Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

Democratise the ESF 2004

Hu | 02.12.2003 09:41 | European Social Forum | Free Spaces | Globalisation | Social Struggles | Cambridge

The next European Social Forum (ESF) is going to be held in the UK in late 2004. Serious issues have been raised about the process by which this decision was taken, and by which it is going forward. This article gives an account of what's happening, dates for two important meetings, and a Proposal for the Preparatory Process calling for an open and democratic ESF, for people to put their names to.

The next European Social Forum (ESF) is going to be held in the UK in late 2004. Despite opposition from many groups wanting a debate about the venue, it will almost certainly be held in London. So far the process to bring the ESF to the UK has been highly undemocratic and closed to the vast majority of groups and activists in the UK. Only a very small number of groups were fully behind the UK bid - primarily the SWP(GR), CND, War on Want, Unison North-East and the Mayor of London - and many others were deliberately excluded even though they had been fully active in the ESF English mobilisation network and worked with these groups constructively throughout the last two years.

Our experience as grassroots activists of the ESF in Paris was that the domination of the organisation process by traditional left forces in France led to the marginalisation of debates around Islamaphobia, local social forums, alternative media like Indymedia and grassroots movements of women and immigrants. It also left a serious accessibility problem for working people because the Forum was during the working week and disabled participants who found the place hostile to their needs. We are convinced that for a politically relevant and accessible ESF to take place in the UK in 2004, the process behind its organisation must be democratic, open and transparent, and allow the full participation of our diverse movement to shape it.

Two very important meetings

(1) 3 DECEMBER - ESF UK Process Launch Meeting, 4pm-6pm, Conference Room 5, City Hall, The Queens Walk, London SE1 2AA, nearest tube/station, London Bridge

All interested groups, activist networks, movements, NGOs, associations, community groups, social centres, trade unions, charities, and individuals are urged to attend to begin discussing the process of organising the ESF in London. The meetings' initiators are requesting that each group send no more than 2 delegates to ensure that no one group dominates the meeting, but that all can be represented. In France, 300+ groups signed the French Initiative for the ESF 2003 statement and were involved in the process. Only a handful have so far committed to the UK ESF.

2) 13 - 14 DECEMBER - ESF European Assembly Meeting, London
Time: Saturday, 9.30am to Sunday 1pm
Venue: City Hall, The Queens Walk, London SE1 2AA
Nature: The first meeting to discuss preparation for the ESF to be held in
England 2004 and an assessment of the Paris ESF 2003.

Representatives of the European social movements that were involved in organising the ESF in Florence and Paris will come to London to deliver their evaluation of the ESF in Paris and agree with the UK groups on a process acceptable to all for the ESF in the UK 2004. The European groups will not agree any process foisted on UK social movements - they want everyone to feel represented and involved in the process who wants to be. It is important again that as many groups, networks, organisations and so on as possible are represented at this meeting so as to lock into the organising process the diversity we need. We will send more information on this meeting asap.

On the eve of this European Assembly meeting, the 12 December, there will be a meeting at 8pm of the UK social forum network and all interested activists to exchange information and ideas about what they want for the ESF 2004 in the UK.

***************

Please circulate this statement below as widely as possible. It is important
that all interested groups and individuals across Britain will be enabled to
play an active role in the European Social Forum in 2004. The statement
limits itself to the organisational structures, because without democratic
structures in place, there is no mechanism that guarantees all voices to be
heard.

The statement will be put forward to the first open ESF meeting that takes
place on December 3 in London City Hall (conference room 5, 4pm) as well as
the the European assembly on December 13/14 that decides on how the ESF in
Britain in 2004 will be run. Therefore please sign up to this statement as
soon as possible - but by December 12, 6pm the latest -by sending an email
to  democratise_esf@yahoo.co.uk and indicate if you are signing up

a.. as an individual
b.. as an organisation
c.. in personal capacity as a member of an organisation


*** Proposal for the preparatory process of the ESF 2004 in Britain ***

We, the undersigned, intend to take an active part in preparing for the ESF
in Britain. In the spirit of the ESF being a process and space, not just an
event, we make the following suggestions on the organisation of the UK ESF
preparatory process.

