The company running the trials "understand some people have concerns about the technology" but they are "appalled they should resort to trespass and criminal damage to prevent legitimate scientific research"!
ho hum :-)
poon | 09.07.2007 18:05 | Bio-technology | Ecology | Cambridge
poon
Indymedia
Publish your news
Radio
FAQs
View all posts
Resources
Workspace
General Activism
Cambridge Action Network
People and Planet
East Anglia Social Forum
Local Community
Just Living (ethical guide)
Mill Road Social Centre
Keep Tesco Off Mill Road
We're All Neighbours
209 Radio
Green
Cycling Campaign
Critical Mass
CUECS
Transport 2000
Stop Stansted Expansion
Anti-war
Cambridge Campaign Against the Arms Trade
CamPeace
Students Against the War
Women in Black
Cambridge Amnesty
Animal Rights
Animal Rights Cambridge
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
Trade Justice
Baby Milk Action
World Development Movement
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
Stupid, stupid, stupid protesters
10.07.2007 18:13
Because it's GM ? Give me a break - if it means 10 less sprayings with chemicals ( and you can't grow spuds here without spraying for blight ) I'll take one millionth of an ounce of gene-added non-spud as compared to an ounce of blight spray residue.
It's about time GM activists got educated - who among those who wrecked the spuds even knows what exactly they were wrecking ? Not a damn one of you ! Yet in a bad wet year like this, where blight wrecks loads of spuds, you condemn me to pay twice as much as normal in order to get spuds to feed my family, and force me to eat chemicals.
Brenda Nobbs
who forced you to eat chemicals
10.07.2007 18:52
you may be poor but your not dumb.
none
on the contrary
11.07.2007 08:31
you've either swallowed the GM industry hype whole, or you are one of their PR types paid to write that kind of stuff in places like this.
>Trashing GM crops won't cure or stop anything.
It will stop the spread of GM pollen, and the cross-fertilisation of surrounding crops.
It's cured Britain of the GM blight that was spread across our island, endangering the future of your children's safe food supply, and meaning that you have no choice over what you eat. There were fields full of GM crops. Most were decontaminated, like this one. The GM companies fled the country with their tail between their legs.
> If they can produce a spud that doesn't rot and spoil a whole bag-full why not let them ?
Blight affects the potaotoes in the ground. They already produce non-GM blight-resistant ones: see the pictures/details at https://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/07/374920.html
> if it means 10 less sprayings with chemicals
Research into amounts of chemicals used by farmers on GM & non-GM has not shown the difference that the GM companies trumpeted. It just locks the farmers into buying the GM company's own chemicals.
> ( and you can't grow spuds here without spraying for blight
Try eating an organic blight-free potato grown in this country then!
>It's about time GM activists got educated - who among those who wrecked the spuds even knows what
> exactly they were wrecking ?
Probably every single one of them has researched the topic. And in any case, would you discriminate against people who are intelligent and passionate but might not have a university degree, oh struggling single mother of two?
> you condemn me to pay twice as much as normal in order to get spuds to feed my family, and force me to eat chemicals.
Oh yes, that'll be me forcing you then!! Now you're just having a laugh! Try feeding your kids organic (yes you can buy it cheaper in cheap supermarkets or some single mothers I know grow their own) if you're really worried about chemicals.
protestor