HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Liverpool Indymedia

STOP FRAUD ON THE COURT IN THE UK

UK PEOPLE | 21.04.2016 14:35 | Repression | Liverpool | London

UK FAMILIES AND PEOPLE INITIATIVE: Ask the Secretary of State for Justice Rt Hon Michael Gove MP and Home Secretary Rt Hon Theresa May MP to investigate and put a stop to the serious organised crime of Fraud on the Court with a public scrutiny via a Public Inquiry.

The Public Enquiry is to establish people’s right according to the Protection from Eviction and Harassment Act 1977 and investigate fraud on the public purse and on the individual perpetrated against the Fraud Act 2006.

Fraud on the Court involves serious organised criminal activities such as:

1 – Court’s proceedings created without payment of the court’s fee to start fraudulent claims

2 – Production of fake warrants and bogus court’s orders obtained in full abuse of court’s process

3 – Unlawful evictions and dispossession of families’ homes and assets often conducted using violence by private debt collector companies against innocent victims

4 – Refusal and failure by the police to record and investigate crime reports claiming that theft is a ‘civil matter’. Hence, there is no investigation into the scam by police or independent bodies leading to a fundamental breach of Human Rights for the victims left deprived of homes with all personal belongings and assets. This happens without protection and with no redress in full violation of the Tort (and interference with Goods) Act 1977.

Why is this important?

FRAUD ON THE COURT IN BRIEF:

Those instigating Fraud on the Court do not pay the court’s fees to obtain fake warrants or court’s orders used to deprive law abiding citizens stealing properties, land, money and assets. Invalid court’s papers are then used to secure unlawful entry and adverse occupation of residential premises by means of violence combined with the creation of a sense of authenticity through the invention of false court’s documents which appear to be factual.

Fraud on the Court involves (with intent) a serious abuse of the court’s process and “contempt of court” (Common Law). The victims are routinely ignored by the already overstretched police and other law enforcement bodies who are unable to investigate thoroughly and independently.

No matter what undeniable evidence is provided, there is no redress for the victims who are told that this scam is ‘it’s a civil matter’. It is a matter of fact that when victims DO REPORT this crime NO ONE INVESTIGATES. The only option left is to go back in the hands of the same staff in courts who are perpetrating the scam.

FRAUD BY CONCEALMENT:

The victims are denied inspection and copies of data from the court’s file which remain concealed.

Victims are also crucially denied access to and release of the computerised court records where all the documents and interactions with the court of any party into the proceedings are recorded.

The nature, extent and sophistication of this fraud, is far beyond the comprehension and reach of the average litigant in person and law enforcement officers by the police force.

We are asking for the full support of: All Her Majesty the Queen’s servants who are designated to ensure a fair and just society against this serious organised crime. We are demanding urgently a Public Inquiry to investigate fully and independently the seriousness of the crimes involved by using Fraud on the Court.

The non-payment of the court’s fee is not only a major deception and fraud on the on the public purse but also on the individual. This theft on the public happens in a time when the UK court’s system is crying for more funds. The recent sharp increase in the court’s fees have already reduced considerably the access to justice for the most vulnerable that cannot afford to pay.

Fraud upon the court is devastating for the victims waiting and hoping to receive relief from the courts. The victims lose their homes, their assets, their jobs, their companies and ultimately their liberty and health in breach of their fundamental statutory rights.

This adds burden on the already struggling NHS and Social Security systems whilst the income from many tax payers is lost. This scam is often used by banks, legal professionals, private companies, and dishonest landlords and council officers aided by court’s officers. Meanwhile criminal convictions and assets stripping founded on complex illegalities and irregularities send every day honest hardworking families and people left penniless and homeless in the streets begging for help.

Innocent families and people are held hostage with children and frail old people ending up homeless and traumatised as victims of Fraud on the Court.

Those few victims of Fraud on the Court who persist in chasing justice are being passed between agencies without any result or redress. Stealing from people is a crime. Taking away their assets and homes making people homeless with Fraud on the Court is a very serious and sophisticated crime for which there is no defence for the victims. Fraud of any kind is a crime and Fraud on the Court is one of the worst. An unpunished crime encourages new ones. Those committing Fraud on the Court are still there and get away with impunity. It is only a matter of time before someone you know will become the next victim.

