GUINEA PIG FARM TO CLOSE AFTER HATE CAMPAIGN
By Alex Thompson, PA
A farm is to cease breeding guinea pigs for medical research following a long-running campaign of intimidation by animal rights activists, a spokeswoman for the family-run business said today.
David Hall and Partners said it would shut down its guinea pig breeding operations at Darley Oaks Farm in Newchurch, Staffordshire, at the end of the year.
The Hall family, which has been subjected to a six-year hate campaign by animal rights extremists, said they hoped the decision would prompt grave robbers to return the body of 82-year-old Gladys Hammond, whose remains were stolen from a churchyard in nearby Yoxall.
In a statement released through a spokeswoman, who declined to be named, the Hall family said: "David Hall and Partners' involvement in breeding guinea pigs for biomedical research will cease at the end of 2005.
"The business, which has operated for over three decades, will undergo a phased closure until then to ensure the welfare of animals involved.
"The business has continued during a sustained protest from animal rights extremists for six years, which included the desecration of the grave of Gladys Hammond last October.
"We now hope that, as a result of this announcement, those responsible for removing Gladys' body will return her so she can lie once again in her rightful resting place.
"David Hall and Partners are planning a return to traditional farming. They have no plans to be involved in any way in the breeding of animals for medical or scientific research.
"No further comment will be made on the closure of the guinea pig breeding business until it has been finalised at the end of the year."
The body of Gladys Hammond, the mother-in-law of Christopher Hall, who co-owns Darley Oaks Farm with his brother John, was stolen from a grave at St Peter's church last October.
It followed a sustained campaign of intimidation which included regular protests at the gates, firebomb attacks, a paedophile smear campaign and the cutting of electricity and phone lines.
ends
Watch the bones re-appear and wonder who gets the blame...
Comments
Hide the following 16 comments
Taken long but in the end the strongest always win
23.08.2005 12:19
Julie
nice one
23.08.2005 15:26
well done to all those involved.
Kidda
Inspiration!
23.08.2005 16:44
The Animal Rights movement are truely dedicated people and this is reflected in their approach.
Other campaigns should take a leaf out of their book and demolish corporations from the bottom upwards - find their weakest spots and strike!
They get results and that's what counts here.
That's a lot more than a lot of people can say in other comparable campaigns and movements.
We are now a day nearer to seeing an end to the corporate vivisection industry!
we are everywhere motherfuckers!
e-mail: by_whatever_means_necessary!
Nice one
23.08.2005 19:06
guinea pig
Well-titled
23.08.2005 19:09
Mark
Own goal
23.08.2005 21:29
That said, I think a lot of you are overestimating the resilience of the animal rights campaigners. The only reason they've succeeded to the extent that they have now is because the police are powerless to deal with them. If the government grew a spine then they could deal with it using things like counter-terrorism legislation, double-figure prison sentences, blackmailing people into becoming informants, planting evidence, ect. After all, it worked in America under J. Edgar Hoover with the country's assortment of communist scum, so I see no reason why it shouldn't work here against our own sick deviants.
Humpty Dumpty
The Hell-Hole finally closes!
24.08.2005 07:49
Other campaigns should note this effectiveness and USE IT. Hanging banners isn't going anywhere. Why aren't GAP windows getting smashed? Nestle offices? There are people being tortured and killed because of these corporations, so does a pane of glass really matter more? What if you met these people? "Sorry I never really bothered to save your life, I didn't want to smash a window...".
As for breeding the guinea pigs aborad - this may well happen - but who will import them? Several major airlines have agreed not to import laboratory animals thanks to the Gateway to Hell campaign. If anyone takes up the offer, they will be target until they drop out. Simple as that.
Random
Food for thought
24.08.2005 09:23
And you can be sure if they use laws on animal rights, they'll use them on other people - Harassment laws were first used on animal rights, then anti-GM, then anti-Arms Trade and now on striking Gate Gourmet workers, who next?
As for Humpty Dumpty's comments - well for a start they haven't actually caught many people doing the "serious" acts of criminal damage - your suggestion is to plant evidence! What are you ex-Stasi? Have you served with the fascist Caribineri in Italy? And they already give ridiculously long jail sentances - for example Sarah Gisborne got six and half years for damaging some cars! Imagine if you'd done that pissed on a Saturday night after pubs closed - you'd get a fine or community service. The police already have a whole host of laws - they just ain't catching anybody.
Edith
Pyrrhic victory
24.08.2005 14:23
Digging up corpses, threatening to bomb people with vaugue links to the farm, attacking homes with small children inside — this is no way to get what you want in the 21st century, and will lose the movement a huge amount of support.
