Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

CCTV 'no answer to street fights'

BBC repost | 22.12.2003 09:50 | Technology | Cambridge

The study was the first to compare police and hospital data
CCTV schemes in town centres do not stop drunken street violence breaking out, according to new research.

But cameras do alert police to assaults and reduce the number of people treated at casualty departments.

Scientists also say CCTV has reduced the severity of injuries suffered in street brawls.

But the study, published in the Injury Prevention journal, concludes there is no evidence of the surveillance systems having a deterrent effect.

It says: "The benefit of CCTV might lie less in preventing such offences... but more in facilitating a faster police response to arguments or assaults in public spaces, which limits their duration and therefore reduces the incidence and seriousness of injury."

Data comparisons

Experts from the University Hospital of Cardiff, who carried out the research, also concluded official police statistics on violent crime were inadequate and "inappropriate".

They found police statistics recorded only a quarter of assaults leading to treatment in casualty departments.


The evidence shows you can't rely on police violence statistics as an accurate measure of violence in the community
Co-author Jonathan Shepherd

The authors of the study say it was the first to compare police and hospital data and that its four year time span was longer than other CCTV evaluations.

They studied police reports of street violence from 1995 to 1999 in five randomly chosen towns where CCTV was installed in 1997 - Ashford, Eastbourne, Lincoln, Newport in the Isle of Wight and Peterborough.

The data was compared with towns that had no surveillance cameras at the time - Chelmsford, Poole, Derby, Scarborough and Huntingdon.

They then checked casualty department records for the treatments of assaults over the same period.

In the areas with CCTV the number of people treated for injuries after assaults fell by 3%, while the number of violent offences detected by police rose by 11%.

In the towns not covered by CCTV the numbers needing treatment rose 11%, but violent offences detected by police remained the same.

The research paper concluded that, if CCTV surveillance did act as a deterrent, police detection rates would have fallen.

Research echo

Co-author Jonathan Shepherd, a professor of oral and maxillofacial surgery, said: "The evidence shows you can't rely on police violence statistics as an accurate measure of violence in the community.

"True measures have got to take into account injury data from local hospitals as well as police information."

The findings echo government research published last year that concluded CCTV was not as useful in the fight against crime as was previously thought.

That research also concluded that better illumination could be a cheap way of cutting illegal activity, especially in crime hotspots.

BBC repost
- Homepage: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3339133.stm


Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

3 fucking percent!

22.12.2003 21:13

millions of pounds and less civil liberties for a 3% improvement not worth it in my opinion. It also proves that police have very little to do with crime rates an 11% increase in detection and only a 3% decrease in injuries.

translator


The definition of "Faggot"

22.12.2003 22:07

It's a lovely pork meatball in gravy. Mmmm-mm. Enough to make you swear off veganism for life, or for one night anyway. Today Mr Brain’s Faggots are still a firm family favourite, and a traditional part of the British way of eating.

 http://www.mrbrainsfaggots.com/

So there's your answer.

Not sure what our fake copper friend was on about though. There's nothing commie about a faggot.

Mr. Brain


THERE IS ALSO THE LITTLE MATTER OF

23.12.2003 00:17

the little matter of misuse of the images by the authorities, they use our money, we being the public, to spy on us law abiding citizens ..

himself


CCTV

23.12.2003 01:05

Thanks for the fascist interlude, Enforcer
A number of your comrades don't feel the same way
After all, some genuine off-the-wall fascists are equally threatened by the Big Brother fascist surveillence and control society that is now being instituted with extreme rapidity
Still, I suppose that at the top of your organisations you are being controlled by MI6 operators so all is fine and dandy
I feel a certain sympathy for the people taking potshots at the speed cameras
I note that, with the electronic key system in cars now, the police are demanding the wherewithall to stop cars in their tracks and no doubt otherwise control them
Shades of Diana

dh


Forget potshots. Use an angle grinder.

23.12.2003 07:56

 http://www.anglegrinderman.co.uk/
 http://www.anglegrinderman.co.uk/premise.htm

Govt projects like CCTV can only succeed if we let them. Make them too expensive, and they will fail. No technology is immune to this: we will always outnumber the men behind the cameras.

action boy


Links