In the public interest, in order to strengthen the fairness, accountability and transparency and in name of justice and fairness join by signing this petition for a Public Inquiry and ask for the Parliament’s full support to investigate and stop the Fraud on the Court in the UK.

Any person who believes to be a victim of Fraud on the Court can send their opinions contacting UK PEOPLE at a new address to come as ODDLY our email address may have been hacked...the account disappeared from Google.....Strange he.... ?!?

Useful links:
The Fraud Act 2006 -
 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/contents

The Protection from Eviction and Harassment Act 1977 -
 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/43/contents

The Tort (and interference with Goods) Act 1977 -
 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/32/contents

Fraud on the Court - What is it? -
 http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/fraud-on-the-court.html

Fraud on the Court - Some stories of honest families plainly wronged - here:
The next phase of the Crawford Castle -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLtdNlwPckQ

UK PEOPLE
- e-mail: pinquiry2016@yahoo.com
- Homepage: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-fraud-on-the-court-in-the-uk

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

see this link first...

25.04.2016 01:02

juxtapositional information located here

losethename.com

Freeman
- Homepage: losethename.com


I know a Victim

03.05.2016 19:27

I know a victim of such a fraud and there is no response from the court over whether the claimant has paid the fees or on what basis the fees have been waived.
This has to be wrong.
There is another scam in so far as many Russians are leaving their rented accommodation and then claiming that goods of high value were sold by the landlord for profits. It is a classic Tort trap.
One could understand that the Law is there to protect reasonable people but these are a group of people who make it their career to abuse our legal system.
The government needs to do something about this, I think they would recover more than they invest in the cost of rooting out these people.

Bhayu
mail e-mail: bhayu18@gmail.com


Legal Aid Certificates procured through fraud and deception.

06.06.2016 21:01

In 1986 I was a small works builder seeking a debt from a client of £6,173.
At this time he was able to procure Legal Aid Certificates for himself and his wife which eventually amounted to £32,000 on a pack of lies and false claims, all of which were either rejected by, or conceded to, a court almost 5 years later which is the proof beyond any doubt at all that the Certificates were gained by fraud and deception and all of those who benefited were paid from public funds gained by fraud and deception.

Colin Peters
mail e-mail: colin-peters2@sky.com
- Homepage: http://colinpetersbd40jh.tripod.com/truth


Legal Aid Certificates procured through fraud and deception.

06.06.2016 21:01

In 1986 I was a small works builder seeking a debt from a client of £6,173.
At this time he was able to procure Legal Aid Certificates for himself and his wife which eventually amounted to £32,000 on a pack of lies and false claims, all of which were either rejected by, or conceded to, a court almost 5 years later which is the proof beyond any doubt at all that the Certificates were gained by fraud and deception and all of those who benefited were paid from public funds gained by fraud and deception.

Colin Peters
mail e-mail: colin-peters2@sky.com
- Homepage: http://colinpetersbd40jh.tripod.com/truth


Legal Aid Certificates procured through fraud and deception.

06.06.2016 21:02

In 1986 I was a small works builder seeking a debt from a client of £6,173.
At this time he was able to procure Legal Aid Certificates for himself and his wife which eventually amounted to £32,000 on a pack of lies and false claims, all of which were either rejected by, or conceded to, a court almost 5 years later which is the proof beyond any doubt at all that the Certificates were gained by fraud and deception and all of those who benefited were paid from public funds gained by fraud and deception.

Colin Peters
mail e-mail: colin-peters2@sky.com
- Homepage: http://colinpetersbd40jh.tripod.com/truth


All evictions are unlawful

07.06.2016 14:21

All evictions are unlawful. There is no basis for eviction, ever. It is an accounting exercise. Accounting requires proof of a debt, which fraudsters never have - rarely, if ever, is a debt 'proven' as legitimate.
One of the worst types of fraud upon the court is FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION - of so-called "court officers" peddling fake claims which they know (or ought to know) have no enforceable contract, nearly always use VOID DEEDS, and do not meet the burden of proof!
The Civil Courts, being courts of commercial contracts, require a compliant contract to enforce - so where is the valid contract?
Courts are not doing their compliance. Compliance is a pre-requisite part of a Court's service, but their employees are so badly trained that they constantly hide behind the fob off of saying "we're not legally trained" - which is not relevant to compliance issues!
They are shirking their obligations under the new Consumer Rights Act 2015 and have no excuse for non-compliance with due process of Law nor their own Civil Procedure Rules which they ignore and even abandon, with alacrity!