There are millions of people who would happily join in a protest against such farms, but will not do so because they don't want to be tarred with the same brush as the extremists who have been attacking the farm for the past decade. If you said "animal rights campaigner" to someone 20 years ago they'd have pictured a little old lady who took in thousands of stray cats, and they would have supported them. Say it today, and they think of a thug in a balaclava threatening that same little old lady because her grandson cleans the toilets at a chicken factory, and they want to lock them up and throw away the key.
You can trot out the same old line about this being the fault of the evil capitalist mainstream media if you like, but it doesn't change the reality in which we now live.
In addition, and as has already been stated above, the government has used the crimes of the few to clamp down on the many, making campaigning against such businesses much harder for everyone else.
As for "learning from these tactics for other fights", what are you going to do? Dig up Tony Blair's granny and dump her in the river?
Most depressing is the claim that "the strongest always win in the end". This is exactly the kind of world supposedly left-wing people should be fighting against. I want a world where human decency and co-operation come out on top, not one where people get what they want through violence, with no regard for what anyone who disagrees might think. That way lies the politics of Hitler.
FT
Fuckwit, Troll or Fuckwit Troll?
24.08.2005 16:25
"I'm glad to see that the farm in question is closing, but while animal rights activists may have won the battle, there is no way they are going to win the war. Listen to the radio phone-ins, read the postings on websites, even just raise the subject down the local, and you'll see that the majority of people in this country, while wanting to see an end to vivisection in the long-term, are absolutely horrified by the tactics the campaigners have used."
Yup - I find that the majority of the population call radio phone-ins, post on websites and visit your local.Without a doubt, these are key indicators of the thoughts of 60 million people - so I guess thats MORI out of business then.
FT wrote:
"Digging up corpses, threatening to bomb people with vaugue links to the farm, attacking homes with small children inside — this is no way to get what you want in the 21st century, and will lose the movement a huge amount of support."
What "movement" would that be then? And, not wishing to piss on your picnic or anything, but I think you'll find that those who committed the grave robbing, house 'attacks' and bomb threats wanted the farm to close, and as if by magic (and according to the farm owner because of the acts of which you complain), IT IS CLOSING and, all in the 21st century.
FT wrote:
"There are millions of people who would happily join in a protest against such farms, but will not do so because they don't want to be tarred with the same brush as the extremists who have been attacking the farm for the past decade. If you said "animal rights campaigner" to someone 20 years ago they'd have pictured a little old lady who took in thousands of stray cats, and they would have supported them. Say it today, and they think of a thug in a balaclava threatening that same little old lady because her grandson cleans the toilets at a chicken factory, and they want to lock them up and throw away the key."
Just out of interest, did the tactics of 20 years ago stop vivisection, or not? Oh, btw, that was a rhetorical question - I'd encourage you not to answer it. We already have cleverer trolls than you flooding the site as it is.
FT wrote:
"In addition, and as has already been stated above, the government has used the crimes of the few to clamp down on the many, making campaigning against such businesses much harder for everyone else."
Did it escape your attention that poeople are being arrested for holding banners in Parliament Square? Did you miss the fact that people are likely to be deported for 'justifying terrorism'. Did you miss the fact that they tried to pass legislation to stop Brian Haw sitting outside the "shite of democracy" (oops seat) with a megaphone? It's almost as if the government will do anything to stop any dissent. Any effective campaign is going to be legislated against. Almost as if the state wants to protect the status quo and maintain the monopoly on violence and the use of illegal force.
FT wrote:
"Most depressing is the claim that "the strongest always win in the end". This is exactly the kind of world supposedly left-wing people should be fighting against. I want a world where human decency and co-operation come out on top, not one where people get what they want through violence, with no regard for what anyone who disagrees might think. That way lies the politics of Hitler"
The state is far closer to the politics of Hitler than the animal rights activists can ever hope to be. With a 'defence' budget of £33Bn - its clearly the strongest as well - especially with unthinking trolls like you swearing blind obedience to it as it inflicts its violence and misery on millions on a daily basis.
Trollfinder General
I give up
24.08.2005 16:53
I'll leave you to rip shreds of each other while nobody listens. I hope you enjoy each other's company.
FT
FT
24.08.2005 18:04
Of course, it won't happen because we have one of the most pathetic, gutless governments in the world, run by people unwilling and unable to deal with anything in a strong and direct manner.
Humpty Dumpty
Push off Humpty
24.08.2005 22:14
RogerRabbit
A note of caution, FT
25.08.2005 07:25
I work as a researcher for a prestigious morning national radio phone-in show. We had a ton of texts and calls from sympathisers to the animal cause. Hardly any were read out or asked to speak and those who were broadcast were picked out because they sounded like inarticulate nutcases rather than the many more lucid people who would have been better ambassadors to their cause. Of course, on the pro-vivisection side, the opposite was true.
So be a bit careful about who is creating and perpetuating stereotypes.
tom
This just shows brutality and violence always win
25.08.2005 13:42
Craig, Nottingham
Good riddance
30.08.2005 11:14
Shrek