HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us
Terri Dactal | 24.05.2004 12:04 | Free Spaces | Oxford
Terri Dactal
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Action Resources
- Oxford Action Resource Centre
- Oxford Activism announcement list
Abortion Rights
- Pro Choice Oxford
Alternative Media
- New Internationalist
- Undercurrents
- Vision On TV
Animal Rights
- Speak Campaigns
Community Action
- Braziers Park
- Cyclox
- Oxford Freecycle
Creative Resistance
- Breach of the Peace radical samba band
- Sea Green Singers
Environment
- Goldenfuels
- Grassroots Action on Food and Farming
- Thames Valley Climate Action
- Oxford Conservation Volunteers
Legal Advice
- Activists' Legal Project
- FreeB.E.A.G.L.E.S.
Peace Groups
- Network of Oxford Women for Peace and Justice
- Take Action Email List
Refugee Support/No Borders
- Campaign to Close Campsfield
- Oxford No Borders
- Student Action for Refugees
Research Groups
- Corporate Watch
- ETC Group
- Oxford Research Group
Social Justice
- Oxford Development Abroad
- Oxford Students Fairtrade Coalition
- Oxford Uni People and Planet
- Oxford World Development Movement Group
Solidarity Campaigns
- Oxford Burma Solidarity list
- Oxford Palestine Solidarity Campaign
Suggest a link
More Links > >
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
time
24.05.2004 18:34
PS
Just overheard the building owner in St Clements
25.05.2004 13:40
bettysnake
St Clement was a Top Pope
01.06.2004 23:54
Sadie
The point is...
02.06.2004 09:41
The point is surely that a new expensive housing development (which I assume is what the owner wishes to put there, in order to make maximum profit for herself out of it? Correct me if I'm wrong) is pretty much a 'dead' development - it's not a new, DIY, exciting community space with the potential to be used by hundreds of locals, but just another expensive property whose price will rise and rise - just another closed front door where an open one could have been. We have enough new 'quality' development happening in Oxford unaccompanied by adequate provision of shared community space to worry when we lose the chance of grabbing something like OCSET. The ethos that this kind of thinking is more right than the entrepeneurial wishes of a private owner challenges the whole capitalist mindset - and that might be a bigger point to get one's head around!!
Plus - St Clements may have been swanky several years ago, but it isn't now (though receiving some swankification recently in the addition of some nice new eateries) - for one thing, its heavy traffic load means that no building on it can stay looking good for long. The increased visitors to the strip thanks to OCSET would be good for local businesses (the Post Office & small newsagents, for example) - and add more cheery colour to an often cramped and polluted street. Oxford is crying out for something like OCSET - why do we have to try and crush it because we don't think it looks right?
the Poo
¾d worth of veg
02.06.2004 11:32
The future of this property will be decided by the planning department of the democratically elected council (which includes Green members) and by the actual owner of the property. Anyone who seriously believes that the Council should requisition private property for community use should try putting up candidates for the local elections.
Meanwhile, the question remains why Ocset people should assume there might be priority over normal procedures for their own ideas.
Sadie
proper procedures
23.09.2004 15:34
bettysnake
e-mail: bettysnake@hotmail.com