Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

Fighting to save Cambridge Picturehouse.

Cameraboy | 15.10.2013 22:07 | Cambridge | London

Last Wednesday afternoon about a hundred people and fifty huddled onto the pavement in front of the Arts Picturehouse in Cambridge to fight for its survival.

Out in the rain, but nobody cared.
Out in the rain, but nobody cared.

SOS! #1
SOS! #1

SOS! #2
SOS! #2

What price culture?
What price culture?

Lobbying in the Lobby.
Lobbying in the Lobby.

Smile, you're on TV.
Smile, you're on TV.

Julian Huppert MP pledging his support.
Julian Huppert MP pledging his support.


Along with local media, local MP Julian Huppert put in an appearance and pledged to support the campaign to keep this cinema open, which has included a 15,000 strong online petition.

This situtation has arisen due to some rather odd meddling by beaurocrats unknown at the Competiton Commission whom have intervened due the Picturehouse chain being owned by another chain, Cineworld.

To cut a long (and convoluted) story very short, this could ultimately end up with the Cambridge Picturehouse being forcibly sold off. One minor hitch with this though, as at present there are no buyers, so unless somebody steps in this could mean the Arts Picturehouse may be forced to close.

The Picturehouse is a unique community resource in Cambridge, because unlike the other rather more corporate (and frankly boring) muliplexes in Cambridge, the Picturehouse has become a bastion of alternative, non-Hollywood cinema, not only showing so-called art house and foreign language movies, but it is also home to the Cambridge Film Festival, and on occasion has even hosted evenings where local independent film makers can get their own projects seen by the public.

The Multiplexes needless to say don't do this.

In short, if the Picturehouse closes the only cinematic offerings we will have under a permanent roof will be the usual Hollywood blockbusters that you can probably watch on TV in a year or so anyway (or download sooner if you're more impatient).

So yes, once again out of touch beaurocrats stick their oar in without considering the long term consequences of what their decisions will do to a community.

Cheers guys.


Other sources:

 http://www.cinemasitter.co.uk/2013/08/in-the-name-of-sanity-save-the-cambridge-arts-picturehouse/

 http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Cambridge/Film-fans-criticise-potential-sale-of-Cambridge-Arts-Picturehouse-after-Cineworld-ruling-20130821060035.htm

 https://movieevangelist.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/the-cineworld-picturehouse-competition-commision-decision-my-interim-findings/https://movieevangelist.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/the-cineworld-picturehouse-competition-commision-decision-my-interim-findings/


*P.S.
I apologise for not filing this report sooner, but this is what happens when you get sanctioned by the Joke Centre.

Cameraboy


Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Blame game.

21.10.2013 12:48


It may be more productive to stop blaming outside cirmcumstances for the 'late' posting of this article. Taking responsibility is key part of anarchism. Blaming other people is what got us all into this mess in the first place.
Or has no-one ever thought of that?

anon


Troll much..?

04.11.2013 18:54

PC Troll strikes again!
:-)

Divide And Rule, eh?

Some things don't change.

Cameraboy


Cameraboy

05.11.2013 14:30

Learn to tell the difference between constructive criticism and trolling. One is meant to be helpful. Or do you want people to worship evrything you do without question?

Anon


Links