Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

latest on New Cambridge Animal laboratory

bbc | 24.05.2002 10:11 | Cambridge

.

Animal laboratory 'should go ahead'


Plans for a controversial new animal research laboratory in Cambridge have received support from the UK Government's chief scientist.
Planning permission for the laboratory at Girton College on the city outskirts was turned down in February.

Cambridgeshire police said the cost of policing animal rights protests would be too high.

But the government's chief scientist David King has stepped in, lending weight to Cambridge University's appeal against the decision.



A decision to refuse the application would have a deeply damaging effect


Cambridge University
Professor King said it would be unacceptable if Cambridge University was unable to build the new laboratory in the city, though not necessarily at Girton.

South Cambridgeshire District Council rejected the plans amid concerns that testing on animals would attract protests like those staged outside the Huntingdon Life Sciences.

A spokesman said it could not guarantee public safety or afford the cost of policing protests at the laboratory, which would use monkeys for testing.

Last year, Cambridgeshire police spent £2m policing animal rights demonstrations.

Professor King told the BBC that funding would be found for a new laboratory in Cambridge researching neural diseases.

Alzheimer's research

In a statement, the university said: "It's good to know that the government supports so strongly the work scientists are doing to ease human suffering.

"The university remains convinced that this project is vital, and the best site is Huntingdon road.

"A decision to refuse the application would have a deeply damaging effect on the ongoing search for alleviation of life-threatening diseases, and potentially on the pharmaceutical industry of this country."

In February the council's decision to block the plan was described by the university as "deeply damaging".

A spokeswoman said research into such conditions as Alzheimer's, autism and Parkinson's disease would be set back because of the authority's decision.

Professor David King was Master of Downing College, Cambridge, and head of the university's chemistry department when he was brought in by Tony Blair to advise the government on the big scientific issues of the day.

bbc
- Homepage: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/england/newsid_2004000/2004270.stm


Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

BBC

24.05.2002 11:04

Anyone see the crappy, biased coverage of this on the BBC? The only alternative point of view allowed was about 5 seconds of some mad old woman ranting on, while the token Alzheimer's suffer was wheeled out for the sympathy vote - interestingly, he claimed that without animal testing we risk having another Thalidomide - despite the fact that Thalidomide WAS extensively tested on animals (and as a result of these tests, deemed to be safe!). Duh.

johnny_boy


animal torture big buisness for pharmacutical

24.05.2002 12:56

more taxpayers money down the toilet, with the government helping fund private animal torturers, useless research which will after years and years of animal suffering be of no benefit watsoever to humans. Just another excuse to waste taxpayers money on more sadistic mad scientist/multinational pharmacutical company projects.

nwa


testing works

24.05.2002 17:35

sorry johnny boy, but your wrong. thalidamide(sp?) was tested on animals but NOT extensively. the reason it had such disasterous effects was that it wasn't ever tested on pregnant animals. a bit of a mistake for a drug design for pregnant mothers. animal tests conducted after its affects were revealed showed that if it had been tested on pregnant rats then the side effects would have been shown up. sorry to rain on your parade but if animals had been used it would have saved a lot of human suffering, physical and mental.
i have compassion for animals but i have a far greater degree of compassion for fellow human beings. animal activists often use the thalidimide case to show how ineffectual animal testing is, but the fact is that it works. its cheap, its easy, the high production cycle and the complexity of a real animal compared to a computer model shows that animal testing IS the most effective way of testing drugs, and researching genetic and behavioural disorders.
i personaaly hope this lab goes ahead. sorry if my opinion offends anyone but the fact is i love my fellow human beings and think there happiness is more important.

euan


prozac turned me into an axe murderer

24.05.2002 21:24

i care about and love fellow human beings too, but why should my taxes be wasted by the government forking out to police these rich private multinational pharmacutical companies. common sense is the solution to alzheimers/parkinsons, in the case of alzheimers, zinc has been found to reverse this condition, in the case of parkinsons, dont box or prevent brain injury, ectasy has been proven to be beneficial to parkinsons sufferers. Autism can be prevented by not allowing our children to have the MMR vaccine,by avoiding forceps delivery, and in some cases by paying attention to our children and communicating with them, instead of pushing them to the side and ignoring them. Animal torturing benefits noone except the rich pharmacutical companies whose only motivation is not to alleviate human suffering but to make more profits. Prozac was a drug that was extensively tested on animals, and given the all clear to be taken by humans. The side effects of Prozac such as impulsive violence, and extreme mania that you cannot control and which has resulted in individuals running amok with automatic weapons and myself and my fellow housewives up on ABH and assault charges, was not picked up when the drug was extensively tested on animals, proving that all drugs destined to be consumed by humans must inevitably be tested on humans only, to extract the most accurate results and ensure that all drugs are safe, also to monitor and accurately explore the side effects of such drugs which are ultimately destined for human consumption.

housewife liberation front


Links