Nottinghamshire Indymedia

Events

Startpage

> UK Indymedia
> Global Indymedia

> Guidelines
> Chatroom
> About Us
> Security

> Projects
> On Ya Mobile
> Local Weather

Support Us

We are an all volunteer collective and receive no regular funding. Please consider donating.


Local Events

This events wire is no longer being updated. Please use the new site to publicise events.

More local events on Veggies/Sumac Diary


Freedom of Information

Search archives

Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech

Iris scans for mental health service users

Peter | 12.03.2008 16:28 | Health | Technology

The Wells Road Centre, used by mental health service users, introduced iris scanning to control access to the building in January this year. This was, ostensibly, to keep users of the building safe. The scheme has already been discontinued because it was found to be a waste of money.

Imagine my surprise when speaking to a friend of mine, who is a mental health service user at the Wells Road Centre in Mapperley, Nottingham, that the Centre had introduced iris scans for anyone entering the building. My first thought was "you must be joking!" The idea of iris scan access seems orwellian and sinister in any application, but using it in an environment where paranoia is commonplace seemed like madness! I wanted to find out what was going on.

I contacted a manager at the centre expressing my concern. She informed me that the system had been introduced as a way to stop drug dealers and ex-service users entering the building. Apparently, after "exhaustive consultation" with service user groups, iris scanning was decided on as the best way to manage this.

This struck me as bizarre due to the cost of this technology, and the likely effect on some service users who might be expected to fear and distrust the technology. For example, schizophrenics can experience delusions of control, e.g. that external agencies are inserting thoughts in their head, and this kind of technology could easily trigger such delusions. This should be obvious to staff working in mental health. A similar point was raised during evidence given by a House of Commons Select Committee on the government's ID cards scheme by Dr Edgar Whitley (London School of Economics' Information Systems Group):

"At the Westminster e-Forum meeting on 14 February there was a speaker from a mental health charity* pointing out that if you have mental health problems and schizophrenia and are concerned about government, being forced to enrol in a government-controlled database is clearly not going to be very beneficial for you."
 http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmselect/cmsctech/1032/6050307.htm

As the arm of the state most prominent in service users lives, the same could be said about a health service controlled dataabse. It seems that information systems researchers are aware of the issues, but those running mental health services are slower on the uptake!

There are other fears that service users and staff might have about the technology. It is deeply invasive to people's privacy, requiring a person's biometric information be stored. Whilst the Wells Road Centre scheme was full of reassurances about compliance with the Trust's Data Protection Policy, there was no guarantee that the data couldn't be used to track the coming and going of people using the building in the future.

Apparently provision was made for service users who did have problems with the scheme. They could alert staff to their presence and be let in a different door. How this option was made available to service users is not clear. Were service users informed that the scheme was voluntary, or were they just told "This is happening"? That would hardly be informed consent.

These tactics are similar to those that are being employed by the government in bringing in the national ID register. At first sight the scheme appears to be voluntary - until you realise that there are strings attached to non-cooperation, and that there might very well be a change in the rules at some later date making inclusion on the database compulsory. Given the vulnerability of some mental health service users to authority figures, and their dependence on the services provided, I imagine informed consent to the scheme would be difficult to determine.

Fortunately the pilot iris scanning was terminated during February, because "it did not achieve the original brief, and was not considered to be adding benefit in terms of staff, patient and visitor safety." Sadly it wasn't ditched because of the civil liberties implications, but good that it came to an end. I have no problem with the Centre wanting to protect staff and service users from abuse, but surely there are better ways to do it than this.


*Jane Harris, Senior Campaign Officer, Rethink. Presentation in Westminster eForum "Implementing ID Cards"

Peter
- e-mail: kropotkin1842@yahoo.com

Download this article in pdf format >>
Email this article to someone >>
Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

What??????

13.03.2008 20:34

What were they thinking? As if you need this kind of technology to look after vulnerable people. Isn't that supposed to be their jobs? Don't we give them (or at least some of them) rather large salaries to be expert in looking after these people? A nice human being at a front desk could do far better than any machine, with loads of other plusses too.

Incredulous


An oppressive feeling place

13.03.2008 21:05

I visit the Wells Road Centre sometimes, and know someone who is a patient there. It always seems like a very oppressive place. A human being to say hello at a front desk would be very nice – there already is an office with a reception window onto the entrance area, but you have to attract their attention and wait a while feeling awkward. I saw the Trust's announcement about the Iris scanner and it wasn't very clear that it was voluntary. If I remember correctly it made it sound like it was only 'special cases' where there would be exemptions. Many people at Wells Road are on sections (they are 'detained' there) and probably don't feel they have much choice over things like that. Even without meaning to, a powerful institution can gently bully people into submission. And as 'Incredulous' says, the people running Wells Rd should be experts in this field, they should know about institutional power vs empowerment of people. But alas I don't think they are very worried about that. I heard that patients were banned from the canteen recently!

Steve


wells rd notorious, social services seem in disarray&in need of cooperative work

14.03.2008 13:11

if your a social services worker join IWW, we have a health worker division, even if not a active member your membership & tithe will help the volunteers,
Check our constitution, we are growing & only radical union on every level in the uk.
you can rely on support if in crisis at workplace beyond normal union level
www.iww.org.uk

green syndicalist


Submission

24.08.2008 06:26

Front desk should be polite and friendly.Bullying to submission ah what to say about that.
_____________
partul
Oklahoma Drug Treatment

Shrestha12
mail e-mail: shrestha.pratul@gmail.com