A) Consultation Process
Many organisations and individuals in Britain still do not know that the ESF
2004 will take place here. Therefore, as a matter of some urgency, this
information must be disseminated as widely and as locally as possible. All
groups and campaigns should be actively encouraged to take a full part in
the preparatory process. The development of local social forums and ESF
caucus groups should be actively encouraged by all participants (for example
school students for the ESF/artists for the ESF/pensioners for the ESF etc).
No decision-making and organisational structures should be decided upon
prior to this consultation process.

B) Decision-making Process
As part of this consultation process, we propose the following:
* The ESF European Assembly (EA) should be the highest decision-making body
of the preparatory process, meeting every two months in accessible cities
across Europe, with particular efforts to reach out to the East.

* The decisions of the EA should be guided by a monthly UK Assembly (UKA),
beginning in January 2004 and meeting in different cities across the UK on a
weekend to ensure maximum participation.

* At the first UKA in January, decisions should be taken as to:

(1) the number and tasks of various working groups, eg: organisation,
finance, venues, transport, accommodation, outreach, programme, Assembly of
Social movements etc.
(2) setting up an organising group/network (OG) wholly accountable to the
UKA, whose sole task is to implement the political and organisational
decisions of the monthly assembly on a day-to-day basis. Participants in the
OG should openly declare their membership of any group, campaign or party.
With the increased involvement, the UKA can appoint additional members to
the OG. The UKA can also recall members of the OG.

* All of these structures - the EA, UKA and OG - must be open to all
interested actors of civil society - organisations and individuals - who
abide by the WSF Charter of Principles; they must operate by consensus
decision-making, meet in public, publish their agendas and discussion
documents in public well in advance of meetings and make available full
minutes as soon as possible afterwards.

(C) Organisation Process
To facilitate a democratic process, all meetings of the UKA and EA should be
organised by a special working group which works with the OG to:
* Prepare agendas
* Organise rotating chairs/facilitators
* Organise proper minute-taking
* Prepare the items to be discussed: photocopying documents and proposals,
organise their translation, organise the use of overhead projectors or
PowerPoint equipment to facilitate discussion, etc
* Publicise agendas, minutes and discussion items on various email lists and
the ESF UK website

Hu


Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

Read Animal Farm its about how revolutionary movements always fail

02.12.2003 10:42

You talk about democracy but you are the very enemies of democracy and freedom. If you lot had your way none of us would live in a Parliamentary democracy and none of us would have the right to do what we want. It would be the gulag for people who hunt foxes or eat meat, or anyone who disagrees with you. Read the book Animal Farm it shows how revolutionary movements always end in tyranny. You should also read "A peoples tradgedy - The Russian Revolution". An excellent book which exposes the horrors of the Russian revolution. Did you know that soon after that revolution that many people in Russia were reduced to cannabalism? Did you know that six million Russians starved to death after their revolution? Will it be any different with your revolution? And if so why, as every country which has overthrown capitalism has produced nothing but tyranny, starvation and poverty.

Man in the street


Animal Farm

02.12.2003 11:12

You should read a little more about who wrote Animal Farm:
 http://members.tripod.com/wintermute10/cbs-uk.htm

Real socialism is nothing to do with Stalinism and Gulags. And organising local democratic assemblies is not much to do with revolution either matey.

"If you lot had your way none of us would live in a Parliamentary democracy and none of us would have the right to do what we want."

If we lot had our way none of us would live in a Parliamentary democracy, that's for sure, we'd be in a real democracy, where we actually get the policies that we vote for. Look at how Parliament is stripping away your rights, one after the other: right to jury trial, right to move around without a bloody biometric ID card, right to peaceable assembly and protest, etc. Fuck all that for a start. Give me real democracy, and give it to me now.

joe


'consensus' or democracy?

02.12.2003 12:22

I understand the desire to have more groups + people active in the ESF bid process. But I remain concerned by this absolute commitment to 'consensus' decision-making.

