IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All
postings to the open publishing
newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK.
Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the
newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the
contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or
services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an
endorsement nor a recommendation.
After the recent discussion about the house that SHAC bought with funds raised for animal welfare the publicity and questions have clearly got too much and its up for sale. Where [DETAILS REMOVED] will be living remains to be seen.
The two individuals that live there have rented out one of the rooms since the house was purchased. At first this was too like minded supporters but now its for anyone who wants to rent a room in a 100% Vegan house. I assume this is just the next stage.
That price isn't for the house it's for a two week timeshare. SHAC are presumably under some sort of money pressure right now so they need to raise funds.
Thanks for the clarification. I foolishly thought it was because you didn't want people to know that money raised to help the fight against HLS was used to buy a house.
The excuse long used for the justification in the purchase and having to prominent SHAC people living there is that one of them is 'writing a book about SHAC'
This so called book has been in production for nearly two years with no sign of any progress. Don't forget how much money was being generated by SHAC in the early days. A stall in a good sized town could generate 10,000 on a Saturday and a lot of people discovered they could become 'full time activists'. Sarah Whitehead for example lived with her partner for three years on SHAC money while having no other source of income. Neither Jason Mullan or Nicola Tapping worked after 2007 and lived on money coming from the bank account Greg established in Luxembourg.
Comments
Hide 0 hidden comments or hide all comments
Not for sale
29.05.2012 10:58
None of this matters because the SHAC supporting mods here always hide the details anyway.
Brother is an estate agent (and a tit)
Been rented for ages
29.05.2012 11:08
ex SHAC
how the hell
29.05.2012 11:18
looks like it should be a shit load
Timeshare
29.05.2012 12:04
Franke
Mods - please remove urgently
29.05.2012 12:15
This is very important
Thank you
SHAC
e-mail:
info@shac.net
Homepage:
www.shac.net
Why so important ?
29.05.2012 12:20
interested bystander
Why the posts should be hidden
29.05.2012 12:22
Articles and/or comments may be hidden for the following reasons:
On very rare occasions, some content may be fully deleted. Past instances have included pornography and personal details.
SHAC
OK - thanks
29.05.2012 12:45
interested bystander
shac sound like scam artists
29.05.2012 12:57
disgusted
Book being written
29.05.2012 13:18
This so called book has been in production for nearly two years with no sign of any progress. Don't forget how much money was being generated by SHAC in the early days. A stall in a good sized town could generate 10,000 on a Saturday and a lot of people discovered they could become 'full time activists'. Sarah Whitehead for example lived with her partner for three years on SHAC money while having no other source of income. Neither Jason Mullan or Nicola Tapping worked after 2007 and lived on money coming from the bank account Greg established in Luxembourg.
Agatha Christie
Hide 0 hidden comments or hide all comments