Mostly seems that motions on our planet it is influenced by temperature.
Maybe because the SUN it is just 99.8% mass of the Solar system and as mass it is a THERMAL MASS.

On my site,
 http://vayu61.tripod
It is also explained why Galilei proved ARISTOTELE wrongly wrong (motion & field page left side).
Mine it is a >right not reserved< site. You may use what you like the way you like.

Best regards
Vayu