My worry is this; say I was an MI5 type, what I'd do is form a made-up affinity group with a couple of fellow spooks, then turn up to every meeting and find some spurious (anti-hierarchical-sounding) reason to object to any proposal for action. Under 'consensus' rules, we could thereby veto any and all action and so paralyse the whole thing. Am I missing something?

kurious


Are you

02.12.2003 14:51

The same bunch who were wandering around paris going up to everyone British asking "are you in the SWP" nd when the answer was no bending their ears about how terrible and evil they were?

Very unsectarian?

Or perhaps you are the individual at the ESF in Florence who after showing up at the accomdation with no pass, id or knowing anyone proceded to abuse the Scottish people who were covering the door for being "SWP facists" before having to be led away?

I think we should be told.

Sonic


Three replies

02.12.2003 22:35

Thank you for the comments I'll reply in order:

to 'Man in the street'
Yes I have read Animal Farm, it's a great book isn't it? It warns us all of how blindly following self-serving political leaders leads to tyranny and suffering. It is clearly critical of the way the farm was before the animal uprising and the climax of the novel is the revelation that the state of affairs has reverted to one comparable with how it was before. I would recommend you read two other excellent books by Orwell: Down and Out in Paris and London and Homage to Catalonia. The former examines poverty and is very critical of the brutality of capitalism and the ruling class, the latter tells of how Orwell was almost killed trying to fight for something better during the Spanish Civil War.

As for your other comments, you make a lot of very strange assumptions about mine and many other people's beliefs and motives.

to kurious
You make an excellent point, I think I agree. Maybe someone else can offer a better defense of 'consensus decision-making'. To me it can only be strictly observed by small groups of people who know each other well. In the context of the ESF, maybe consensus means genuinely involving all voices who want to be heard and putting the emphasis on trying to cooperate rather than compete with each other. Still, the thrust of the proposal is to make the forum open and democratic.

to Sonic
I am none of the people you refer to, they sound quite barmy. Why the hostility and aggressiveness? If you are a member of the SWP (Socialist Workers Party) maybe you could explain to us why the bid has been made in the way it has and what's going on? This is the point, social forums should be democratic, open to everyone and aiming to transcend the petty divisions that get between people trying to do something about the state the world's in.

As for who I am; I'm a concerned individual who only learnt the ESF will be in the UK a couple of weeks ago at the ESF in Paris. I attended a last-minute meeting to discuss the issue and got put on a mailing list which seems to comprise of a collection of campaigners and activists from a range of backgrounds. Most of the text of my original post are taken from this list. The names of everyone who signs the statement will be given in at the two meetings mentioned above.

cheers

Hu


Best way to dissent is to get organised early!

03.12.2003 00:23

I fully support the petition and I think this process of open democracy should be part of all democratic processes: representative parliamentary, nominated committees and councils as well as social forums. Going to the GLA I hope the GLA can start the process of opening up itself to social movement, and that they could sign up for the Porto Alegre charter of principles themselves after a proper assembly debate. My model of a social forum is from Porto Alegre 2002, where the mayor Olivio Dutra had set up a participatory budgeting plan, devolving a significant (17% at the time) of all city budgeting to local neighbourhood groups, moving between the representative and the participator in partnership. This political culture happened as a development agaist the military regime in Brazil led by alternative trade unions (CUT), landless rural workers (MST) the progressive side of the catholic church (liberation theology people) and hundreds of other movements often associated with the Worker's party (PT). Why I remind this, well because London doesn't have this history, therefore the ESF is a political alien here. There is will to have something else, NGOs, activist groups, some GLA people know this. The alternative presented so far, by the SWP affiliated groups, is one of mass mobilisations and cheerleaders in Hyde Park (not very participatory in my view), the other alternatives seem Green or left of Labour party politics, again nothing new.

We need to embrace the forum as the principles of it carry the message, the past successes and the European (and worldwide) participation can steer it to the right direction (the germans are very knowledgable of this at least). Creating new ways of working together is a longer process than one year building up to the ESF, but it will create a sense of urgency that should make the unusual happen.

Ways of making this happen:
1) GET ORGANISED NOW,
2) EXPOSE and LEAK INFORMATION ,
3) SPREAD the WORD, more participation is more inclusive,
4) WORK ON MEDIA LANGUAGE and COVERAGE, more articles out can bang on the autism of the British media to the most important political getherings of our time.