Liz Watson
mail e-mail: discoveries@btinternet.com
- Homepage: www.one-voice-action-group.com


Due process is prevented by Non-disclosure!

07.06.2016 14:41

Another major fraud upon the Court being used is FRAUD BY NON-DISCLOSURE.
Dishonest solicitors and "court officers" of various types all know that it is impossible to defend a claim which is:

1. Undefined
2. Has no enforceable contract
3. Has no provable debt
4. Has used a void deed or falsified / forged paperwork
5. Has preliminary issues which have not been addressed nor dealt with, maybe have not even been identified!
6. Has had no disclosure under Part 31 of the CPR rules (requiring both favourable and adverse disclosure)

This is the old trick they play to stymie their opponent: no disclosure of a definable claim (what are they claiming, and why? where is the proof they even have a RIGHT of claim? insist on establishing these preliminary issues and having these issues met)
AND
No valid or enforceable contract (insist on seeing a compliance bi-lateral contract with T&C's contained within it)
AND
No provable debt (insist on seeing audited proof of the loan moneys being actually delivered / transferred - without this, there is no basis for the claim and it becomes fraudulent misrepresentation)
AND
No compliant deed (insist on seeing the original deed, duly signed by both parties and MUST have been executed in front of you! With at least TWO independent witness stignatures on the original - without this the deed is incurably VOID).
AND
All of the above are examples of preliminary issues. If these are not met, nothing can proceed. Banks are robbing people not only of their money, in collusion with HMCTS sloppy standards, but they are also robbing people of their right to a FAIR HEARING - let's face it, no fair hearing is even possible if there is no disclosure of vital evidence of all of the above!
AND
The new rules require that full disclosure under Part 31 is provided - without which, you can not be expected to defend something. So you have the lawful right to insist on full Disclosure being provided of all the relevant contractual proofs - in accordance with CPR Rule Part 31. There is no obligation upon you to defend a thing without it.

In most cases, victims end up being deceived by court officers who withhold all of the above, expecting them to do the impossible, like working blind-folded with both hands tied behind their back and leaving them defenceless in effect: Without all of the above disclosures in place, there is no basis for a hearing to occur nor can a determination of merits be made nor can a Fact Find be conducted without Part 31 disclosure.
Every claim must be DEFINED - what is being claimed, and why, and for what?

Also be alert to being wrongly labelled! e.g. being called a "borrower" when no borrowing has been proven nor demonstrated by the 'claimant'. Don't swallow it hook, line and sinker - challenge every single word that is used against you to try to dispossess you of your assets / property / rights.

Frequently the 'claim' form has never even been issued by the Court (as with our case) - NO COURT SEAL
therefore no proceedings exist.

False instruments need to be identified at a very early stage and flagged as a PRELIMINARY ISSUE.

All Preliminary issues need to be addressed to your fullest satisfaction, without which no fair hearing is possible.

Without disclosure, none of the issues can be validly 'tried'. No fact find can occur without the facts! Yet this is what many cheating solicitors expect people not to even notice, and they bank on this being 'missed' by their victims, in the hope they will become flustered and not even notice any and all of the above.

All Court users need to be warned! CAVEAT EMPTOR: you are entering into an arena which relies upon fraud, sophistry, chicanery and skulduggery, so you fully need your wits about you, and check and read every detail on the "claim" itself. You are 99% likely to have full grounds to succeed with a STRIKE OUT application there and then.

Liz Watson
mail e-mail: discoveries@btinternet.com
- Homepage: www.one-voice-action-group.com


Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

[navigation.actions2016]

[navigation.actions2015]

[navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

Actions 2013

G8 2013

Actions 2012

Workfare

Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech

Publish Your News


Temporary Scroogle search

-->