A diverse vocabulary that uses other words that anti-capitalist (SWP word) or anti-globalisation (invented by the economic press) need to be used and demanded to be used in articles (alternative globalisation, global justice etc. are some ideas, BE CREATIVE.)

subversive


Why hide behind anonymity?

03.12.2003 11:12

You say you want 'transparency and democracy' - in that case why don't you say who you are and what organisation you represent, if any? Why hide behind anonymity?

My worry is that all sorts of people will try and derail the ESF process - some people did not want the ESF in the UK in 2004 and came up with all sorts of spurious arguments about why it should be in Greece instead (even though the Greeks said they didn't want it in 2004 - they wanted it the following year!). Some on the right-wing of the movement wanted the ESF to be wound down so that it only met once every two years - but if anything in the current political climate we should increase the number of anti-war and anti-capitalist discussions, not have fewer of them! The London Social Forum also tried to derail the process, by putting their own 'bid' for the ESF, because some of them have a sectarian attitude to other groups who were trying to get the ESF to the UK.

I'm not saying you are one of these people, but perhaps you should tell us who you are if you want us to come along to your meetings and support your petition.

Stephanie Collins


More Words...

04.12.2003 17:13

More up to date on where the procsess is at:
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/12/282454.html

In reply to subversive
Exactly, this is what many people are trying to do. Check out  http://wiki.uniteddiversity.com/democratic_esf for a visionary proposal of how the ESF could really become a means of fostering horizontal, international exchanges to build an unstoppable social movement rather than being a sad platform for groups to self-promote.

Reply to Stephanie Collins
I represent no group and have only been a 'member' of unoffficial activist/ antiwar groups that have no official membership structure. I don't see that who I am apart from this is particularly important as I'm not attempting to represent anybody else, gain power to organise a big event etc, simply trying to help create an open process in which I shall participate. For reasons of personal privacy I'd rather leave it at that (given the nature of some of the previous posts I hope you are understanding).

The meetings I gave the details of, are those of the people who have made the bid and the 'official' organising group (part of the point is we don't really know who this is). As far as I know they were not planning on inviting the general public which is why myself and others are promoting them.

Who are these 'others'? I'm not too sure, they seem to be a range of people I only know through a discussion list, many involved with local Social Forums in the UK.

There is talk of setting up a website for making the discussion more open which I fully support, my inbox is getting flooded! It has only not happened yet I think 'cos no-one has had the time/ resources etc. Apparently the proposal was drafted after a London Social Forum meeting.

You say "London Social Forum also tried to derail the process, by putting their own 'bid' for the ESF" I thought they were against it happening here because they thought there wasn't a strong enough movement in the UK and it was too likely to be dominated by a small clique. As it is they seem to be the most active in trying to make it transparent.

The idea of any group trying to make a 'bid' for the forum, seems in itself an attempt to derail the process as the WSF charter of principle itself starts with "The World Social Forum is an open meeting place..." and goes on to say "No-one, therefore, will be authorized, on behalf of any of the editions of the Forum, to express positions claiming to be those of all its participants" source:
 http://www.londonsocialforum.org.uk/about-charter.htm

Hu


www.esf2004.net online

14.02.2004 13:22

There has been an Independent website online for about a month now all about the European Social Forum 2004. Check it out: www.esf2004.net

If you log in as a user then you can submit links and news articles. There is also a wiki for collabarative work on the ESF, a chatroom and a forum (which needs to be used more).

The articles give a good record of what has been going on at the various meetings and so on. In the links section there is a good page with various mailing lists discussing the ESF:  http://www.esf2004.net/component/option,com_weblinks/Itemid,4/catid,8/

If more people would like to get involved with this site, no great skills are required, then please get in touch. Translators are especially needed as the site has multilingual capabilities but currently everything is in English.

Hopefully an official website will be online soon but its not clear what's happening on this.

Cheers

Hugh
mail e-mail: web@esf2004.net
- Homepage: http://www.esf2004.net


Links